Progress Toward Affordable High Fidelity Combustion Simulations for High-Speed Flows in Complex Geometries

Significant progress has been made in the development of subgrid scale (SGS) closures based on a filtered density function (FDF) for large eddy simulations (LES) of turbulent reacting flows. The FDF is the counterpart of the probability density function (PDF) method, which has proven effective in Reynolds-averaged simulations (RAS). However, while systematic progress is being made advancing the FDF models for relatively simple flows and lab-scale flames, the application of these methods in complex geometries and high speed, wall-bounded flows with shocks remains a challenge. The key difficulties are the significant computational cost associated with solving the FDF transport equation and numerically stiff finite-rate chemistry. For LES/FDF methods to make a more significant impact in practical applications a pragmatic approach must be taken that significantly reduces the computational cost while maintaining high modeling fidelity. An example of one such ongoing effort is at the NASA Langley Research Center, where the first generation FDF models, namely the scalar filtered mass density function (SFMDF), are being implemented into VULCAN, a production-quality RAS and LES solver widely used for design of high speed propulsion flowpaths. This effort leverages internal and external collaborations to reduce the overall computational cost of high fidelity simulations in VULCAN by: implementing the high order methods that allow reduction in the total number of computational cells without loss in accuracy; implementing first generation of high fidelity scalar PDF/FDF models applicable to high-speed compressible flows; coupling RAS/PDF and LES/FDF into a hybrid framework to efficiently and accurately model the effects of combustion in the vicinity of the walls; developing efficient Lagrangian particle tracking algorithms to support robust solutions of the FDF equations for high speed flows; and utilizing finite-rate chemistry parametrization, such as flamelet models, to reduce the number of transported reactive species and remove numerical stiffness. This paper briefly introduces the SFMDF model (highlighting key benefits and challenges), and discusses particle tracking for flows with shocks, the hybrid coupled RAS/PDF and LES/FDF model, flamelet generated manifolds (FGM) model, and the Irregularly Portioned Lagrangian Monte Carlo Finite Difference (IPLMCFD) methodology for scalable simulation of high-speed reacting compressible flows.

[1]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  Large eddy simulation of a turbulent nonpremixed piloted methane jet flame (Sandia Flame D) , 2004 .

[2]  Mitchell D. Smooke,et al.  Reduced Kinetic Mechanisms and Asymptotic Approximations for Methane-Air Flames: A Topical Volume , 1991 .

[3]  Gianluca Iaccarino,et al.  Characterizing the operability limits of the HyShot II scramjet through RANS simulations , 2011 .

[4]  J. Hank,et al.  The X-51A Scramjet Engine Flight Demonstration Program , 2008 .

[5]  Peyman Givi,et al.  Filtered Density Function for Subgrid Scale Modeling of Turbulent Combustion , 2006 .

[6]  Jacqueline H. Chen Petascale direct numerical simulation of turbulent combustion—fundamental insights towards predictive models , 2011 .

[7]  D. C. Haworth,et al.  A probability density function method for turbulent mixing and combustion on three-dimensional unstructured deforming meshes , 2000 .

[8]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  Filtered mass density function for large-eddy simulation of turbulent reacting flows , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  N. Adams,et al.  The approximate deconvolution model for large-eddy simulations of compressible flows and its application to shock-turbulent-boundary-layer interaction , 2001 .

[10]  Hans Werner Meuer,et al.  Top500 Supercomputer Sites , 1997 .

[11]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  Computationally efficient implementation of combustion chemistry using in situ adaptive tabulation , 1997 .

[12]  Vincent Giovangigli,et al.  Formulation of the premixed and nonpremixed test problems , 1991 .

[13]  Alan R. Kerstein,et al.  One-dimensional turbulence: vector formulation and application to free shear flows , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  W. Green,et al.  Redesigning combustion modeling algorithms for the Graphics Processing Unit (GPU): Chemical kinetic rate evaluation and ordinary differential equation integration , 2011 .

[15]  N. Peters Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion , 1984 .

[16]  Sharath S. Girimaji,et al.  Modeling temperature and species fluctuations in turbulent, reacting flow , 1994 .

[17]  Mehdi B. Nik,et al.  Scalar Filtered Density Function for Large Eddy Simulation of a Bunsen Burner , 2008 .

[18]  S. Pope Lagrangian PDF Methods for Turbulent Flows , 1994 .

[19]  Van Oijen,et al.  Modelling of Premixed Laminar Flames using Flamelet-Generated Manifolds , 2000 .

[20]  N. Adams,et al.  An approximate deconvolution procedure for large-eddy simulation , 1999 .

[21]  Guilhem Lacaze,et al.  A non-premixed combustion model based on flame structure analysis at supercritical pressures , 2012 .

[22]  Denis Veynante,et al.  Turbulent combustion modeling , 2002, VKI Lecture Series.

[23]  A. T. Hsu,et al.  Probability density function approach for compressible turbulent reacting flows , 1994 .

[24]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  EPVS-FMDF for les of high-speed turbulent flows , 2012 .

[25]  S. James,et al.  Large eddy simulations of turbulent flames using the filtered density function model , 2007 .

[26]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  Calculations of subsonic and supersonic turbulent reacting mixing layers using probability density function methods , 1998 .

[27]  Jinchao Xu,et al.  Assessment of Numerical Accuracy of PDF/Monte Carlo Methods for Turbulent Reacting Flows , 1999 .

[28]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  Local Time-Stepping Algorithm for Solving Probability Density Function Turbulence Model Equations , 2002 .

[29]  S. Pope,et al.  Filtered density function for large eddy simulation of turbulent reacting flows , 1998 .

[30]  Kevin Skadron,et al.  Scalable parallel programming , 2008, 2008 IEEE Hot Chips 20 Symposium (HCS).

[31]  P. Kloeden,et al.  Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations , 1992 .

[32]  E. Hawkes,et al.  Turbulent flame–wall interaction: a direct numerical simulation study , 2010, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[33]  Farhad A. Jaberi,et al.  Large-eddy simulations of turbulent methane jet flames with filtered mass density function , 2010 .

[34]  Sunil James,et al.  Lagrangian PDF Transport Method for Simulations of Axisymmetric Turbulent Reacting Flows , 2005 .

[35]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Eulerian transported probability density function sub-filter model for large-eddy simulations of turbulent combustion , 2006 .

[36]  Rodney O. Fox,et al.  A multienvironment conditional probability density function model for turbulent reacting flows , 2004 .

[37]  C. Law,et al.  Toward accommodating realistic fuel chemistry in large-scale computations , 2009 .

[38]  Johannes Janicka,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Combustion Systems , 2005 .

[39]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  Announcements, Comments, and Acknowledgments , 2011 .

[40]  M. Pino Martin,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. Part 1. Initialization and comparison with experiments , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[41]  Juan Pedro Mellado,et al.  Reconstruction subgrid models for nonpremixed combustion , 2003 .

[42]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  The hybrid method for the PDF equations of turbulent reactive flows: consistency conditions and correction algorithms , 2001 .

[43]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  The Hybrid Method for the PDF Equations of Turbulent Reactive Flows , 2002 .

[44]  Jack R. Edwards,et al.  Hybrid Simulation Approach for Cavity Flows: Blending, Algorithm, and Boundary Treatment Issues , 2003 .

[45]  van Ja Jeroen Oijen,et al.  Flamelet-generated manifolds : development and application to premixed laminar flames , 2002 .

[46]  C Cemil Bekdemir,et al.  Modeling Diesel engine combustion using pressure dependent Flamelet Generated Manifolds , 2011 .

[47]  Adrian Sandu,et al.  Multi-core acceleration of chemical kinetics for simulation and prediction , 2009, Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing Networking, Storage and Analysis.

[48]  Alan R. Kerstein,et al.  Linear-eddy modelling of turbulent transport. Part 3. Mixing and differential molecular diffusion in round jets , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[49]  John Shalf,et al.  The International Exascale Software Project roadmap , 2011, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..

[50]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  Velocity-scalar filtered mass density function for large eddy simulation of turbulent reacting flows , 2007 .

[51]  P. Moin,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flows , 1984 .

[52]  J. Philip Drummond,et al.  Development of Methods to Predict High-Speed Reacting Flows in Aerospace Propulsion Systems , 2012 .

[53]  S. Pope,et al.  Velocity filtered density function for large eddy simulation of turbulent flows , 2000 .

[54]  Lian Duan,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. Part 2. Effect of wall temperature , 2010, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[55]  Harsha K. Chelliah,et al.  Skeletal reaction models based on principal component analysis: Application to ethylene–air ignition, propagation, and extinction phenomena , 2011 .

[56]  P. Givi Model-free simulations of turbulent reactive flows , 1989 .

[57]  C. Gardiner Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[58]  Haifeng Wang,et al.  Weak second-order splitting schemes for Lagrangian Monte Carlo particle methods for the composition PDF/FDF transport equations , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[59]  C. Westbrook,et al.  A comprehensive modeling study of hydrogen oxidation , 2004 .

[60]  Lian Duan,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. Part 3. Effect of Mach number , 2011, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[61]  S. Pope PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows , 1985 .

[62]  S. Pope,et al.  A Consistent Hybrid Finite-Volume / Particle Method for the PDF Equations of Turbulent Reactive Flows , 2001 .

[63]  de Lph Philip Goey,et al.  Modeling of complex premixed burner systems by using flamelet-generated manifolds , 2001 .

[64]  M. S. Anand,et al.  Towards Improved Prediction of Aero-Engine Combustor Performance Using Large Eddy Simulations , 2008 .

[65]  Harsha K. Chelliah,et al.  Chemical Kinetic Model Reduction and Efficient Implementation Strategies for Hypersonic Propulsion Applications , 2012 .

[66]  George Karypis,et al.  Partitioning and Load Balancing for Emerging Parallel Applications and Architectures , 2006, Parallel Processing for Scientific Computing.

[67]  Mehdi B. Nik,et al.  Progress in Large Eddy Simulation of High Speed Turbulent Mixing and Reaction , 2009 .

[68]  Lian Duan,et al.  Assessment of Turbulence-Chemistry Interaction in Hypersonic Turbulent Boundary Layers , 2011 .

[69]  Alan R. Kerstein,et al.  A linear-eddy model of turbulent scalar transport and mixing , 1988 .

[70]  Peyman Givi,et al.  Developments in Formulation and Application of the Filtered Density Function , 2006 .

[71]  Gregory C. Burton,et al.  Multifractal subgrid-scale modeling for large-eddy simulation. I. Model development and a priori testing , 2005 .

[72]  Gregory C. Burton,et al.  Multifractal subgrid-scale modeling for large-eddy simulation. II. Backscatter limiting and a posteriori evaluation , 2005 .

[73]  E. O'brien,et al.  The probability density function (pdf) approach to reacting turbulent flows , 1980 .

[74]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  A particle formulation for treating differential diffusion in filtered density function methods , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[75]  Curtis Peebles,et al.  Road to Mach 10 : lessons learned from the X-43A flight research program , 2008 .

[76]  R. Borghi Turbulent combustion modelling , 1988 .

[77]  Mohammad Reza H. Sheikhi,et al.  Filtered density function simulator on unstructured meshes , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[78]  H. Pitsch LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION OF TURBULENT COMBUSTION , 2006 .

[79]  D. Haworth Progress in probability density function methods for turbulent reacting flows , 2010 .