How to improve static and fatigue strength in press-fitted joints using anaerobic adhesive

This study is focused on the static and fatigue strength of interference-fitted connections supplemented with anaerobic adhesive (hybrid joints). Through axial release tests, it is demonstrated that the addition of the adhesive always improves the performance of the joint. The main achievable benefits can be summarized in (a) the possibility of increasing the load transfer capability with the same joint geometry and (b) reducing both the weight and the stress field of the joint with the same load transfer capability. The objective of the study is to provide some relevant information on the static and fatigue strength properties in case of both steel–aluminium components (mixed hybrid joints) and steel–steel components (steel hybrid joints). Furthermore, the authors provide some design formulae useful to predict the releasing force (the strength of the joints) both under static and dynamic conditions. Relevant improvements can be obtained using the anaerobic adhesive in terms of releasing force, which increases at least of 40 per cent. The proposed results derive from a collection of 200 experimental tests performed by the authors on a high-strength, single-component adhesive, which cures anaerobically (LOCTITE 648®).

[1]  G. Bartolozzi,et al.  Research on shaft-hub adhesive and compresion coupling , 1999 .

[2]  J. Häberle,et al.  Mechanical properties of hub/shaft joints adhesively bonded and cured under hydrostatic pressure , 2007 .

[3]  Dario Croccolo,et al.  Friction Coefficient Definition in Compression-fit Couplings Applying the DOE Method , 2008 .

[4]  J. Comyn,et al.  Contact angles and adhesive bonding , 1992 .

[5]  Tezcan Sekercioglu,et al.  Shear strength estimation of adhesively bonded cylindrical components under static loading using the genetic algorithm approach , 2005 .

[6]  J. Comyn,et al.  Structural Adhesive Joints in Engineering , 1984, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[7]  Eugenio Dragoni,et al.  Cumulative static strength of tightened joints bonded with anaerobic adhesives , 2002 .

[8]  D. Croccolo,et al.  Adhesive defect density estimation applying the acoustic emission technique , 2009 .

[9]  H. Kawamura,et al.  Effect of fitted position on stress distribution and strength of a bonded shrink fitted joint subjected to torsion , 2003 .

[10]  Dario Croccolo,et al.  Static and dynamic strength evaluation of interference fit and adhesively bonded cylindrical joints , 2010 .

[11]  A. Gulsoz,et al.  The effects of bonding clearance and interference fit on the strength of adhesively bonded cylindrical components , 2005 .

[12]  A. Koewius ALUMINIUM-SPACEFRAME-TECHNOLOGIE : DER LEICHTBAU DES SERIEN-AUTOMOBILS ERREICHT EINE NEUE DIMENSION. I , 1994 .

[13]  Robert D. Adams,et al.  Joint strength predictions for adhesive joints to be used over a wide temperature range , 2007 .

[14]  Dario Croccolo,et al.  A methodology to estimate the adhesive bonding defects and the final releasing moments in conical joints based on the acoustic emissions technique , 2006 .

[15]  Dario Croccolo,et al.  A generalized theory for shaft—hub couplings , 2009 .

[16]  Dario Croccolo,et al.  Recent improvements and design formulae applied to front motorbike suspensions , 2010 .

[17]  A. Gulsoz,et al.  The effects of surface roughness on the strength of adhesively bonded cylindrical components , 2003 .

[18]  C. Borsellino,et al.  Adhesive joining of aluminium AA6082: The effects of resin and surface treatment , 2009 .

[19]  E. Dragoni,et al.  Intrinsic static strength of friction interfaces augmented with anaerobic adhesives , 2000 .

[20]  G. Romanos Strength evaluation of axisymmetric bonded joints using anaerobic adhesives , 1999 .