Student engagement in the educational interface: understanding the mechanisms of student success

ABSTRACT Student success and retention continue to be of concern for higher education institutions. Wider participation, combined with lower completion rates for non-traditional students, highlights the need for new ways of understanding the student experience to ground policy and practice. This article provides this insight by drawing together a number of key constructs to refine a recent framework of student engagement. We argue that the transition metaphor, focusing on the first year, is limited because it depicts differences between students and institutions as both transient and temporal. Instead, we use a cultural lens to introduce the educational interface as a metaphor for the individual psychosocial space within which institutional and student factors combine and student engagement in learning occurs. Incorporating the interface into the existing framework of student engagement makes three contributions to our understanding of the student experience. First, the educational interface is a tangible way of representing the complex interactions between students and institutions, and how those interactions influence engagement. Second, the refined framework highlights four specific psychosocial constructs: self-efficacy, emotions, belonging and well-being, which, we contend, are critical mechanisms for mediating the interactions between student and institutional characteristics and student engagement and success. Finally, the refined framework helps to explain why some students with demographic characteristics associated with lower completion rates are retained and do go on to successfully complete their studies, while similar others do not. These three contributions, the interface, the key constructs within it being mediating mechanisms and their explanatory utility, provide focus for the design and implementation of curricula and co-curricular initiatives aimed at enhancing student success and retention, and importantly to evaluate the impact of these interventions.

[1]  P. Love,et al.  A Cultural Perspective on Student Departure , 2020 .

[2]  N. Mansfield,et al.  Subjectivity , 2020, Kierkegaard.

[3]  K. Nelson,et al.  Student interest as a key driver of engagement for first year students. , 2017 .

[4]  K. Nelson,et al.  Friendship supported learning – the role of friendships in first-year students’ university experiences , 2017 .

[5]  C. Bryson.  Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education , 2016 .

[6]  Daniel Edwards,et al.  Completing university in a growing sector: Is equity an issue? , 2015 .

[7]  L. Leach,et al.  Linking academic emotions and student engagement: mature-aged distance students’ transition to university , 2015 .

[8]  Chi Baik,et al.  The First Year Experience in Australian Universities: Findings from two decades, 1994-2014 , 2015 .

[9]  M. Devlin,et al.  ‘Uni has a different language … to the real world’: demystifying academic culture and discourse for students from low socioeconomic backgrounds , 2014 .

[10]  T. Gale,et al.  Navigating change: a typology of student transition in higher education , 2014 .

[11]  David Kemp,et al.  Review of the demand driven funding system , 2014 .

[12]  C. Bryson,et al.  Clarifying the concept of student engagement , 2014 .

[13]  C. Bryson,et al.  Understanding and Developing Student Engagement , 2014 .

[14]  M. Devlin.  Bridging socio-cultural incongruity: conceptualising the success of students from low socio-economic status backgrounds in Australian higher education , 2013 .

[15]  E. Kahu.  Framing student engagement in higher education , 2013 .

[16]  S. Kift,et al.  A transition pedagogy for student engagement and first-year learning, success and retention , 2012 .

[17]  Reneé Smit.  Towards a clearer understanding of student disadvantage in higher education: problematising deficit thinking , 2012 .

[18]  A. Bakker,et al.  Positive Emotions , 2011 .

[19]  T. Gale.  Expansion and equity in Australian higher education: three propositions for new relations , 2011 .

[20]  Linda G. Wyatt.  Nontraditional Student Engagement: Increasing Adult Student Success and Retention , 2011 .

[21]  H. Stallman.  Psychological distress in university students: A comparison with general population data , 2010 .

[22]  Jocey Quinn.  Rethinking ‘failed transitions’ to higher education , 2009 .

[23]  D. Bradley,et al.  Review of Australian Higher Education: final report , 2008 .

[24]  Kerri-Lee Krause,et al.  Students’ engagement in first‐year university , 2008 .

[25]  R. Barnett.  A Will to Learn: Being a Student in an Age of Uncertainty , 2007 .

[26]  Martin Nakata,et al.  Disciplining the Savages: Savaging the Disciplines , 2007 .

[27]  Mary Lea,et al.  The "Academic Literacies" Model: Theory and Applications , 2006 .

[28]  Elizabeth A. Linnenbrink.  Emotion Research in Education: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives on the Integration of Affect, Motivation, and Cognition , 2006 .

[29]  R. Flett,et al.  Influential Factors Moderating Academic Enjoyment/motivation and Psychological Well-Being for Maori University Students at Massey University , 2005 .

[30]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[31]  Louise Archer,et al.  Challenging Cultures? Student Conceptions of 'Belonging' and 'Isolation' at a Post-1992 University , 2003 .

[32]  Martin Nakata,et al.  Indigenous Knowledge and the Cultural Interface: underlying issues at the intersection of knowledge and information systems , 2002 .

[33]  L. Thomas.  Student retention in higher education: the role of institutional habitus , 2002, Bourdieu and Education.

[34]  Digby Warren,et al.  Curriculum Design in a Context of Widening Participation in Higher Education , 2002 .

[35]  Sarah J. Mann,et al.  Alternative Perspectives on the Student Experience: Alienation and engagement , 2001 .

[36]  G. Dei.  Rethinking the role of Indigenous knowledges in the academy , 2000 .

[37]  A. Astin.  Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. , 1999 .

[38]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  C. Valentine.  Deficit Difference, and Bicultural Models of Afro-American Behavior , 1971 .

[40]  H. Coates.  Students' early departure intentions and the mitigating role of support , 2014 .

[41]  M. Healey,et al.  Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education , 2014 .

[42]  Carol A. Mullen,et al.  Self-Efficacy as an Engaged Learner , 2012 .

[43]  Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia,et al.  Academic Emotions and Student Engagement , 2012 .

[44]  Larissa Behrendt,et al.  Review of Higher Education Access and Outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People: Final Report , 2012 .

[45]  M. Segers,et al.  Factors affecting students' self-efficacy in higher education , 2011 .

[46]  L. Leach,et al.  Improving Student Engagement in Post-compulsory Education: A Synthesis of Research Literature , 2010 .

[47]  Ian Miles,et al.  Innovation and Skills , 2010 .

[48]  Keithia Wilson,et al.  Success in first year: the impact of institutional, programmatic and personal interventions on an effective and sustainable first-year student experience , 2009 .

[49]  Jennifer Ma,et al.  Education Pays: The Benefits of Higher Education for Individuals and Society , 2007 .

[50]  Martin Trow,et al.  Reflections on the Transition from Elite to Mass to Universal Access: Forms and Phases of Higher Education in Modern Societies since WWII , 2007 .

[51]  P. Bourdieu.  Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[52]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1977 .