Psychological Intimacy Touch as an Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Process in Couples ' Daily Lives : The Mediating Role of

Interpersonal touch seems to promote physical health through its effects on stress-sensitive parameters. However, less is known about the psychological effects of touch. The present study investigates associations between touch and romantic partners’ affective state in daily life. We hypothesized that this association is established by promoting the recipient’s experience of intimacy. Both partners of 102 dating couples completed an electronic diary 4 times a day during 1 week. Multilevel analyses revealed that touch was associated with enhanced affect in the partner. This association was mediated by the partner’s psychological intimacy. Touch was also associated with intimacy and positive affect in the actor. Finally, participants who were touched more often during the diary study week reported better psychological well-being 6 months later. This study provides evidence that intimate partners benefit from touch on a psychological level, conveying a sense of strengthened bonds between them that enhances affect and well-being.

[1]  C. Ryff.  Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. , 1989 .

[2]  Laura K. Guerrero,et al.  The Waxing and Waning of Relational Intimacy: Touch as a Function of Relational Stage, Gender and Touch Avoidance , 1991 .

[3]  Susanne Böcker,et al.  Die Deutsche Form der Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS): Eine kurze Skala zur Messung der Zufriedenheit in einer Partnerschaft. , 1993 .

[4]  J. Gottman,et al.  The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: a longitudinal view of five types of couples. , 1993, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[5]  Laura Stafford,et al.  Maintenance strategies and physical affection as predictors of love, liking, and satisfaction in marriage , 1994 .

[6]  H. Reis,et al.  The role of intimacy and social support in health outcomes: Two processes or one? , 1994 .

[7]  K. Dindia,et al.  The effect of relational stage and intimacy on touch: An extension of Guerrero and Andersen , 1995 .

[8]  H. Reis,et al.  Attachment and intimacy: Component processes. , 1996 .

[9]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. , 1996 .

[10]  Harry T. Reis,et al.  Gender differences in intimacy and related behaviors: Context and process. , 1998 .

[11]  T. Field,et al.  Elder Retired Volunteers Benefit From Giving Massage Therapy to Infants , 1998 .

[12]  Susan S. Hendrick,et al.  The Relationship Assessment Scale , 1998 .

[13]  G. C. Bates.  Affect regulation. , 2000, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[14]  L. Berkman,et al.  From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[15]  R. J. Boik.  Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research: A Correlational Approach , 2001 .

[16]  Matthew J. Hertenstein,et al.  Emotion Regulation Via Maternal Touch. , 2001, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[17]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  Belief and feeling: evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  O. John,et al.  Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: personality processes, individual differences, and life span development. , 2004, Journal of personality.

[19]  L. Roberts,et al.  Deep Intimate Connection: Self and Intimacy in Couple Relationships , 2004 .

[20]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Perceived Partner Responsiveness as an Organizing Construct in the Study of Intimacy and Closeness , 2004 .

[21]  N. Bolger,et al.  Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. , 2005, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[22]  Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al.  The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: a daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. , 2005, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[23]  Jason C. Allaire,et al.  Cardiovascular intraindividual variability in later life: the influence of social connectedness and positive emotions. , 2005, Psychology and aging.

[24]  K. Light,et al.  More frequent partner hugs and higher oxytocin levels are linked to lower blood pressure and heart rate in premenopausal women , 2005, Biological Psychology.

[25]  Phillip R. Shaver,et al.  Patterns of Nonverbal Behavior and Sensivity in the Context of Attachment Relations , 2005 .

[26]  S. Post,et al.  Altruism, happiness, and health: it’s good to be good , 2005, International journal of behavioral medicine.

[27]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The Actor–Partner Interdependence Model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies , 2005 .

[28]  Masumi Iida,et al.  A Procedure for Evaluating Sensitivity to Within-Person Change: Can Mood Measures in Diary Studies Detect Change Reliably? , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[29]  B. Burleson,et al.  Revisiting the Different Cultures Thesis: An Assessment of Sex Differences and Similarities in Supportive Communication. , 2006 .

[30]  Daniel J. Bauer,et al.  Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: new procedures and recommendations. , 2006, Psychological methods.

[31]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads. , 2006, Psychological methods.

[32]  R. Hauser,et al.  An assessment of the construct validity of Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-Being: Method, mode, and measurement effects , 2006 .

[33]  Matthew J. Hertenstein,et al.  The Communicative Functions of Touch in Humans, Nonhuman Primates, and Rats: A Review and Synthesis of the Empirical Research , 2006, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[34]  Sheldon Cohen,et al.  Positive Emotional Style Predicts Resistance to Illness After Experimental Exposure to Rhinovirus or Influenza A Virus , 2006, Psychosomatic medicine.

[35]  M. Burleson,et al.  In the Mood for Love or Vice Versa? Exploring the Relations Among Sexual Activity, Physical Affection, Affect, and Stress in the Daily Lives of Mid-Aged Women , 2007, Archives of sexual behavior.

[36]  Ulrike Ehlert,et al.  Effects of different kinds of couple interaction on cortisol and heart rate responses to stress in women , 2007, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[37]  T. Conner,et al.  Serotonin Transporter Gene Polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and Anxiety Reactivity in Daily Life: A Daily Process Approach to Gene-Environment Interaction , 2007, Psychosomatic medicine.

[38]  Ross A. Thompson,et al.  Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations , 2007 .

[39]  K. Pawlik,et al.  Ambulatory Assessment - Monitoring Behavior in Daily Life Settings A Behavioral-Scientific Challenge for Psychology , 2007 .

[40]  D. Schoebi.  The coregulation of daily affect in marital relationships. , 2008, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[41]  J. Holt-Lunstad,et al.  Influence of a “Warm Touch” Support Enhancement Intervention Among Married Couples on Ambulatory Blood Pressure, Oxytocin, Alpha Amylase, and Cortisol , 2008, Psychosomatic medicine.

[42]  C. Hazan,et al.  Coregulation, Dysregulation, Self-Regulation: An Integrative Analysis and Empirical Agenda for Understanding Adult Attachment, Separation, Loss, and Recovery , 2008, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[43]  M. Clark,et al.  How the head liberates the heart: projection of communal responsiveness guides relationship promotion. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  J. Coan.  TOWARD A NEUROSCIENCE OF ATTACHMENT , 2008 .

[45]  C. Segrin,et al.  The Role of Marital Status and Age on Men’s and Women’s Reactions to Touch from a Relational Partner , 2008 .

[46]  David Holman,et al.  A classification of controlled interpersonal affect regulation strategies. , 2009, Emotion.

[47]  Emotion and Emotion Regulation: Integrating Individual and Social Levels of Analysis , 2009 .

[48]  Shelly L. Gable,et al.  The Paradox of Received Social Support , 2009, Psychological science.

[49]  Klaus R. Scherer,et al.  Emotion definitions (psychological perspectives) , 2009 .

[50]  Timothy B. Smith,et al.  Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[51]  C. Spence,et al.  The science of interpersonal touch: An overview , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[52]  James A. Coan,et al.  Adult attachment and the brain , 2010 .

[53]  N. Bolger,et al.  Analyzing diary and intensive longitudinal data from dyads. , 2012 .

[54]  M. Perrez,et al.  Deeds matter: daily enacted responsiveness and intimacy in couples' daily lives. , 2012, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[55]  P. Shrout,et al.  Close Relationships and Health in Daily Life: A Review and Empirical Data on Intimacy and Somatic Symptoms , 2012, Psychosomatic medicine.