Early Results from GLASS-JWST. VIII. An Extremely Magnified Blue Supergiant Star at Redshift 2.65 in the A2744 Cluster Field

We report the discovery of an extremely magnified star at redshift z = 2.65 in the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) NIRISS pre-imaging of the A2744 galaxy-cluster field. The star’s background host galaxy lies on a fold caustic of the foreground lens, and the cluster creates a pair of images of the region close to the lensed star. We identified the bright transient in one of the merging images at a distance of ∼0.″15 from the critical curve by subtracting the JWST F115W and F150W imaging from coadditions of archival Hubble Space Telescope (HST) F105W and F125W images and F140W and F160W images, respectively. Since the time delay between the two images should be only hours, the transient must be the microlensing event of an individual star, as opposed to a luminous stellar explosion that would persist for days to months. Analysis of individual exposures suggests that the star’s magnification is not changing rapidly during the observations. From photometry of the point source through the F115W, F150W, and F200W filters, we identify a strong Balmer break, and modeling allows us to constrain the star’s temperature to be approximately 7000–12,000 K.

[1]  A. Zitrin,et al.  An Efficient Method for Simulating Light Curves of Cosmological Microlensing and Caustic Crossing Events , 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[2]  F. Timmes,et al.  A highly magnified star at redshift 6.2 , 2022, Nature.

[3]  B. Frye,et al.  Highly Magnified Stars in Lensing Clusters: New Evidence in a Galaxy Lensed by MACS J0416.1-2403 , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[4]  Nick Kaiser,et al.  Searching for Highly Magnified Stars at Cosmological Distances: Discovery of a Redshift 0.94 Blue Supergiant in Archival Images of the Galaxy Cluster MACS J0416.1-2403 , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[5]  F. Timmes,et al.  On the Observability of Individual Population III Stars and Their Stellar-mass Black Hole Accretion Disks through Cluster Caustic Transits , 2018, 1903.06527.

[6]  J. Diego,et al.  Dark Matter under the Microscope: Constraining Compact Dark Matter with Caustic Crossing Events , 2017, 1706.10281.

[7]  R. Bouwens,et al.  Strong-lensing analysis of A2744 with MUSE and Hubble Frontier Fields images , 2017, 1702.06962.

[8]  M. Oguri,et al.  Size–Luminosity Relations and UV Luminosity Functions at z = 6–9 Simultaneously Derived from the Complete Hubble Frontier Fields Data , 2017, 1710.07301.

[9]  B. Weiner,et al.  Two peculiar fast transients in a strongly lensed host galaxy , 2017, 1707.02434.

[10]  J. Kneib,et al.  Extreme magnification of an individual star at redshift 1.5 by a galaxy-cluster lens , 2017, 1706.10279.

[11]  J. Miralda-Escud'e,et al.  Microlensing of Extremely Magnified Stars near Caustics of Galaxy Clusters , 2017, 1707.00003.

[12]  J. Anderson,et al.  The Frontier Fields: Survey Design and Initial Results , 2016, 1605.06567.

[13]  L. Williams,et al.  Testing light-traces-mass in Hubble Frontier Fields Cluster MACS-J0416.1-240 , 2015, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union.

[14]  A. Fontana,et al.  Multiple images of a highly magnified supernova formed by an early-type cluster galaxy lens , 2014, Science.

[15]  M. Sereno,et al.  A free-form lensing grid solution for A1689 with new multiple images , 2014, 1402.4170.

[16]  O. Absil,et al.  SOUTHERN MASSIVE STARS AT HIGH ANGULAR RESOLUTION: OBSERVATIONAL CAMPAIGN AND COMPANION DETECTION , 2014, 1409.6304.

[17]  C. McCully,et al.  A new hybrid framework to efficiently model lines of sight to gravitational lenses , 2013, 1401.0197.

[18]  C. Evans,et al.  Binary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars , 2012, Science.

[19]  Neil Rowlands,et al.  The JWST Fine Guidance Sensor (FGS) and Near-Infrared Imager and Slitless Spectrograph (NIRISS) , 2012, Other Conferences.

[20]  J. Rhodes,et al.  Creation of cosmic structure in the complex galaxy cluster merger Abell 2744 , 2011, 1103.2772.

[21]  C. Keeton.  On modeling galaxy-scale strong lens systems , 2010 .

[22]  M. Oguri.  The Mass Distribution of SDSS J1004$+$4112 Revisited , 2010, 1005.3103.

[23]  D. Coe,et al.  New Multiply-Lensed Galaxies Identified in ACS/NIC3 Observations of Cl0024+1654, Using an Improved Mass Model , 2009, 0902.3971.

[24]  M. Meneghetti,et al.  Combining weak and strong cluster lensing: applications to simulations and MS 2137 , 2008, 0806.1967.

[25]  J. Kneib,et al.  A Bayesian approach to strong lensing modelling of galaxy clusters , 2007, 0706.0048.

[26]  Max Tegmark,et al.  Combined reconstruction of weak and strong lensing data with WSLAP , 2005, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[27]  H. Dejonghe,et al.  A genetic algorithm for the non-parametric inversion of strong lensing systems , 2006, astro-ph/0601124.

[28]  M. Lombardi,et al.  Strong and weak lensing united I: the combined strong and weak lensing cluster mass reconstruction method , 2004, astro-ph/0410643.

[29]  Max Tegmark,et al.  Non-parametric inversion of strong lensing systems , 2004, astro-ph/0408418.

[30]  J. Diego,et al.  Non-parametric mass reconstruction of A1689 from strong lensing data with SLAP , 2004, astro-ph/0412191.

[31]  Geoffrey C. Clayton,et al.  A Quantitative Comparison of SMC, LMC, and Milky Way UV to NIR Extinction Curves , 2003, astro-ph/0305257.

[32]  France.,et al.  A standard stellar library for evolutionary synthesis - II. The M dwarf extension , 1997, astro-ph/9710350.

[33]  J. Miralda-Escudé.  The magnification of stars crossing a caustic. I - Lenses with smooth potentials , 1991 .

[34]  J. Mathis,et al.  The relationship between infrared, optical, and ultraviolet extinction , 1989 .

[35]  J. B. Oke,et al.  Secondary standard stars for absolute spectrophotometry , 1983 .

[36]  L. Lucy.  An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions , 1974 .