MIT Open Access Articles Neural Coding of Interaural Time Differences with Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Effects of Congenital Deafness

Human bilateral cochlear implant users do poorly on tasks involving interaural time differences (ITD), a cue that provides important benefits to the normal hearing, especially in challenging acoustic environments, yet the precision of neural ITD coding in acutely deafened, bilaterally implanted cats is essentially normal (Smith and Delgutte, 2007a). One explanation for this discrepancy is that the extended periods of binaural deprivation typically experienced by cochlear implant users degrades neural ITD sensitivity, by either impeding normal maturation of the neural circuitry or altering it later in life. To test this hypothesis, we recorded from single units in inferior colliculus of two groups of bilaterally implanted, anesthetized cats that contrast maximally in binaural experience: acutely deafened cats, which had normal binaural hearing until experimentation, and congenitally deaf white cats, which received no auditory inputs until the experiment. Rate responses of only half as many neurons showed significant ITD sensitivity to low-rate pulse trains in congenitally deaf cats compared with acutely deafened cats. For neurons that were ITD sensitive, ITD tuning was broader and best ITDs were more variable in congenitally deaf cats, leading to poorer ITD coding within the naturally occurring range. A signal detection model constrained by the observed physiology supports the idea that the degraded neural ITD coding resulting from deprivation of binaural experience contributes to poor ITD discrimination by human implantees.

[1]  D. Polley,et al.  Monaural Deprivation Disrupts Development of Binaural Selectivity in Auditory Midbrain and Cortex , 2010, Neuron.

[2]  A. Engel,et al.  Cortical representation of interaural time difference in congenital deafness. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Effect of age at onset of deafness on binaural sensitivity in electric hearing in humans. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Becky B. Poon,et al.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Anne E. Takesian,et al.  Developmental hearing loss disrupts synaptic inhibition: implications for auditory processing. , 2009, Future neurology.

[6]  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Accurate Sound Localization in Reverberant Environments Is Mediated by Robust Encoding of Spatial Cues in the Auditory Midbrain , 2009, Neuron.

[7]  B. Papsin,et al.  Abnormal Timing Delays in Auditory Brainstem Responses Evoked by Bilateral Cochlear Implant Use in Children , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[8]  B. Seeber,et al.  Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Robert F Labadie,et al.  Interaural Time and Level Difference Thresholds for Acoustically Presented Signals in Post-Lingually Deafened Adults Fitted with Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using CIS+ Processing , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[10]  Robert K Shepherd,et al.  Deafness alters auditory nerve fibre responses to cochlear implant stimulation , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  Zachary M. Smith,et al.  Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences in the Inferior Colliculus with Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  B. Papsin,et al.  Binaural processing in children using bilateral cochlear implants , 2007, Neuroreport.

[13]  Piotr Majdak,et al.  Lateralization discrimination of interaural time delays in four-pulse sequences in electric and acoustic hearing. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Zachary M. Smith,et al.  Using Evoked Potentials to Match Interaural Electrode Pairs with Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[15]  Philip X Joris,et al.  Binaural and cochlear disparities , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  J. Niparko,et al.  Restoration of Auditory Nerve Synapses in Cats by Cochlear Implants , 2005, Science.

[17]  Armin H. Seidl,et al.  Development of sound localization mechanisms in the mongolian gerbil is shaped by early acoustic experience. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Vasant K. Dasika,et al.  Effects of inhibitory feedback in a network model of avian brain stem. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Bernhard Laback,et al.  Sensitivity to Interaural Level and Envelope Time Differences of Two Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners Using Clinical Sound Processors , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[20]  B. Delgutte,et al.  A Physiologically Based Model of Interaural Time Difference Discrimination , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  R. V. van Hoesel Exploring the Benefits of Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2004, Audiology and Neurotology.

[22]  D. Ryugo,et al.  Separate forms of pathology in the cochlea of congenitally deaf white cats , 2003, Hearing Research.

[23]  D. Ryugo,et al.  Effects of congenital deafness in the cochlear nuclei of Shaker-2 mice: An ultrastructural analysis of synapse morphology in the endbulbs of Held , 2003, Journal of neurocytology.

[24]  R. Tyler,et al.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  B. Grothe,et al.  Precise inhibition is essential for microsecond interaural time difference coding , 2002, Nature.

[26]  B. Walmsley,et al.  Synaptic transmission in the auditory brainstem of normal and congenitally deaf mice , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  Benedikt Grothe,et al.  Experience-dependent refinement of inhibitory inputs to auditory coincidence-detector neurons , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  D. McAlpine,et al.  A neural code for low-frequency sound localization in mammals , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Raggio,et al.  Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. III. Activation patterns in short- and long-term deafness. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  R. Shepherd,et al.  Response of inferior colliculus neurons to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in neonatally deafened cats. , 1999, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[31]  D T Lawson,et al.  Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor. , 1998, The American journal of otology.

[32]  J E Mossop,et al.  Lateralization of large interaural delays. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  J. Niparko,et al.  Single unit recordings in the auditory nerve of congenitally deaf white cats: Morphological correlates in the cochlea and cochlear nucleus , 1998, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  Rainer Hartmann,et al.  A model for prelingual deafness, the congenitally deaf white cat – population statistics and degenerative changes , 1998, Hearing Research.

[35]  J. Niparko,et al.  Ultrastructural analysis of primary endings in deaf white cats: Morphologic alterations in endbulbs of held , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[36]  Robert K Shepherd,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status , 1997, Hearing Research.

[37]  N. Kiang,et al.  Generators of the brainstem auditory evoked potential in cat III: identified cell populations , 1996, Hearing Research.

[38]  T. Yin,et al.  Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. I. Sensitivity to interaural time differences. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Profound hearing loss in the cat following the single co-administration of kanamycin and ethacrynic acid , 1993, Hearing Research.

[40]  R. Snyder,et al.  Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I: Expansion of central representation , 1990, Hearing Research.

[41]  W M Hartmann,et al.  On the minimum audible angle--a decision theory approach. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Donald Robertson,et al.  Plasticity of frequency organization in auditory cortex of guinea pigs with partial unilateral deafness , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[43]  T. Yin,et al.  Effects of interaural time delays of noise stimuli on low-frequency cells in the cat's inferior colliculus. I. Responses to wideband noise. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  Robert A. Levine,et al.  Binaural interaction in brainstem potentials of human subjects , 1981, Annals of neurology.

[45]  R A Dobie,et al.  Binaural interaction in human auditory evoked potentials. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[46]  D. K. Morest,et al.  Transneuronal changes of synaptic endings and nuclear chromatin in the trapezoid body following cochlear ablations in cats , 1975 .

[47]  J. M. Harrison,et al.  Transneuronal cell atrophy in the congenitally deaf white cat , 1973, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[48]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  R. V. van Hoesel,et al.  Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[50]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .