Identification of material parameters for aluminum foam at high strain rate

This paper concerns on the aluminum foam material modeling and identification of constitutive parameters at high strain rates. Lured by its excellent energy absorption capacity under the impact conditions, aluminum foam has been widely used in automotive and aerospace industry as a lightweight filler material. Nevertheless, aluminum foam shows different mechanical properties at low and high plastic deformation rates, moreover, in the engineering practice, the occurrence of high strain rate appears more often than low strain rate. Generally speaking, to obtain the constitutive model parameters of aluminum foam material, a large number of expensive experiments need to be conducted. In addition, the plastic deformation behavior of aluminum foam at high strain rate follows a highly non-linear dynamic process, and its parameter identification requires much more complex numerical procedure. For these reasons, this paper proposes a new procedure to predict Deshpande and Fleck (DC) model parameters for aluminum foam based on successive artificial neural network (SANN) technique and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. Finite element analyses are performed by using Design of Experiment (DoE) method to establish the SANN model for each of the five constitutive parameters of the DC model. The constitutive model parameters with the minimum discrepancy between experimental and SANN curves are obtained by using the surrogate modeling and PSO methods. Finally, this approach is validated by comparing the FE modeling results against the experimental results. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of such a three phase identification procedure comprising experimentation, optimization, and verification. It provides a useful means for parametric identification of other similar lightweight foam or porous materials.

[1]  Zwe-Lee Gaing,et al.  A particle swarm optimization approach for optimum design of PID controller in AVR system , 2004 .

[2]  Qing Li,et al.  Optimization of foam-filled bitubal structures for crashworthiness criteria , 2012 .

[3]  G. Solomos,et al.  Empty and foam-filled circular aluminium tubes subjected to axial and oblique quasistatic loading , 2003 .

[4]  Uday K. Vaidya,et al.  Blast impact response of aluminum foam sandwich composites , 2006 .

[5]  Shiwei Zhou,et al.  Crashworthiness design for functionally graded foam-filled thin-walled structures , 2010 .

[6]  G. Y. Li,et al.  Identification of geometric parameters of drawbead in metal forming processes , 2006 .

[7]  O. Hopperstad,et al.  Validation of constitutive models applicable to aluminium foams , 2002 .

[8]  Guowei Ma,et al.  Modeling loading rate effect on crushing stress of metallic cellular materials , 2009 .

[9]  Michael N. Vrahatis,et al.  On the computation of all global minimizers through particle swarm optimization , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[10]  P. Fourie,et al.  The particle swarm optimization algorithm in size and shape optimization , 2002 .

[11]  Hongwei Song,et al.  Partition Energy Absorption of Axially Crushed Aluminum Foam-Filled Hat Sections , 2005 .

[12]  Masoud Rais-Rohani,et al.  A comparative study of metamodeling methods for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization , 2005 .

[13]  U. Ramamurty,et al.  Strain rate sensitivity of a closed-cell aluminum foam , 2000 .

[14]  H. R. Zarei,et al.  Optimization of the foam-filled aluminum tubes for crush box application , 2008 .

[15]  Noboru Kikuchi,et al.  Constitutive Modeling and Material Characterization of Polymeric Foams , 1997 .

[16]  J. Cirne,et al.  Dynamic axial crushing of short to long circular aluminium tubes with agglomerate cork filler , 2007 .

[17]  G. Gray,et al.  Plasticity and Damage in Aluminum Syntactic Foams Deformed under Dynamic and Quasi-Static Conditions , 2005 .

[18]  M. Langseth,et al.  Static crushing of square aluminium extrusions with aluminium foam filler , 1999 .

[19]  Qing Li,et al.  Identification of Material Parameters for High Strength Steel Under Impact Loading , 2011 .

[20]  Peter Myler,et al.  Finite element analysis of closed-cell aluminium foam under quasi-static loading , 2010 .

[21]  H. Zarei,et al.  Optimum honeycomb filled crash absorber design , 2008 .

[22]  O. Hopperstad,et al.  Static and dynamic crushing of square aluminium extrusions with aluminium foam filler , 2000 .

[23]  O. Hopperstad,et al.  Aluminum foam-filled extrusions subjected to oblique loading: experimental and numerical study , 2004 .

[24]  Zhihua Wang,et al.  Compressive behavior of closed-cell aluminum alloy foams at medium strain rates , 2011 .

[25]  Qing Li,et al.  Multiobjective robust optimization method for drawbead design in sheet metal forming , 2010 .

[26]  Y. Rahmat-Samii,et al.  Particle swarm optimization in electromagnetics , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[27]  Mustafa Güden,et al.  Crushing of aluminum closed cell foams: density and strain rate effects , 2000 .

[28]  Guoxing Lu,et al.  Compressive behaviour of closed-cell aluminium foams at high strain rates , 2010 .

[29]  H. Schreyer,et al.  ANISOTROPIC PLASTICITY MODEL FOR FOAMS AND HONEYCOMBS , 1994 .

[30]  Qian Wang,et al.  Modeling and optimization of foam-filled thin-walled columns for crashworthiness designs , 2010 .

[31]  Kenji Higashi,et al.  Compressive response of a closed-cell aluminum foam at high strain rate , 2006 .

[32]  J. Gassan,et al.  Behavior of aluminum foams under quasi-static and crash loadings , 2001 .

[33]  David P. Thambiratnam,et al.  Dynamic energy absorption characteristics of foam-filled conical tubes under oblique impact loading , 2010 .

[34]  Magnus Langseth,et al.  A numerical model for bird strike of aluminium foam-based sandwich panels , 2006 .

[35]  Qing Li,et al.  A two-stage multi-fidelity optimization procedure for honeycomb-type cellular materials , 2010 .

[36]  N. Fleck,et al.  Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams , 2000 .

[37]  Wei Li,et al.  Crashworthiness design for foam filled thin-wall structures , 2009 .

[38]  Ronald E. Miller A continuum plasticity model for the constitutive and indentation behaviour of foamed metals , 2000 .

[39]  Javad Marzbanrad,et al.  Multi-Objective Optimization of aluminum hollow tubes for vehicle crash energy absorption using a genetic algorithm and neural networks , 2011 .

[40]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  A new optimizer using particle swarm theory , 1995, MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science.

[41]  O. Hopperstad,et al.  Constitutive modeling of aluminum foam including fracture and statistical variation of density , 2003 .

[42]  L. S. Ong,et al.  Dynamic indentation and penetration of aluminium foams , 2008 .

[43]  H. Zarei,et al.  Crashworthiness optimization of empty and filled aluminum crash boxes , 2007 .

[44]  Shaker A. Meguid,et al.  On the crush behaviour of ultralight foam-filled structures , 2004 .