Effects of time-inconsistent preferences on information technology infrastructure investments with growth options

Increasing information technology (IT) infrastructure spending and the capability of such projects to provide a platform for a firm to realize value from IT marks their importance. Effective management of IT infrastructure investments includes identification of embedded growth options in the infrastructure, and exercising them in a timely manner. Extant research has recognized that while managers could use real options thinking in IT investment management, managerial bias could affect the timing of option exercise and their realized value. We analyze the effect of time-inconsistent preferences of present-biased managers on the exercise time of real growth options and the realized value using a discrete time option valuation model. The results show that present-biased managers are more likely to exercise options early when the net payoffs are low, the option payoffs have high volatility, and the risk free discount rate is small. In addition, present biased managers are more likely to exercise a growth option early in its life when the project is performing well. We provide implications for practice and IT governance.

[1]  Bruno Jullien,et al.  Modelling time-inconsistent preferences , 2000 .

[2]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review , 2002 .

[3]  Jasbir Singh Dhaliwal,et al.  Alignment within the corporate IT unit: an analysis of software testing and development , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Valuing information technology infrastructures: a growth options approach , 2007, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[5]  Scott M. Gilpatric.  Slippage in Rebate Programs and Present-Biased Preferences , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[6]  Nancy K. Lankton,et al.  Uncertainty and Industry Structure Effects on Managerial Intuition About Information Technology Real Options , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[8]  Alfred Taudes,et al.  Software Growth Options , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  A market entry timing model for new techniques , 1986 .

[10]  A. Tiwana,et al.  Beyond Valuation: “Options Thinking” in IT Project Management , 2005 .

[11]  Ulrike Malmendier,et al.  Contract Design and Self-Control: Theory and Evidence , 2004 .

[12]  Maria L. Gini,et al.  Flexible decision support in dynamic interorganizational networks ∗ , 2009 .

[13]  Ted O’Donoghue,et al.  Self-awareness and self-control , 2003 .

[14]  Ram L. Kumar,et al.  A Framework for Assessing the Business Value of Information Technology Infrastructures , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Michel Benaroch,et al.  Managing Information Technology Investment Risk: A Real Options Perspective , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  B. Santos.  Justifying investments in new information technologies , 1991 .

[17]  Nalin Kulatilaka,et al.  Options Thinking and Platform Investments: Investing in Opportunity , 1994 .

[18]  L. Trigeorgis.  The Nature of Option Interactions and the Valuation of Investments with Multiple Real Options , 1993, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[19]  Kent D. Miller,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF HEURISTICS AND BIASES AFFECTING REAL OPTION VALUATION , 2004 .

[20]  Alfred Taudes,et al.  Options Analysis of Software Platform Decisions: A Case Study , 2000, MIS Q..

[21]  R. Pollak,et al.  SECOND-BEST NATIONAL SAVING AND GAME-EQUILIBRIUM GROWTH , 1980 .

[22]  Scott M. Gilpatric.  Present-biased preferences, self-awareness and shirking , 2008 .

[23]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Justifying Electronic Banking Network Expansion Using Real Options Analysis , 2000, MIS Q..

[24]  R. Coff,et al.  Real Options Meet Organizational Theory: Coping with Path Dependencies, Agency Costs, and Organizational Form , 2007 .

[25]  Lenos Trigeorgis,et al.  Multi-stage real options: The cases of information technology infrastructure and international bank expansion , 1998 .

[26]  S. Ross,et al.  Option pricing: A simplified approach☆ , 1979 .

[27]  Ram L. Kumar,et al.  A Note on Project Risk and Option Values of Investments in Information Technologies , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Martin Smits,et al.  Using Dempster-Shafer theory and real options theory to assess competing strategies for implementing IT infrastructures: A case study , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[29]  R. Thaler.  Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency , 1981 .

[30]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Information Systems Project Continuation in Escalation Situations: A Real Options Model , 2006, Decis. Sci..

[31]  Ted O’Donoghue.  UC Berkeley Other Recent Work Title Procrastination on Long-Term Projects Permalink , 2002 .

[32]  Ramessh Kumar,et al.  Understanding DSS value: an options perspective , 1999 .

[33]  Sydney Howell,et al.  Laboratory Evidence on How Managers Intuitively Value Real Growth Options , 1997 .

[34]  Ted O’Donoghue,et al.  Doing It Now or Later , 1999 .

[35]  David I. Laibson,et al.  Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting , 1997 .

[36]  Rita Gunther McGrath.  Falling Forward: Real Options Reasoning and Entrepreneurial Failure , 1999 .

[37]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The dynamics of IT boundary objects, information infrastructures, and organisational identities: the introduction of 3D modelling technologies into the architecture, engineering, and construction industry , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Carlos Zozaya-Gorostiza,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty in Information Technology: Acquisition and Development Projects , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Jeffrey L. Coles,et al.  Managerial Incentives and Risk-Taking , 2006 .

[40]  William Margrabe.  The Value of an Option to Exchange One Asset for Another , 1978 .

[41]  Rita Gunther McGrath.  A Real Options Logic for Initiating Technology Positioning Investments , 1997 .

[42]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  The Bounded Rationality Bias in Managerial Valuation of Real Options: Theory and Evidence from IT Projects , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[43]  Robert L. McDonald,et al.  Real Options and Rules of Thumb in Capital Budgeting , 2000 .

[44]  J. Busby,et al.  Real Options In Practice: An Exploratory Survey Of How Finance Officers Deal With Flexibility In Capital Appraisal , 1997 .

[45]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  A Case for Using Real Options Pricing Analysis to Evaluate Information Technology Project Investments , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation , 1992 .

[47]  TaudesAlfred,et al.  Options analysis of software platform decisions , 2000 .

[48]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[49]  Indranil R. Bardhan,et al.  Prioritizing a Portfolio of Information Technology Investment Projects , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Matthew Rabin,et al.  Incentives for Procrastinators , 1999 .

[51]  Yossi Lichtenstein,et al.  Real Options in Information Technology Risk Management: An Empirical Validation of Risk-Option Relationships , 2006, MIS Q..

[52]  Isabelle Brocas,et al.  Rush and Procrastination Under Hyperbolic Discounting and Interdependent Activities , 2001 .

[53]  J. Hull.  Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives , 1989 .

[54]  Ram L. Kumar,et al.  Managing risks in IT projects: an options perspective , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[55]  Mark Jeffery,et al.  On the Valuation of Multistage Information Technology Investments Embedding Nested Real Options , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[56]  S. Kalish,et al.  A MARKET ENTRY TIMING MODEL FOR NEW TECHNOLOGIES * , 2004 .