Predicting two-year quality of life after breast cancer surgery using artificial neural network and linear regression models

The purpose of this study was to validate the use of artificial neural network (ANN) models for predicting quality of life (QOL) after breast cancer surgery and to compare the predictive capability of ANNs with that of linear regression (LR) models. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire and its supplementary breast cancer measure were completed by 402 breast cancer patients at baseline and at 2 years postoperatively. The accuracy of the system models were evaluated in terms of mean square error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). A global sensitivity analysis was also performed to assess the relative significance of input parameters in the system model and to rank the variables in order of importance. Compared to the LR model, the ANN model generally had smaller MSE and MAPE values in both the training and testing datasets. Most ANN models had MAPE values ranging from 4.70 to 19.96 %, and most had high prediction accuracy. The ANN model also outperformed the LR model in terms of prediction accuracy. According to global sensitivity analysis, pre-operative functional status was the best predictor of QOL after surgery. Compared with the conventional LR model, the ANN model in the study was more accurate for predicting patient-reported QOL and had higher overall performance indices. Further refinements are expected to obtain sufficient performance improvements for its routine use in clinical practice as an adjunctive decision-making tool.

[1]  J. Nazuno Haykin, Simon. Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation, Prentice Hall, Inc. Segunda Edición, 1999 , 2000 .

[2]  D. Jeffe,et al.  The association between chronic disease burden and quality of life among breast cancer survivors in Missouri , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[3]  J V Tu,et al.  Advantages and disadvantages of using artificial neural networks versus logistic regression for predicting medical outcomes. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  Yi Han,et al.  Overview of Artificial Neural Networks , 2009, Artificial Neural Networks.

[5]  Andrew Hunter,et al.  Application of neural networks and sensitivity analysis to improved prediction of trauma survival , 2000, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[6]  C. Floyd,et al.  Prediction of breast cancer malignancy using an artificial neural network , 1994, Cancer.

[7]  Gill Lawrence,et al.  Evidence against the proposition that “UK cancer survival statistics are misleading”: simulation study with National Cancer Registry data , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[9]  Ross Camidge,et al.  The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer , 2002 .

[10]  Oguzhan Alagoz,et al.  Informatics in radiology: comparison of logistic regression and artificial neural network models in breast cancer risk estimation. , 2010, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  Jacqueline Kerr,et al.  Quality of Life Following Breast‐Conserving Therapy or Mastectomy: Results of a 5‐Year Prospective Study , 2004, The breast journal.

[12]  J. Bergh,et al.  Age-specific trends of survival in metastatic breast cancer: 26 years longitudinal data from a population-based cancer registry in Stockholm, Sweden , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[13]  J. Coebergh,et al.  Unfavourable pattern of metastases in M0 breast cancer patients during 1978-2008: a population-based analysis of the Munich Cancer Registry , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[14]  Andrew Bottomley,et al.  EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual , 1995 .

[15]  Shigeru Katagiri,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamical Systems: Feedforward Neural Network Perspectives , 2001 .

[16]  G. Ball,et al.  A validated gene expression profile for detecting clinical outcome in breast cancer using artificial neural networks , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[17]  M. Nissen,et al.  Quality of life after breast carcinoma surgery , 2001, Cancer.

[18]  Graham A. Colditz,et al.  Defining breast cancer prognosis based on molecular phenotypes: results from a large cohort study , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[19]  J. Zujewski,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: trends in treatment over time in the US , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[20]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[21]  R. Orr,et al.  Use of an artificial neural network to quantitate risk of malignancy for abnormal mammograms. , 2001, Surgery.

[22]  C. Johansen,et al.  Self-efficacy, adjustment style and well-being in breast cancer patients: a longitudinal study , 2010, Quality of Life Research.

[23]  M. Hou,et al.  Two-year quality of life after breast cancer surgery: a comparison of three surgical procedures. , 2011, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[24]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[25]  Roberto Tagliaferri,et al.  Artificial neural network analysis of circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer patients , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[26]  Chiun-Sheng Huang,et al.  Quality of life of breast cancer patients in Taiwan: Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ‐C30 and EORTC QLQ‐BR23 , 2003, Psycho-oncology.