Spatiotemporal segregation in visual search: evidence from parietal lesions.

The mechanisms underlying segmentation and selection of visual stimuli over time were investigated in patients with posterior parietal damage. In a modified visual search task, a preview of old objects preceded search of a new set for a target while the old items remained. In Experiment 1, control participants ignored old and prioritized new items, but patients had severe difficulties finding the target (especially on the contralesional side). In Experiment 2, simplified displays yielded analogous results, ruling out search ease as a crucial factor in poor preview search. In Experiment 3, outlines around distractor groups (to aid segmentation) improved conjunction but not preview search, suggesting a specific deficit in spatiotemporal segmentation. Experiment 4 ruled out spatial disengagement problems as a factor. The data emphasize the role of spatiotemporal segmentation cues in preview search and the parietal lobe in the role of these cues to prioritize search of new stimuli.

[1]  H. Pashler,et al.  Visual selection mediated by location: Selecting successive visual objects , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Lars Nyberg,et al.  Brain Regions Differentially Involved in Remembering What and When: a PET Study , 1997, Neuron.

[3]  R Blake,et al.  Visual form created solely from temporal structure. , 1999, Science.

[4]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Interactions between object and space systems revealed through neuropsychology , 1993 .

[5]  S. Palmer Common region: A new principle of perceptual grouping , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. , 1984 .

[7]  M. Critchley The parietal lobes , 1966 .

[8]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. , 1997, Psychological review.

[9]  M. Posner,et al.  How do the parietal lobes direct covert attention? , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Aging and visual marking: selective deficits for moving stimuli. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[11]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Visual marking of old objects , 1998 .

[12]  J Theeuwes,et al.  Effects of location and form cuing on the allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1989, Acta psychologica.

[13]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Evidence from unilateral visual neglect , 1995 .

[14]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Visual marking of moving objects: a role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J. Driver,et al.  Can Visual Neglect Operate in Object-centred Co-ordinates? An Affirmative Single-case Study , 1991 .

[16]  E. Maguire The cerebral representation of space: insights from functional imaging data , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  An Onset Advantage without a Preview Benefit: Neuropsychological Evidence Separating Onset and Preview Effects in Search , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[19]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Spatial attention in vision , 1986, Psychological research.

[20]  UTE LEONARDS,et al.  The Influence of Temporal Phase Differences on Texture Segmentation , 1996, Vision Research.

[21]  R Blake,et al.  Spatial and temporal coherence in perceptual binding. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  W. D. Ross,et al.  A Neural Theory of Attentive Visual Search : Interactions of Boundary , Surface , Spatial , and Object Representations By : Stephen Grossberg , 2004 .

[23]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Visual Search Performance in the Neglect Syndrome , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.

[26]  J. Duncan,et al.  Systematic analysis of deficits in visual attention. , 1999 .

[27]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction , 1995, Science.

[28]  A Treisman,et al.  Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  A. Cowey,et al.  Left visuo-spatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Visual offsets facilitate saccadic latency: Does predisengagement of visuospatial attention mediate this gap effect? , 1993 .

[31]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Fractionating the preview benefit in search: dual-task decomposition of visual marking by timing and modality. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  S. Yantis,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays , 1972 .

[34]  D. Bub,et al.  Modulation of the Directional Attention Deficit in Visual Neglect by Hemispatial Factors , 1993, Brain and Cognition.

[35]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  M. Goldberg,et al.  The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex , 1998, Nature.

[37]  B. Motter Neural correlates of attentive selection for color or luminance in extrastriate area V4 , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[38]  M. Jeannerod Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. , 1987 .

[39]  Bradley S. Gibson,et al.  Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture Is Contingent on Attentional Set for Displaywide Visual Features , 1998 .

[40]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Separating distractor rejection and target detection in posterior parietal cortex—an event-related fMRI study of visual marking , 2003, NeuroImage.

[42]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The physiological basis of attentional modulation in extrastriate visual areas , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  J Theeuwes,et al.  Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[45]  J. Marshall,et al.  Left neglect for near but not far space in man , 1991, Nature.

[46]  M. Farah,et al.  Parietal lobe mechanisms of spatial attention: Modality-specific or supramodal? , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  R. Walker,et al.  Saccadic eye movement programming in unilateral neglect , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  C. Kennard,et al.  Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients , 1997, Nature.

[49]  R. Bruyer,et al.  Ipsilateral influences on contralateral processing in neglect patients , 1989 .

[50]  J. Duncan,et al.  Competitive brain activity in visual attention , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[51]  Olaf B. Paulson,et al.  Parieto–Occipital Areas Involved in Efficient Filtering in Search: A Time Course Analysis of Visual Marking using Behavioural and Functional Imaging Procedures , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[52]  A. Nobre,et al.  Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  Y Tsal,et al.  Attending to color and shape: The special role of location in selective visual processing , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[54]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[55]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[56]  M. Gado,et al.  Functional Anatomy of the Cerebral Cortex by Computed Tomography , 1979, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[57]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Visual extinction and prior entry: Impaired perception of temporal order with intact motion perception after unilateral parietal damage , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[58]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[59]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Lesioning a connectionist model of visual search: selective effects on distractor grouping. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[60]  Marius Usher,et al.  Visual synchrony affects binding and segmentation in perception , 1998, Nature.

[61]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking: using time in visual selection , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[62]  Melina A. Kunar,et al.  History Matters , 2003, Psychological science.

[63]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[64]  Marvin M. Chun,et al.  Visual marking: selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. , 2002 .

[65]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Visual attention: Insights from brain imaging , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[66]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking inhibits singleton capture , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[67]  Stephen Smith,et al.  Prioritizing new over old: An fMRI study of the preview search task , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[68]  H. Ives XII. Studies in the photometry of lights of different colours , 1912 .

[69]  A. Treisman,et al.  Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions , 1995, Science.

[70]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional priority. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[71]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies edited by Ian H. Robertson and John C. Marshall , 1994 .

[72]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Perceptual and Action Systems in Unilateral Visual Neglect , 1987 .

[73]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[74]  G. Humphreys,et al.  When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down, limited capacity inhibition , 2002 .

[75]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST , 1996, Nature.

[76]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.