Shaping the Absence An Architectural Perspective for Interaction Design

Through the course Dense Spaces 2012—i.e. designing small, intelligent spaces such as elevators—carried out together with a group of architecture students at Umea School of Architecture, Umea University, Sweden, we report on, exemplify, and discuss how architectural theories, skills, and attitudes can come to complement and provide new food for thought for other design fields, including interaction design. We present the course, discuss some resulting spaces, and reflect on feedback from the participants. Then, we discuss some outcomes of the course that have broader implications. Unlike a more traditional technology-centered perspective, an architectural approach seems more prone to focus on designing what we term dynamic absence, i.e. design also concerned with what is not there. In a similar vein, an architectural approach also seems to address complexity by not fragmenting design challenges into smaller problems. The more holistic architectural attitude provides the opportunity to treat technology as a design material, along with the other architectural design materials the design situation offers, including structures, light, space, and absence. In this way, the architectural approach seems to shift the attention away from the design of representations and metaphors to instead focus on designing meaningful engagements in these spaces.

[1]  Gordon Pask,et al.  The Architectural Relevance of Cybernetics , 2014 .

[2]  Andrew Light,et al.  Technology and the good life , 2000 .

[3]  Nicholas Negroponte,et al.  Soft Architecture Machines , 1976 .

[4]  Joep Frens,et al.  Designing for rich interaction : integrating form, interaction, and function , 2006 .

[5]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Design Research through Practice , 2011 .

[6]  Daniel Fallman,et al.  A different way of seeing: Albert Borgmann’s philosophy of technology and human–computer interaction , 2010, AI & SOCIETY.

[7]  Jonathan Charley,et al.  Architecture Depends , 2010 .

[8]  H. Lefèbvre,et al.  La production de l'espace , 1992 .

[9]  Benjamin H. Bratton,et al.  FEATUREWhat do we mean by "Program"?: the convergence of architecture and interface design , 2008, INTR.

[10]  Caroline Hummels,et al.  Towards design-driven innovation: designing for points of view using intuition through skills , 2011, DPPI.

[11]  Stephan Wensveen,et al.  Design research: generating knowledge through doing , 2006 .

[12]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Yesterday’s tomorrows: notes on ubiquitous computing’s dominant vision , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[13]  David B. Wilson,et al.  Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry by Albert Borgmann (review) , 1986 .

[14]  Ambra Trotto,et al.  Rights through making : skills for pervasive ethics , 2011 .

[15]  James H. Aylor,et al.  Computer for the 21st Century , 1999, Computer.

[16]  Emile H. L. Aarts,et al.  The New Everyday: Views on Ambient Intelligence , 2003 .