Invariance of brain-wave representations of simple visual images and their names.

In two experiments, electric brain waves of 14 subjects were recorded under several different conditions to study the invariance of brain-wave representations of simple patches of colors and simple visual shapes and their names, the words blue, circle, etc. As in our earlier work, the analysis consisted of averaging over trials to create prototypes and test samples, to both of which Fourier transforms were applied, followed by filtering and an inverse transformation to the time domain. A least-squares criterion of fit between prototypes and test samples was used for classification. The most significant results were these. By averaging over different subjects, as well as trials, we created prototypes from brain waves evoked by simple visual images and test samples from brain waves evoked by auditory or visual words naming the visual images. We correctly recognized from 60% to 75% of the test-sample brain waves. The general conclusion is that simple shapes such as circles and single-color displays generate brain waves surprisingly similar to those generated by their verbal names. These results, taken together with extensive psychological studies of auditory and visual memory, strongly support the solution proposed for visual shapes, by Bishop Berkeley and David Hume in the 18th century, to the long-standing problem of how the mind represents simple abstract ideas.

[1]  D J Mewhort,et al.  On familiarity effects in visual information processing. , 1980, Canadian journal of psychology.

[2]  G Tiberghien,et al.  Models of human memory. , 1989, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. Supplement.

[3]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Monitoring and storage of irrelevant messages in selective attention , 1964 .

[4]  George Berkeley,et al.  principles of human knowledge , 2019, Berkeley.

[5]  P Suppes,et al.  Invariance between subjects of brain wave representations of language. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  David Hume A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects , 1972 .

[7]  P Suppes,et al.  Brain wave recognition of words. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  P Suppes,et al.  Brain-wave recognition of sentences. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Eileen Kowler Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[10]  J S Brown,et al.  Tests of a model of informational persistence. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[11]  N. Cowan Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[12]  R. Conrad,et al.  Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. , 1964 .

[13]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Iconic memory and visible persistence , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  G. Sperling,et al.  Successive approximations to a model for short term memory. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[15]  W. A. Phillips On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory , 1974 .

[16]  V Di Lollo,et al.  Effects of display luminance, stimulus meaningfulness, and probe duration on visible and schematic persistence. , 1991, Canadian journal of psychology.

[17]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Associative strength theory of recognition memory for pitch , 1969 .

[18]  Moyra Williams,et al.  New Horizons in Psychology , 1966, Mental Health.