The design ontology: foundation for the design knowledge exchange and management

The article presents the research of the nature, building and practical role of a Design Ontology as a potential framework for the more efficient product development (PD) data-, information- and knowledge- description, -explanation, -understanding and -reusing. In the methodology for development of the ontology two steps could be identified: empirical research and computer implementation. Empirical research has included domain documentation analysis (Genetic Design Model System developed by Mortensen 1999), identification of the key concepts and relations between them, and categorisation of the concepts and relations into taxonomies. As an epistemological foundation for the concepts formalisation, The Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO) proposed by IEEE, was reused. As the result of the previously described process, the ontology content has been categorised into six main subcategories divided between physical and abstract world. As a next step the computer thesaurus has been created. Using the thesauri, the knowledge evolved during the PD has been described, and the set of the created concepts and relations instances has been used for the ontology model consistency checking and refinement. The Design Ontology was evaluated through test product examples and based on this evaluation and proposed implementation framework further research steps are proposed.

[1]  Alan Gilchrist,et al.  Thesauri, taxonomies and ontologies - an etymological note , 2003, J. Documentation.

[2]  Reiner Anderl,et al.  Advanced Modelling for CAD/CAM Systems , 1991, Research Reports ESPRIT.

[3]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  A process-based approach to computer-supported engineering design , 1994 .

[4]  Michael Gruninger,et al.  Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies , 1995, IJCAI 1995.

[5]  Jean-Pierre Bourey,et al.  AN UML MODELING OF AN ARCHITECTURE FOR KNOWLEDGE DOCUMENTATION , 2003 .

[6]  Ken M. Wallace,et al.  A Methodology for Creating Ontologies for Engineering Design , 2007, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[7]  Philip Smith Roger Bakeman John M. Gottman , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  Vladimir Hubka Theorie der Konstruktionsprozesse , 1976 .

[9]  Michael Uschold,et al.  Ontologies: principles, methods and applications , 1996, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[10]  Saeema Ahmed,et al.  Encouraging reuse of design knowledge: a method to index knowledge , 2005 .

[11]  Filippo A. Salustri,et al.  TOWARDS A FORMAL THEORY OF PRODUCTS INCLUDING MEREOLOGY , 1999 .

[12]  Mario Štorga,et al.  TRACEABILITY IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 2004 .

[13]  Tetsuo Tomiyama,et al.  Advanced Engineering Informatics , 2007, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[14]  Mogens Myrup Andreasen,et al.  Two approaches to synthesis based on the domain theory , 2002 .

[15]  Vladimir Hubka,et al.  Theory of Technical Systems , 1988 .

[16]  Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.  Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project , 1990 .

[17]  Riichiro Mizoguchi,et al.  Ontology-based systematization of functional knowledge , 2004 .

[18]  W. N. Borst,et al.  Construction of Engineering Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing and Reuse , 1997 .

[19]  Steffen Staab,et al.  OntoEdit: Collaborative Ontology Development for the Semantic Web , 2002, SEMWEB.

[20]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis , 1986 .

[21]  Vladimir Hubka,et al.  Practical Studies in Systematic Design , 1988 .

[22]  W. E. Eder,et al.  Theory of Technical Systems: A Total Concept Theory for Engineering Design , 1988 .

[23]  斉藤 康己,et al.  Douglas B. Lenat and R. V. Guha : Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems, Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project, Addison-Wesley (1990). , 1990 .

[24]  Dorian Marjanović,et al.  Modelling the Relation Network in the Integrated Product and Design Process Model , 2002 .

[25]  Ahmad Kayed,et al.  Extracting ontological concepts for tendering conceptual structures , 2002, Data Knowl. Eng..

[26]  Mogens Myrup Andreasen,et al.  Complexity of product development context , 2004 .

[27]  Martin L. King,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Building Ontologies , 1995 .

[28]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[29]  Michael A. Rosenman,et al.  Purpose and function in design: from the socio-cultural to the techno-physical , 1998 .

[30]  Hideaki Takeda,et al.  Metamodel: A key to intelligent CAD systems , 1989 .

[31]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies: Where is their meeting point? , 2003, Data Knowl. Eng..

[32]  Adam Pease,et al.  Origins of The IEEE Standard Upper Ontology , 2004 .

[33]  Alison McKay,et al.  Relationships in Product Structures , 2004 .

[34]  Alex H. B. Duffy,et al.  Towards an ontology of generic engineering design activities , 2003 .

[35]  Mike Uschold,et al.  A Framework for Understanding and Classifying Ontology Applications , 1999 .

[36]  Mansur J. Darlington,et al.  Investigating ontology development for engineering design support , 2008, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[37]  Andreas Abecker,et al.  Toward a Technology for Organizational Memories , 1998, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[38]  F. Dikker,et al.  Integrating Standards and Synthesis Knowledge Using the YMIR Ontology , 1994 .