Life cycle assessment of cotton T-shirts in China

PurposeNowadays, environmental sustainability of textile has gained much attention from government and suppliers due to the resource consumption and pollutant emissions. Besides, different consumer behaviors can result in quite different environmental consequences mainly in terms of water and energy consumption. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically evaluate the environmental impacts of textiles from a life cycle perspective to improve the sustainability of textiles especially for China, the biggest producer, exporter, and consumer in the world.MethodsThis study is conducted according to the International Organizations for Standardization’s (ISO) 14040 standard series. The declared unit is a piece of 100 % cotton short-sleeved T-shirt. The production data mainly come from field investigations of representative mills in China. The use-phase data are mainly from 924 questionnaires of Chinese residents. The secondary data from databases, literatures, and authoritative statistical data are supplemented in case primary data are not available. The potential environmental impacts are evaluated using the CML2001 and USEtox methodologies built into the GaBi version 6.0 software. We determine hotspots throughout the life cycle of the cotton textile considering the impact categories of abiotic depletion, acidification potential, global warming potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, eutrophication potential, water use, and toxicity.Results and discussionThe results of the study show that cotton cultivation, dyeing, making-up, and use-phases are the main contributors to the environmental impacts. In particular, fertilizer, pesticide, and water use in cotton cultivation, coal, dyes, and auxiliaries use in dyeing, electricity use in making-up, detergent and water use in washing, and electricity use in spinning are the hotspots based on the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) results. The use-phase scenario analysis shows that compared with machine washing, electric drying, and ironing share the majority of electricity consumption. Compared with Americans, Chinese washing habits are much more environmental-friendly and bring much lower environmental impacts in the use stage.ConclusionsEnergy consumption, chemical use, and water use are main contributors to most impact categories, which help us to find hotspots and potential improvements of sustainability.

[1]  Genia Kostka,et al.  Barriers to increasing energy efficiency: evidence from small-and medium-sized enterprises in China , 2013 .

[2]  Yan Li,et al.  Partial rootzone irrigation increases water use efficiency, maintains yield and enhances economic profit of cotton in arid area , 2010 .

[3]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Environmental assessment of coloured fabrics and opportunities for value creation: spin-dyeing versus conventional dyeing of modal fabrics , 2014 .

[4]  Bi Jun.  Order scheduling optimization for printing and dyeing enterprises aiming water conservation , 2010 .

[5]  Stig Irving Olsen,et al.  Environmental benefits from reusing clothes , 2010 .

[6]  Ali Hasanbeigi,et al.  A Review of Energy Use and Energy Efficiency Technologies for the Textile Industry , 2012 .

[7]  Lei Huang,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of continuous pad-dyeing technology for cotton fabrics , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[8]  Paul S Phillips,et al.  Life cycle assessment for reuse/recycling of donated waste textiles compared to use of virgin material: An UK energy saving perspective , 2006 .

[9]  Jianlong Dai,et al.  Intensive cotton farming technologies in China: Achievements, challenges and countermeasures ☆ , 2014 .

[10]  Marie de Saxcé,et al.  LCA of bed sheets – some relevant parameters for lifetime assessment , 2012 .

[11]  Ting Chi,et al.  Building a sustainable supply chain: an analysis of corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices in the Chinese textile and apparel industry , 2011 .

[12]  Rainer Stamminger,et al.  Electricity and water consumption for laundry washing by washing machine worldwide , 2010 .

[13]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  EDIPTEX – Environmental assessment of textiles , 2007 .

[14]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[15]  Wei Xun,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment of Cotton Planting and Suggestions for its Sustainable Development , 2011 .

[16]  O. Jolliet,et al.  A spatially explicit life cycle inventory of the global textile chain , 2009 .

[17]  中華人民共和国国家統計局.  China statistical yearbook , 1988 .

[18]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[19]  Celia Steward Ponder.  Life cycle inventory analysis of medical textiles and their role in prevention of nosocomial infections , 2009 .

[20]  N. Kiran-Ciliz,et al.  Reduction in resource consumption by process modifications in cotton wet processes , 2003 .

[21]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Prospective Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Nanosilver T-Shirts , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  LCA benchmarking study on textiles made of cotton, polyester, nylon, acryl, or elastane , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.