Social norms, information, and trust among strangers: theory and evidence

Can a social norm of trust and reciprocity emerge among strangers? We investigate this question by examining behavior in an experiment where subjects repeatedly play a two-player binary “trust” game. Players are randomly and anonymously paired with one another in each period. The main questions addressed are whether a social norm of trust and reciprocity emerges under the most extreme information restriction (anonymous community-wide enforcement) or whether trust and reciprocity require additional, individual-specific information about a player’s past history of play and whether that information must be provided freely or at some cost. In the absence of such reputational information, we find that a social norm of trust and reciprocity is difficult to sustain. The provision of reputational information on past individual decisions significantly increases trust and reciprocity, with longer histories yielding the best outcomes. Importantly, we find that making reputational information available at a small cost may also lead to a significant improvement in trust and reciprocity, despite the fact that most subjects do not choose to purchase this information.

[1]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  Cooperation Among Strangers with Limited Information About Reputation , 2003 .

[2]  K. Arrow,et al.  The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics , 2020 .

[3]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  How Effective are Online Reputation Mechanisms? An Experimental Study , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[4]  A. Greif Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: the Maghribi Traders' Coalition , 1993 .

[5]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition , 2000 .

[6]  Gary Charness,et al.  Trust and Trustworthiness Reputations in an Investment Game , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[7]  Jim Engle-Warnick,et al.  Learning to trust in indefinitely repeated games , 2006, Games Econ. Behav..

[8]  Martin Brown,et al.  Credit Reporting, Relationship Banking, and Loan Repayment , 2006 .

[9]  G. Camera,et al.  Cooperation among Strangers under the Shadow of the Future , 2009 .

[10]  Jim Engle-Warnick,et al.  Inferring repeated-game strategies from actions: evidence from trust game experiments , 2006 .

[11]  Gary E. Bolton How Effective are Electronic Reputation Mechanisms , 2003 .

[12]  Claudia Keser,et al.  Experimental games for the design of reputation management systems , 2003, IBM Syst. J..

[13]  Joyce E. Berg,et al.  Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History , 1995 .

[14]  Glenn Ellison Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma with Anonymous Random Matching , 1994 .

[15]  E. Fehr A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[16]  H. Young,et al.  Social Norms , 2020, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[17]  Michihiro Kandori Social Norms and Community Enforcement , 1992 .

[18]  Andrew Postlewaite,et al.  Social Norms and Random Matching Games , 1995 .

[19]  John Duffy,et al.  Cooperative behavior and the frequency of social interaction , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[20]  U. Fischbacher z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[21]  Joyce E. Berg,et al.  Trust, reciprocity and social history’, Games and Economic Behaviour, . , 1995 .

[22]  A. Greif Reputation and Coalitions in Medieval Trade: Evidence on the Maghribi Traders , 1989, The Journal of Economic History.

[23]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The role of institutions in the revival of trade: the law merchant , 1990 .

[24]  Social norms, cooperation and inequality , 2001 .

[25]  Andreas Birk,et al.  Learning to Trust , 2000, Trust in Cyber-societies.

[26]  Colin Camerer Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .