Integrative graph regularized matrix factorization for drug-pathway associations analysis

Pathway-based drug discovery can give full consideration to the efficacy of compounds in the systemic physiological environment. The recently emerged drug-pathway association identification approaches gain popularity due to its potential to decipher the mechanism of action and the targets of compounds. In this study, we propose a novel drug-pathway association identification method: Integrative Graph regularized Matrix Factorization (IGMF). It employs graph regularization to encode data geometrical information and prevent possible overfitting in prediction. Furthermore, it achieves parts-based and sparse data representation by imposing L1-norm regularization on the objective function. Empirical studies demonstrate that IGMF has strong advantages in identifying more new drug-pathway associations compared to its peer methods. It further shows a good capability to unveil the intrinsic structures of data. As an effective drug-pathway discovery method, it will inspire new analytics methods in this subfield.

[1]  Mingqiu Wang,et al.  Adaptive group bridge estimation for high-dimensional partially linear models , 2017, Journal of inequalities and applications.

[2]  Junfeng Xia,et al.  Identification of mutated driver pathways in cancer using a multi-objective optimization model , 2016, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[3]  B. Ganter,et al.  Emerging applications of network and pathway analysis in drug discovery and development. , 2008, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[4]  David S. Wishart,et al.  DrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolism , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  R. D. De Abreu,et al.  Effects of methotrexate on purine and pyrimidine metabolism and cell-kinetic parameters in human malignant lymphoblasts of different lineages. , 1988, Biochemical pharmacology.

[6]  P. Valent,et al.  Identification of basophils as a major source of hepatocyte growth factor in chronic myeloid leukemia: a novel mechanism of BCR-ABL1-independent disease progression. , 2012, Neoplasia.

[7]  Adam A. Margolin,et al.  The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modeling of anticancer drug sensitivity , 2012, Nature.

[8]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Improved sparse representation with low-rank representation for robust face recognition , 2016, Neurocomputing.

[9]  Hongyu Zhao,et al.  iFad: an integrative factor analysis model for drug-pathway association inference , 2012, Bioinform..

[10]  Ying Guo,et al.  A Robust Manifold Graph Regularized Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Algorithm for Cancer Gene Clustering , 2017, Molecules.

[11]  Hongyu Zhao,et al.  FacPad: Bayesian sparse factor modeling for the inference of pathways responsive to drug treatment , 2012, Bioinform..

[12]  Srinivas Annavarapu,et al.  Combination of the histone deacetylase inhibitor LBH589 and the hsp90 inhibitor 17-AAG is highly active against human CML-BC cells and AML cells with activating mutation of FLT-3. , 2005, Blood.

[13]  Damian Szklarczyk,et al.  STITCH 4: integration of protein–chemical interactions with user data , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  Natalia Novac,et al.  Challenges and opportunities of drug repositioning. , 2013, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[15]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Graph Regularized Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Data Representation. , 2011, IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence.

[16]  D. Marin,et al.  KIR2DS1 genotype predicts for complete cytogenetic response and survival in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib , 2012, Leukemia.

[17]  P. Marynen,et al.  In vitro validation of γ-secretase inhibitors alone or in combination with other anti-cancer drugs for the treatment of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia , 2008, Haematologica.

[18]  Costas S. Iliopoulos,et al.  An algorithm for mapping short reads to a dynamically changing genomic sequence , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM).