P300 and stimulus categorization: two plus one is not so different from one plus one.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. R. Hughes. Multidisciplinary perspectives in event-related brain potential research , 1980 .
[2] R. Hyman. Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.
[3] Constance Duncan Johnson,et al. The P300 Component of The Cortical Event-Related Potential as an Index of Subjective Probability and Processing Duration , 1978 .
[4] P. Bertelson,et al. Serial Choice Reaction-time as a Function of Response versus Signal-and-Response Repetition , 1965, Nature.
[5] K. B. Campbell,et al. Evoked potential correlates of human information processing , 1979, Biological Psychology.
[6] N. Kirby,et al. Sequential effects of serial reaction time. , 1972 .
[7] B S Kopell,et al. Effects of stimulus probability and task-relevance on event-related potentials. , 1976, Psychophysiology.
[8] B. J. Winer. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .
[9] E Donchin,et al. The time constant in P300 recording. , 1979, Psychophysiology.
[10] W. Dixon. BMD : biomedical computer programs , 1967 .
[11] E. Donchin,et al. On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. , 1977, Psychophysiology.
[12] E Donchin,et al. Beyond averaging: the use of discriminant functions to recognize event related potentials elicited by single auditory stimuli. , 1976, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[13] Donald Laming,et al. Subjective probability in choice-reaction experiments ☆ , 1969 .
[14] W. Ritter,et al. Cortical evoked potentials elicited by real speech words and human sounds. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[15] S A Hillyard,et al. P3 waves to the discrimination of targets in homogeneous and heterogeneous stimulus sequences. , 1977, Psychophysiology.
[16] Emanuel Donchin,et al. Minicomputers in the signal-averaging laboratory. , 1975 .
[17] N. Kirby. Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time: automatic facilitation or subjective expectancy? , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[18] E Courchesne,et al. Changes in P3 waves with event repetition: long-term effects on scalp distribution and amplitude. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[19] E Donchin,et al. Discriminant analysis in average evoked response studies: the study of single trial data. , 1969, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[20] J. Harris,et al. Habituatory response decrement in the intact organism. , 1943 .
[21] N. Squires,et al. The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. , 1976, Science.
[22] Christopher D. Wickens,et al. The effects of stimulus sequence on event related potentials: A comparison of visual and auditory sequences , 1977 .
[23] P. Bertelson. Sequential Redundancy and Speed in a Serial Two-Choice Responding Task , 1961 .
[24] S Sutton,et al. Quantitative evoked potential correlates of the probability of events. , 1970, Psychophysiology.
[25] H. Jasper,et al. Habituation of the arousal reaction. , 1956, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[26] Robert J. Remington,et al. Analysis of Sequential Effects for a Four-Choice Reaction Time Experiment. , 1971 .
[27] R. Remington. Analysis of sequential effects in choice reaction times. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.