Associations of freestall design and cleanliness with cow lying behavior, hygiene, lameness, and risk of high somatic cell count.

The objective of this study was to investigate associations of freestall design and cleanliness with cow lying behavior, hygiene, lameness, and risk of new high somatic cell count (SCC). Cows from 18 commercial freestall dairy herds (22 ± 15 cows/farm; mean ± SD) in Ontario, Canada, were enrolled in a longitudinal study. Four hundred focal cows that were <120 d in milk, had no mastitis treatment in the last 3 mo, and had an SCC <100,000 cells/mL at their most recent milk test were selected for the study. Data on SCC were collected through Dairy Herd Improvement Association milk testing (at ~5-wk intervals). Each farm was visited 5 ± 3 d (mean ± SD) after each milk test until 3 tests were completed (~105 d), for a total of 3 observation periods per cow. Elevated SCC was used as an indicator of subclinical mastitis. An incident of new high SCC was defined as a cow having SCC >200,000 cells/mL at the end of an observation period, when SCC was <100,000 cells/mL at the beginning of that period. Lying behavior was recorded for 6 d after each milk sampling, using electronic data loggers. Cows were scored during each period for lameness (5-point scale, with scores ≥3 = lame), body condition score (BCS; 5-point scale; 1 = thin to 5 = fat), and hygiene (4-point scale). Stall cleanliness was assessed during each period with a 1.20 × 1.65-m metal grid, containing 88 squares. The grid was centered between stall partitions of every tenth stall on each farm, and the squares containing visible urine or fecal matter (or both) were counted. Cow lying time averaged 10.9 ± 1.9 h/d. On average, cows with low BCS (≤2.5) spent 37 ± 16.6 min/d less time lying down than high-BCS cows (≥4.0). On average, cows tended to spend 36 ± 18.3 min/d more time lying down in deep-bedded versus mattress-based stalls. Mean proportion of soiled squares per stall was 20.1 ± 0.50%. Across farms, cow lying time decreased as the proportion of soiled squares per stall increased. A difference in daily lying time of ~80 more min/d was modeled for cows housed in barns with the cleanest stalls compared with those with the dirtiest stalls. Higher neck rail height [for every 1 SD (10 cm) increase] increased the odds (odds ratio = 1.5) of cows having a dirty upper leg-flank and udder. The odds of a cow having a dirty upper leg-flank, udder, and lower legs were 1.5, 2.0, and 1.9 times greater, respectively, for cows housed with dirtier stalls. Also, cows housed on farms with dirtier stalls had 1.3 times greater odds of being lame at the time of observation. Over the study period, 50 new high-SCC cases were detected, resulting in an incidence rate of 0.45 cases of new high SCC per cow-year at risk. No measured factors were detected to be associated with risk of a new high SCC. Overall, our results confirm that cows lie down longer in cleaner and more comfortable environments. Further, these results highlight the need for improved stall cleanliness to optimize lying time and potentially reduce lameness.

[1]  M. Gauly,et al.  Effects of cubicle characteristics on animal welfare indicators in dairy cattle , 2020, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[2]  D. Kelton,et al.  Bacterial concentrations in bedding and their association with dairy cow hygiene and milk quality. , 2019, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[3]  C. Revie,et al.  Assessment of farmers' compliance in implementing recommended cow comfort changes and their effects on lying time, stall and cow cleanliness within smallholder dairy farms in Kenya. , 2019, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[4]  T. DeVries,et al.  Comparison of physical and behavioral traits between dairy cows with low and high somatic cell count. , 2019, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[5]  Effects of two neck rail positions on heifer behavior and stall cleanliness in free stall barn , 2017 .

[6]  N. Bell,et al.  A prospective cohort study of digital cushion and corium thickness. Part 2: Does thinning of the digital cushion and corium lead to lameness and claw horn disruption lesions? , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  E. Pajor,et al.  Cow-level associations of lameness, behavior, and milk yield of cows milked in automated systems. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  Jennifer M. Chen,et al.  Muddy conditions reduce hygiene and lying time in dairy cattle and increase time spent on concrete. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  J. Rushen,et al.  Associations between lying behavior and lameness in Canadian Holstein-Friesian cows housed in freestall barns. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  J. Rushen,et al.  Lying times of lactating cows on dairy farms with automatic milking systems and the relation to lameness, leg lesions, and body condition score. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  J. Rushen,et al.  Prevalence of lameness and associated risk factors in Canadian Holstein-Friesian cows housed in freestall barns. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  J. Kaler,et al.  Unravelling the temporal association between lameness and body condition score in dairy cattle using a multistate modelling approach. , 2015, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[13]  J. A. Fregonesi,et al.  Dairy cow preference and usage of an alternative freestall design. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  D. Weary,et al.  Associations between herd-level factors and lying behavior of freestall-housed dairy cows. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  J. Jaśkowski,et al.  Body condition related to lameness in dairy cows. , 2014 .

[16]  Laura E. Green,et al.  Temporal associations between low body condition, lameness and milk yield in a UK dairy herd. , 2014, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[17]  G. Oikonomou,et al.  Control and prevention of lameness associated with claw lesions in dairy cows , 2013 .

[18]  H. Barkema,et al.  Associations of herd- and cow-level factors, cow lying behavior, and risk of elevated somatic cell count in free-stall housed lactating dairy cows. , 2013, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[19]  D M Weary,et al.  Herd-level risk factors for lameness in freestall farms in the northeastern United States and California. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  D. Weary,et al.  Benchmarking cow comfort on North American freestall dairies: lameness, leg injuries, lying time, facility design, and management for high-producing Holstein dairy cows. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  H. Barkema,et al.  Associations of dairy cow behavior, barn hygiene, cow hygiene, and risk of elevated somatic cell count. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  J. Rodenburg,et al.  Association of standing and lying behavior patterns and incidence of intramammary infection in dairy cows milked with an automatic milking system. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  J. Sørensen,et al.  Identifying risk factors for poor hind limb cleanliness in Danish loose-housed dairy cows. , 2011, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[24]  K. Bøe,et al.  Free-stall cleanliness is affected by stall design , 2011 .

[25]  H. Barkema,et al.  Invited review: effect of udder health management practices on herd somatic cell count. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  N. Cook,et al.  Time budgets of lactating dairy cattle in commercial freestall herds. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[27]  C. Winckler,et al.  Evaluation of data loggers, sampling intervals, and editing techniques for measuring the lying behavior of dairy cattle. , 2010, Journal of Dairy Science.

[28]  D. Weary,et al.  Effects of sawdust bedding dry matter on lying behavior of dairy cows: a dose-dependent response. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[29]  Michael M Schutz,et al.  Influence of milk yield, stage of lactation, and body condition on dairy cattle lying behaviour measured using an automated activity monitoring sensor , 2009, Journal of Dairy Research.

[30]  D M Weary,et al.  Lying behavior: assessing within- and between-herd variation in free-stall-housed dairy cows. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[31]  M. Green,et al.  Quarter and cow risk factors associated with a somatic cell count greater than 199,000 cells per milliliter in United Kingdom dairy cows. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[32]  J. A. Fregonesi,et al.  The stall-design paradox: neck rails increase lameness but improve udder and stall hygiene. , 2009, Journal of Dairy Science.

[33]  J. A. Fregonesi,et al.  Neck-rail position in the free stall affects standing behavior and udder and stall cleanliness. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[34]  Nigel B Cook,et al.  The influence of the environment on dairy cow behavior, claw health and herd lameness dynamics. , 2009, Veterinary journal.

[35]  D. Weary,et al.  Brisket boards reduce freestall use. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[36]  D. Weary,et al.  Effect of hoof pathologies on subjective assessments of dairy cow gait. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[37]  N. Cook,et al.  A Tool Box for Assessing Cow , Udder and Teat Hygiene , 2006 .

[38]  D. Weary,et al.  Influence of neck-rail placement on free-stall preference, use, and cleanliness. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[39]  D. Weary,et al.  Bedding on geotextile mattresses: how much is needed to improve cow comfort? , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[40]  N. Cook,et al.  Effect of free stall surface on daily activity patterns in dairy cows with relevance to lameness prevalence. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[41]  J. Rushen,et al.  Claw hardness of dairy cows: relationship to water content and claw lesions. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[42]  D. Weary,et al.  Bacterial populations on teat ends of dairy cows housed in free stalls and bedded with either sand or sawdust. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[43]  David J. Wilson,et al.  Monitoring udder health and milk quality using somatic cell counts. , 2003, Veterinary research.

[44]  D. Weary,et al.  Effects of three types of free-stall surfaces on preferences and stall usage by dairy cows. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[45]  J. A. Fregonesi,et al.  Behaviour, performance and health indicators of welfare for dairy cows housed in strawyard or cubicle systems , 2001 .

[46]  C. Phillips,et al.  The locomotion of dairy cows on concrete floors that are dry, wet, or covered with a slurry of excreta. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[47]  L. Garber,et al.  Papillomatous digital dermatitis and associated risk factors in US dairy herds. , 1999, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[48]  T. Lam,et al.  Estimation of variance components for somatic cell counts to determine thresholds for uninfected quarters. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[49]  I. Dohoo,et al.  Evaluation of changes in somatic cell counts as indicators of new intramammary infections , 1991 .

[50]  H. Erb,et al.  Relationship of changes in condition score to cow health in Holsteins. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.

[51]  P. E. Wagner,et al.  A Dairy Cow Body Condition Scoring System and Its Relationship to Selected Production Characteristics , 1982 .