Knowledge Spillovers from Renewable energy Technologies, Lessons from patent citations

This paper studies the knowledge spillovers generated by renewable energy technologies, unraveling the technological fields that benefit from knowledge developed in storage, solar, wind, marine, hydropower, geothermal, waste and biomass energy technologies. Using citation data of patents in renewable technologies at 17 European countries over the 1978-2006 period, the analysis examines the relative importance of knowledge flows within the same specific technological field (intra-technology spillovers), to other technologies in the field of power-generation (inter-technology spillovers), and to technologies unrelated to power-generation (external-technology spillovers). The results show significant differences across various renewable technologies. While wind technologies mainly find applications within their own technological field, a large share of innovations in solar energy and storage technologies find applications outside the field of power generation, suggesting that solar technologies are more general and, therefore, may have a higher value for society. Finally, the knowledge from waste and biomass technologies is mainly exploited by fossil-fuel power-generating technologies. The paper discusses the implications of these results for the design of R&D policies for renewable energy innovation.

[1]  J. Sweeney,et al.  BARRIERS TO IMPLEMENTING LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES , 2012 .

[2]  Asami Miketa,et al.  The impact of R&D on innovation for wind energy in Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom , 2005 .

[3]  G. Duysters,et al.  The technological origins of radical inventions , 2010 .

[4]  Richard G. Newell,et al.  Where does energy R&D come from? Examining crowding out from energy R&D , 2012 .

[5]  J. Bergh.  Optimal Diversity: Increasing Returns versus Recombinant Innovation , 2008 .

[6]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[7]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 2004 .

[8]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  THE NBER/SLOAN PROJECT ON INDUSTRIAL TECHAIOLOGY AND PRODUCTIVITY: INCORPORATING LEARNING FROM PLANT VISITS AND INTERVIEWS INTO ECONOMIC RESEARCHt Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Evidence from a Survey of Inventors , 2000 .

[9]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[10]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[11]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[12]  Frauke G. Braun,et al.  Innovative Activity in Wind and Solar Technology: Empirical Evidence on Knowledge Spillovers Using Patent Data , 2010 .

[13]  David Popp,et al.  THEY DON'T INVENT THEM LIKE THEY USED TO: AN EXAMINATION OF ENERGY PATENT CITATIONS OVER TIME , 2005 .

[14]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[15]  F. Malerba,et al.  Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification , 2003 .

[16]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[18]  Gregory C. Unruh.  Escaping carbon lock-in , 2002 .

[19]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[20]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[21]  David Popp,et al.  Induced Innovation and Energy Prices , 2001 .

[22]  Gregory F. Nemet,et al.  Inter-technology knowledge spillovers for energy technologies , 2012 .

[23]  Joëlle Noailly,et al.  Directing technical change from fossil-fuel to renewable energy innovation: An application using firm-level patent data , 2015 .

[24]  V. Shestalova,et al.  Innovation policy for directing technical change in the power sector , 2013 .

[25]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[26]  Antoine Dechezleprêtre,et al.  Knowledge spillovers from clean and dirty technologies : A patent citation analysis ⇤ , 2013 .

[27]  Gregory F. Nemet,et al.  Do Important Inventions Benefit from Knowledge Originating in Other Technological Domains? , 2011 .

[28]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History , 1994 .

[29]  P. Aghion,et al.  The Environment and Directed Technical Change , 2009, The American economic review.

[30]  David Popp,et al.  Where Does Energy R&D Come from? Examining Crowding Out from Environmentally-Friendly R&D , 2009 .

[31]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th-Century America , 1998 .

[32]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[33]  Ilian Iliev,et al.  Who Owns Our Low Carbon Future?: Intellectual Property and Energy Technologies , 2009 .

[34]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Applicant and Examiner Citations in US Patents: An Overview and Analysis , 2008 .

[35]  A. Jaffe,et al.  A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy , 2005 .

[36]  Elena Verdolini,et al.  Efficiency Improving Fossil Fuel Technologies for Electricity Generation: Data Selection and Trends , 2011 .

[37]  D. Popp,et al.  Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts , 2008 .

[38]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[39]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor versus examiner citations in European patents , 2005 .