Psychophysical assessment of stimulation sites in auditory prosthesis electrode arrays

Auditory prostheses use implanted electrode arrays that permit stimulation at many sites along the tonotopic axis of auditory neurons. Psychophysical studies demonstrate that measures of implant function, such as detection and discrimination thresholds, vary considerably across these sites, that the across-site patterns of these measures differ across subjects, and that the likely mechanisms underlying this variability differ across measures. Psychophysical and speech recognition studies suggest that not all stimulation sites contribute equally to perception with the prosthesis and that some sites might have negative effects on perception. Studies that reduce the number of active stimulation sites indicate that most cochlear implant users can effectively utilize a maximum of only about seven sites in their processors. These findings support a strategy for improving implant performance by selecting only the best stimulation sites for the processor map. Another approach is to revise stimulation parameters for ineffective sites in an effort to improve acuity at those sites. In this paper, we discuss data supporting these approaches and some potential pitfalls.

[1]  D Sutton,et al.  Intensity discrimination with cochlear implants. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  R. Shannon Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  John C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Intraneural stimulation for auditory prosthesis: Modiolar trunk and intracranial stimulation sites , 2008, Hearing Research.

[4]  R. Battmer,et al.  Experience with the cochlear miniature speech processor in adults and children together with a comparison of unipolar and bipolar modes. , 1992, ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties.

[5]  F B Simmons,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. , 1966, Archives of otolaryngology.

[6]  B. Pfingst,et al.  Psychophysical Metrics and Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users , 2005, Audiology and Neurotology.

[7]  Deniz Başkent,et al.  Frequency-place compression and expansion in cochlear implant listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  M Pelizzone,et al.  Low-pass filtering in amplitude modulation detection associated with vowel and consonant identification in subjects with cochlear implants. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Robert V. Shannon,et al.  Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction , 1983, Hearing Research.

[11]  M. Demorest,et al.  Speech recognition at simulated soft, conversational, and raised-to-loud vocal efforts by adults with cochlear implants. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J. Lindsay,et al.  Profound deafness. Associated sensory and neural degeneration. , 1980, Archives of otolaryngology.

[13]  R V Shannon,et al.  Detection of gaps in sinusoids and pulse trains by patients with cochlear implants. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  J. Nadol,et al.  Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantation. , 1997, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[15]  M W Skinner,et al.  Comparison of two methods for selecting minimum stimulation levels used in programming the Nucleus 22 cochlear implant. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[16]  Robert V Shannon,et al.  Open Set Speech Perception with Auditory Brainstem Implant? , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[17]  Michael Tykocinski,et al.  Threshold, Comfortable Level and Impedance Changes as a Function of Electrode-Modiolar Distance , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[18]  Chris van den Honert,et al.  Effect of electrode configuration on psychophysical forward masking in cochlear implant listeners. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  S. S. Stevens On Hearing by Electrical Stimulation , 1937 .

[20]  R. V. Hoesel,et al.  Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users. , 2007 .

[21]  Gregory Valentini,et al.  Implications of Deep Electrode Insertion on Cochlear Implant Fitting , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[22]  Charles W. Parkins,et al.  A model of electrical excitation of the mammalian auditory-nerve neuron , 1987, Hearing Research.

[23]  Hubert H. Lim,et al.  Spatially Distinct Functional Output Regions within the Central Nucleus of the Inferior Colliculus: Implications for an Auditory Midbrain Implant , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  B. Moore,et al.  Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in noise , 1993 .

[25]  F.A. Spelman,et al.  A method for determining the driving currents for focused stimulation in the cochlea , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  John C Middlebrooks,et al.  Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Robert V. Shannon,et al.  Holes in Hearing , 2002, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[28]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings , 1984, Hearing Research.

[29]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  Effects of Stimulation Rate, Mode and Level on Modulation Detection by Cochlear Implant Users , 2005, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[30]  Q. Fu Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users , 2002, Neuroreport.

[31]  Bryan E. Pfingst,et al.  Across-Site Threshold Variation in Cochlear Implants: Relation to Speech Recognition , 2004, Audiology and Neurotology.

[32]  Q J Fu,et al.  Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  R. Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  B. Pfingst,et al.  Effects of level on nonspectral frequency difference limens for electrical and acoustic stimuli , 1990, Hearing Research.

[35]  Dirk Van Compernolle Speech processing strategies for a multichannel cochlear prosthesis , 1985 .

[36]  J J Hanekom,et al.  Gap detection as a measure of electrode interaction in cochlear implants. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Alexandra Kaider,et al.  Cochlear Implant Channel Separation and Its Influence on Speech Perception – Implications for a New Electrode Design , 2007, Audiology and Neurotology.

[38]  Bryan E. Pfingst,et al.  Across-Site Variation in Detection Thresholds and Maximum Comfortable Loudness Levels for Cochlear Implants , 2004, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[39]  Frank Rattay,et al.  A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. II. Influence of the three-dimensional cochlear structure on neural excitability , 2001, Hearing Research.

[40]  Chris van den Honert,et al.  Focused intracochlear electric stimulation with phased array channels. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[42]  Li Xu,et al.  Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  R. Snyder,et al.  Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I: Expansion of central representation , 1990, Hearing Research.

[44]  L. Aitkin The auditory midbrain , 1979, Trends in Neurosciences.

[45]  R. Shannon Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics , 1983, Hearing Research.

[46]  Donald K. Eddington,et al.  Quantitative Evaluation of New Bone and Fibrous Tissue in the Cochlea following Cochlear Implantation in the Human , 2007, Audiology and Neurotology.

[47]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Auditory Prosthesis with a Penetrating Nerve Array , 2007, Journal for the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[48]  R. V. van Hoesel,et al.  Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  Leslie M Collins,et al.  Effects of stimulus level on electrode-place discrimination in human subjects with cochlear implants , 1999, Hearing Research.

[50]  L M Collins,et al.  Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  B M Clopton,et al.  Effects of electrical current configuration on potential fields in the electrically stimulated cochlea: field models and measurements. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[52]  Rainer Klinke,et al.  Response Characteristics of Nerve Fibers to Patterned Electrical Stimulation , 1990 .

[53]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. II: Temporal properties of neurons in the inferior colliculus , 1991, Hearing Research.

[54]  D. McCreery,et al.  Cochlear nucleus auditory prostheses , 2008, Hearing Research.

[55]  Teresa A. Zwolan,et al.  Effects of stimulus configuration on psychophysical operating levels and on speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1997, Hearing Research.

[56]  S J Norton,et al.  Estimation of Psychophysical Levels Using the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Measured with the Neural Response Telemetry Capabilities of Cochlear Corporation’s CI24M Device , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[57]  Teresa A. Zwolan,et al.  Effects of stimulus level on nonspectral frequency discrimination by human subjects , 1994, Hearing Research.

[58]  R. Shannon,et al.  Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  R. Shannon,et al.  Within-channel gap detection using dissimilar markers in cochlear implant listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  Effect of current level on electrode discrimination in electrical stimulation , 1999, Hearing Research.

[61]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  The auditory midbrain implant: Effects of electrode location , 2008, Hearing Research.

[62]  Charles A. Miller,et al.  Auditory response to intracochlear electric stimuli following furosemide treatment , 2003, Hearing Research.

[63]  Bryan E. Pfingst,et al.  Effects of Stimulus Level on Speech Perception with Cochlear Prostheses , 2003, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[64]  S A Telian,et al.  Patient performance with the Cochlear Corporation "20 + 2" implant: bipolar versus monopolar activation. , 1996, The American journal of otology.

[65]  J. Fayad,et al.  Multichannel Cochlear Implants: Relation of Histopathology to Performance , 2006, The Laryngoscope.

[66]  D. J. Morris,et al.  Effects of Electrode Configuration and Stimulus Level on Rate and Level Discrimination with Cochlear Implants , 2000, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[67]  G S Donaldson,et al.  Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[68]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[69]  Julie Arenberg Bierer,et al.  Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[70]  G M Clark,et al.  Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant subjects. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[71]  G S Donaldson,et al.  Intensity discrimination as a function of stimulus level with electric stimulation. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[72]  Bryan E Pfingst,et al.  Effects of carrier pulse rate and stimulation site on modulation detection by subjects with cochlear implants. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[73]  K. Kawamoto,et al.  Electromotile hearing: acoustic tones mask psychophysical response to high-frequency electrical stimulation of intact guinea pig cochleae. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[74]  Robert V Shannon,et al.  Multichannel auditory brainstem implant: update on performance in 61 patients. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[75]  Frank Rattay,et al.  A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes , 2001, Hearing Research.