On Joint Frequency and Power Allocation in a Cross-Layer Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Networks

Path loss in an underwater acoustic channel depends not only on the transmission distance, but also on the signal frequency. As a result, the useful bandwidth decreases with distance, a feature not normally present in terrestrial radio networks. This fact motivates the use of multihop communications in an acoustic network, and strongly influences its design, since the same set of protocols will exhibit different performance when operating in a different frequency range. Multihop transmission is considered for large area coverage in acoustic networks, with an eye towards efficient power and bandwidth allocation. Power control is used as a practical means of optimizing the overall performance across the physical, medium access control (MAC) and routing layers. A geographic routing technique, called the focused beam routing (FBR), which requires each node to know only its own location and that of the final destination, is coupled with the distance aware collision avoidance protocol, which regulates the channel access. Results show that the average energy per bit consumption is reduced by adjusting the power, center frequency, and bandwidth in accordance with the network node density. Specifically, as the density increases, greater bandwidths offer per-hop energy reduction as well as a reduced packet collision rate.

[1]  B. B. Bauer,et al.  Fundamentals of acoustics , 1963 .

[2]  David A. Maltz,et al.  DSR: the dynamic source routing protocol for multihop wireless ad hoc networks , 2001 .

[3]  Jun-Hong Cui,et al.  Improving the Robustness of Location-Based Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2007, OCEANS 2007 - Europe.

[4]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[5]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Routing algorithms for delay-insensitive and delay-sensitive applications in underwater sensor networks , 2006, MobiCom '06.

[6]  M. Stojanovic Capacity of a Relay Acoustic Channel , 2007, OCEANS 2007.

[7]  Jun-Hong Cui,et al.  Energy efficient multi-path communication for time-critical applications in underwater sensor networks , 2008, MobiHoc '08.

[8]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Highly dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers , 1994, SIGCOMM.

[9]  Dario Pompili,et al.  A cross-layer communication solution for multimedia applications in underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems.

[10]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges , 2005, Ad Hoc Networks.

[11]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Integrated Cost-Based MAC and Routing Techniques for Hop Count Forwarding in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[12]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Distributed power control for underwater acoustic networks , 2008, OCEANS 2008.

[13]  Jiejun Kong,et al.  The challenges of building mobile underwater wireless networks for aquatic applications , 2006, IEEE Network.

[14]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Design and Capacity Analysis of Cellular-Type Underwater Acoustic Networks , 2008, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[15]  S. Singh,et al.  The WHOI micro-modem: an acoustic communications and navigation system for multiple platforms , 2005, Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE.

[16]  A. Laouiti,et al.  Optimized link state routing protocol for ad hoc networks , 2001, Proceedings. IEEE International Multi Topic Conference, 2001. IEEE INMIC 2001. Technology for the 21st Century..

[17]  Josep Miquel Jornet Montana AUVNetSim: a Simulator for Underwater Acoustics Networks , 2008 .

[18]  W. Kuperman,et al.  Fundamentals of Ocean Acoustics , 2011 .

[19]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Energy-Efficient Routing Schemes for Underwater Acoustic Networks , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[20]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[21]  John S. Heidemann,et al.  Low-power acoustic modem for dense underwater sensor networks , 2006, WUWNet '06.

[22]  Yuan Li,et al.  Research challenges and applications for underwater sensor networking , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. WCNC 2006..

[23]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Focused beam routing protocol for underwater acoustic networks , 2008, Underwater Networks.

[24]  Adam Wolisz,et al.  An energy-efficient power control approach for WLANs , 2000, Journal of Communications and Networks.

[25]  Andrew T. Campbell,et al.  Variable-Range Transmission Power Control in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[26]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Distance aware collision avoidance protocol for ad-hoc underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2007, IEEE Communications Letters.

[27]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Idle-time energy savings through wake-up modes in underwater acoustic networks , 2009, Ad Hoc Networks.

[28]  Ron Johnstone,et al.  Electromagnetic wave wireless communication in shallow water coastal environment: theoretical analysis and experimental results , 2009, WUWNet.

[29]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Overview of networking protocols for underwater wireless communications , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[30]  M.J. Ryan,et al.  On the Benefits of High Absorption in Practical Multi-hop Networks , 2007, OCEANS 2007 - Europe.

[31]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel , 2007, MOCO.

[32]  Jan M. Rabaey,et al.  Distributed algorithms for transmission power control in wireless sensor networks , 2003, 2003 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking, 2003. WCNC 2003..

[33]  Urbashi Mitra,et al.  Analysis of a simple multihop underwater acoustic network , 2008, Underwater Networks.