On the Portability of Computer-Generated Presentations: The Effect of Text-Background Color Combinations on Text Legibility

Objective: The aim of our study was to investigate which text-background (TB) color combinations improve legibility and pleasantness of texts either presented on a computer screen or projected on a wider surface. Background: Our work stems from the observation that multimedia presentations, even those by professionals in visual disciplines, are often spoiled by illegibility, which affects readability and the pleasantness of attending to such presentations. Methods: We investigated this problem through three experiments. Experiment 1 assessed the best TB color combinations in slides presented on a laptop. Experiment 2 verified the correlation between legibility and pleasantness for TB presentations. Experiment 3 investigated the legibility of a slide projected on a wide screen in different room lighting conditions. In all experiments participants expressed a rating score for stimulus legibility or pleasantness. Results: Experiments 1 and 3 showed that it is best to have a dark text on a light background for both displayed and projected texts. Experiment 2 showed that pleasantness is tightly correlated with legibility, though legibility depends on contrast between text and background. Conclusions: Our findings are not in complete agreement with the literature concerning legibility of text displayed on a computer screen, and they are in contrast with the common belief that for projection purposes it is best to have a light text on a dark background. Applications: Some practical rules on combining TB colors are given to enhance the legibility of presentations, especially important for the legibility of projected texts.

[1]  Paul van Schaik,et al.  The effects of frame layout and differential background contrast on visual search performance in Web pages , 2001, Interact. Comput..

[2]  S. Pastoor,et al.  Legibility and Subjective Preference for Color Combinations in Text , 1990, Human factors.

[3]  Kong-King Shieh,et al.  Effects of screen type, ambient illumination, and color combination on VDT visual performance and subjective preference , 2000 .

[4]  Stephen Michael Kosslyn,et al.  Graph Design for the Eye and Mind , 2006 .

[5]  A. Gilchrist,et al.  Relative area and relative luminance combine to anchor surface lightness values , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  James Gaston Bloodsworth.  Legibility of Print. , 1993 .

[7]  P. Valdez,et al.  Effects of color on emotions. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  Daniele Zavagno,et al.  DOI:10.1068/p5095 Glowing greys and surface-white: The photo-geometric factors of luminosity perception , 2005 .

[9]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of Reading in Normal and Low Vision , 2006 .

[10]  R. Littell.  SAS System for Mixed Models , 1996 .

[11]  A. Buchner,et al.  Text – background polarity affects performance irrespective of ambient illumination and colour contrast , 2007, Ergonomics.

[12]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Emotional design , 2004, UBIQ.

[13]  E. Peli.  Contrast in complex images. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  Chin-Chiuan Lin.  Effects of contrast ratio and text color on visual performance with TFT-LCD , 2003 .

[15]  A. Gilchrist,et al.  Local and global processes in surface lightness perception , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  G E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. XI. Comparing color contrast and luminance contrast. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  Richard H. Hall,et al.  The impact of web page text-background colour combinations on readability, retention, aesthetics and behavioural intention , 2004, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[18]  M. Appelbaum,et al.  Psychometric methods. , 1989, Annual review of psychology.

[19]  L. Thurstone.  A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[20]  G. Seth.  Psychology of Language , 1968, Nature.

[21]  G E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. IV. Wavelength effects in normal and low vision. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  Yili Liu,et al.  Engineering aesthetics and aesthetic ergonomics: Theoretical foundations and a dual-process research methodology , 2003, Ergonomics.