Hierarchical main path analysis to identify decompositional multi-knowledge trajectories

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose a quantitative method for identifying multiple and hierarchical knowledge trajectories within a specific technological domain (TD). Design/methodology/approach The proposed method as a patent-based data-driven approach is basically based on patent classification systems and patent citation information. Specifically, the method first analyzes hierarchical structure under a specific TD based on patent co-classification and hierarchical relationships between patent classifications. Then, main paths for each sub-TD and overall-TD are generated by knowledge persistence-based main path approach. The all generated main paths at different level are integrated into the hierarchical main paths. Findings This paper conducted an empirical analysis by using Genome sequencing technology. The results show that the proposed method automatically identifies three sub-TDs, which are major functionalities in the TD, and generates the hierarchical main paths. The generated main paths show knowledge flows across different sub-TDs and the changing trends in dominant sub-TD over time. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the proposed method is the first attempt to automatically generate multiple hierarchical main paths using patent data. The generated main paths objectively show not only knowledge trajectories for each sub-TD but also interactive knowledge flows among sub-TDs. Therefore, the method is definitely helpful to reduce manual work for TD decomposition and useful to understand major trajectories for TD.

[1]  B. Chain,et al.  The sequence of sequencers: The history of sequencing DNA , 2016, Genomics.

[2]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Recombinant Search and Breakthrough Idea Generation: An Analysis of High Impact Papers in the Social Sciences , 2011 .

[3]  Norman P. Hummon,et al.  Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory☆ , 1989 .

[4]  Scott Shane,et al.  Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Mapping Technological Trajectories as Patent citation Networks: a Study on the History of Fuel Cell Research , 2007, Adv. Complex Syst..

[6]  F. Sanger,et al.  DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  John Metcalfe,et al.  Mapping evolutionary trajectories: Applications to the growth and transformation of medical knowledge , 2007 .

[8]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[9]  Chih-Hung Hsieh,et al.  Development trajectory and research themes of foresight , 2016 .

[10]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis , 2006 .

[11]  M. Weitzman,et al.  Recombinant Growth , 2009 .

[12]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Quantitative Identification of Technological Discontinuities , 2018, IEEE Access.

[13]  Nagarajan Raghavan,et al.  Quantitative identification of technological paradigm changes using knowledge persistence , 2019, PloS one.

[14]  Önder Nomaler,et al.  Measuring knowledge persistence: a genetic approach to patent citation networks , 2014 .

[15]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  A hybrid keyword and patent class methodology for selecting relevant sets of patents for a technological field , 2013, Scientometrics.

[16]  M. Akeson,et al.  New DNA sequencing methods. , 2001, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[17]  Changbae Mun,et al.  Structural decomposition of technological domain using patent co-classification and classification hierarchy , 2019, Scientometrics.

[18]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Technology structural implications from the extension of a patent search method , 2014, Scientometrics.

[19]  Daniele Rotolo,et al.  Determinants of Patent Citations in Biotechnology: An Analysis of Patent Influence Across the Industrial and Organizational Boundaries , 2014, ArXiv.

[20]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Tracing Technological Development Trajectories: A Genetic Knowledge Persistence-Based Main Path Approach , 2016, PloS one.

[22]  Ichiro Sakata,et al.  Knowledge combination modeling: The measurement of knowledge similarity between different technological domains , 2015 .

[23]  Roberto Fontana,et al.  Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks. An application to data communication standards , 2009 .

[24]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Identification of promising patents for technology transfers using TRIZ evolution trends , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[25]  Gualtiero Fantoni,et al.  The light and shade of knowledge recombination: Insights from a general-purpose technology , 2017 .

[26]  Anne M. Keuneke,et al.  Device representation-the significance of functional knowledge , 1991, IEEE Expert.

[27]  John S. Liu,et al.  A novel approach to identify the major research themes and development trajectory: The case of patenting research , 2016 .

[28]  Mahmoud Ibrahim Fallatah,et al.  Does value matter? An examination of the impact of knowledge value on firm performance and the moderating role of knowledge breadth , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..