Creating a literature database of low-calorie sweeteners and health studies: evidence mapping

BackgroundEvidence mapping is an emerging tool used to systematically identify, organize and summarize the quantity and focus of scientific evidence on a broad topic, but there are currently no methodological standards. Using the topic of low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) and selected health outcomes, we describe the process of creating an evidence-map database and demonstrate several example descriptive analyses using this database.MethodsThe process of creating an evidence-map database is described in detail. The steps include: developing a comprehensive literature search strategy, establishing study eligibility criteria and a systematic study selection process, extracting data, developing outcome groups with input from expert stakeholders and tabulating data using descriptive analyses. The database was uploaded onto SRDR™ (Systematic Review Data Repository), an open public data repository.ResultsOur final LCS evidence-map database included 225 studies, of which 208 were interventional studies and 17 were cohort studies. An example bubble plot was produced to display the evidence-map data and visualize research gaps according to four parameters: comparison types, population baseline health status, outcome groups, and study sample size. This plot indicated a lack of studies assessing appetite and dietary intake related outcomes using LCS with a sugar intake comparison in people with diabetes.ConclusionEvidence mapping is an important tool for the contextualization of in-depth systematic reviews within broader literature and identifies gaps in the evidence base, which can be used to inform future research. An open evidence-map database has the potential to promote knowledge translation from nutrition science to policy.

[1]  G. Antes,et al.  Methoden des Evidence Mappings , 2013, Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz.

[2]  Maria J Grant,et al.  A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.

[3]  Sarah E. Hetrick Ma DPsych PGCertHSc,et al.  Evidence mapping: illustrating an emerging methodology to improve evidence-based practice in youth mental health , 2010 .

[4]  Carla E. Brodley,et al.  Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center: abstrackr , 2012, IHI '12.

[5]  D. Weed,et al.  Evidence mapping: methodologic foundations and application to intervention and observational research on sugar-sweetened beverages and health outcomes. , 2013, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[6]  P. Miller,et al.  Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies123 , 2014, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[7]  A. Drewnowski,et al.  Consensus statement on benefits of low-calorie sweeteners , 2014 .

[8]  E Motschall,et al.  [Methods of evidence mapping. A systematic review]. , 2013, Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz.

[9]  S. Swithers Artificial sweeteners produce the counterintuitive effect of inducing metabolic derangements , 2013, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.

[10]  H. Daudt,et al.  Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[11]  H. Arksey,et al.  Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .

[12]  Sarah E Hetrick,et al.  Evidence mapping: illustrating an emerging methodology to improve evidence-based practice in youth mental health. , 2010, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[13]  Evelina Chapman,et al.  Cochrane systematic reviews are useful to map research gaps for decreasing maternal mortality. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[14]  Meera Viswanathan,et al.  Framework for Considering Study Designs for Future Research Needs , 2012 .

[15]  Robin A. Paynter,et al.  Figure 1, AHRQ Effective Health Care Program: Points of stakeholder engagement for systematic reviews , 2014 .

[16]  Birte Snilstveit,et al.  Evidence Gap Maps - a Tool for Promoting Evidence-Informed Policy and Prioritizing Future Research , 2013 .

[17]  M. Chung,et al.  Emerging Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologies for Musculoskeletal Imaging Under Loading Stress: Scope of the Literature , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  M. Chung,et al.  Low‐Calorie Sweeteners and Health , 2015 .

[19]  Wang et al. , 2021 .

[20]  Emma Tavender,et al.  The Global Evidence Mapping Initiative: Scoping research in broad topic areas , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[21]  Robin A. Paynter,et al.  Defining the Benefits of Stakeholder Engagement in Systematic Reviews , 2014 .