Reproducibility and accuracy of measurements with a hand held autorefractor in children

AIM To determine reproducibility and accuracy of the Nikon Retinomax autorefractor when used with children who were made cycloplegic. METHODS Autorefraction and retinoscopy or subjectively refined retinoscopy (where, under the patient’s direction, the refraction was varied until the best visual acuity was achieved) were performed on the right eye of 47 children, age 11–93 months. Autorefraction was performed using the Nikon Retinomax, which provides up to eight measured values of refractive error and one representative measurement of refractive error. RESULTS Autorefractor measurements were successfully obtained from 7/9 children age 3 years or younger, and from all older children. Vector methods were used to calculate differences. Retinomax reproducibility averaged 0.43 D. Unbiased Retinomax and retinoscopy measurements differed by an average of 0.82 D. Unbiased Retinomax and subjectively refined retinoscopy differed by an average of 1.03 D. CONCLUSIONS Reproducibility of Retinomax measured values in children is comparable with reproducibility of retino scopy, subjective refraction, and autorefraction measurements in adults. Agreement between Retinomax and retinoscopy and agreement between Retinomax and subjective refinement in children is comparable with agreement between autorefraction and subjective refraction in adults. The study indicates that the Retinomax is a useful instrument for measuring refractive errors in young children.

[1]  W F Long,et al.  A Matrix Formalism for Decentration Problems* , 1976, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[2]  A. Safir,et al.  Studies in refraction. I. The precision of retinoscopy. , 1970, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  G. Jacobsen,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 500 autorefractor and the Nidek AR-1000 autorefractor. , 1996, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  A J Adams,et al.  The repeatability of measurement of the ocular components. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  J. Sjöstrand,et al.  Anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia in the age group 2 years and above: a prospective study of the results of treatment. , 1991, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  R D Freeman,et al.  A Neural Effect of Partial Visual Deprivation in Humans , 1972, Science.

[7]  M. Rosenfield,et al.  Repeatability of Subjective and Objective Refraction , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[8]  J. Atkinson The prediction and prevention of strabismus and amblyopia achieved in the Cambridge infant photorefraction screening programme , 1989 .

[9]  B. Billingham,et al.  Can retinoscopy be used to screen infants for amblyopia? A longitudinal study of refraction in the first year of life , 1992, Eye.

[10]  W F Harris Algebra of Sphero‐Cylinders and Refractive Errors, and Their Means, Variance, and Standard Deviation , 1988, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[11]  S. Cobb,et al.  Resolution acuity in astigmats: evidence for a critical period in the human visual system. , 1978, The British journal of physiological optics.

[12]  R D Freeman,et al.  Meridional amblyopia: evidence for modification of the human visual system by early visual experience. , 1973, Vision research.

[13]  R. Ingram,et al.  Screening for refractive errors at age 1 year: a pilot study. , 1979, The British journal of ophthalmology.