Contribution of radar interferometry to a two-step inversion of the kinematic process of the 1992 Landers earthquake

$*We study the rupture process of the 1992 Landers earthquake. To limit the trade-off between slip amplitude and rupture time that affects solutions using only seismological data, we adopt a two-step approach. We first constrain the slip distribution and its uncertainty by independent geodetic data to recover in the second step the temporal details of the rupture propagation. The first step consists of an inversion of interferometric data and Global Positioning System measurements, both independently and together, to constrain slip distribution on a three-segment fault model along both strike and dip direction. We use a genetic algorithm to test the uniqueness of the solution and a least squares formulation to find the model which best fits the data. We conclude from the results of these geodetic inversions that interferometric data are rich enough to access the slip distribution in the case of the Landers earthquake. Since the surface deformations are more sensitive to shallow slip in our configuration, the slip amplitude is better resolved near the surface than at depth. The resulting slip distribution is in agreement with geological observations at the surface and confirms the heterogeneous nature of the Landers earthquake. Most of the slip occurs at shallow depths, on the Homestead Valley fault (second segment), with a maximum value of around 7 m. Another high slip zone is observed on the Johnson Valley fault (first segment) at 8 km depth. In the second step, we invert strong motion data with the a priori final slip amplitude and its uncertainty deduced from geodetic data to constrain the time history of the rupture process. This second step emphasizes a strong variation of the temporal development of the earthquake. Fast rupture front velocities appear within high slip zones, and the rupture slows when it encounters a resistance along the fault. On average, the rupture front propagates with velocities close to the S wave velocity and terminates about 20 s after initiation. The large variations in both slip amplitude and rupture velocity suggest that the rupture process is better described by successively breaking asperities than by a pulse propagating with constant velocity.

[1]  J. C. Savage.  Displacement field for an edge dislocation in a layered half‐space , 1998 .

[2]  D. Wald,et al.  Spatial and temporal distribution of slip for the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  Gregory C. Beroza,et al.  Slip distribution of the 1992 Landers earthquake and its implications for earthquake source mechanics , 1994 .

[4]  B. Kennett,et al.  Seismic waves in a stratified half space. , 1979 .

[5]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Postseismic deformation following the Landers earthquake, California, 28 June 1992 , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[6]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  Initial investigation of the Landers, California, Earthquake of 28 June 1992 using TERRAscope , 1992 .

[7]  K. Feigl,et al.  Radar interferometry and its application to changes in the Earth's surface , 1998 .

[8]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Seismological aspects of the Guatemala Earthquake of February 4, 1976 , 1978 .

[9]  K. Feigl,et al.  Radar interferometric mapping of deformation in the year after the Landers earthquake , 1994, Nature.

[10]  K. Feigl,et al.  The displacement field of the Landers earthquake mapped by radar interferometry , 1993, Nature.

[11]  H. Quin.  Dynamic stress drop and rupture dynamics of the October 15, 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake , 1990 .

[12]  Paul Rosen,et al.  Postseismic Rebound in Fault Step-Overs Caused by Pore Fluid Flow , 1996, Science.

[13]  F. Cotton,et al.  Application of seismogram synthesis to the study of earthquake source from strong motion records , 1994 .

[14]  Kim B. Olsen,et al.  Three-Dimensional Dynamic Simulation of the 1992 Landers Earthquake , 1997 .

[15]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  Inversion of strong ground motion and teleseismic waveform data for the fault rupture history of the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake , 1983 .

[16]  T. Heaton.  Evidence for and implications of self-healing pulses of slip in earthquake rupture , 1990 .

[17]  Raul Madariaga,et al.  Dynamic faulting under rate-dependent friction , 1994 .

[18]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  Analysis of coseismic surface displacement gradients using radar interferometryc New insights into the Landers earthquake , 1994 .

[19]  Kerry E Sieh,et al.  Geologic investigations of a “slip gap” in the surficial ruptures of the 1992 Landers earthquake, southern California , 1995 .

[20]  Pengcheng Liu,et al.  The 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake: Investigation of rupture velocity, risetime, and high‐frequency radiation , 1996 .

[21]  Michel Campillo,et al.  Stress field associated with the rupture of the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake and its implications concerning the fault strength at the onset of the earthquake , 1998 .

[22]  S. Day.  Three-dimensional simulation of spontaneous rupture: The effect of nonuniform prestress , 1982 .

[23]  Didier Massonnet,et al.  Detection of postseismic fault-zone collapse following the Landers earthquake , 1996, Nature.

[24]  A rupture model for the 28 June 1992 Landers, California, Earthquake , 1993 .

[25]  Reconstruction of dynamic rupture process of an earthquake with constraints of kinematic parameters , 1992 .

[26]  Carlson,et al.  Mechanical model of an earthquake fault. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[27]  T. Mikumo,et al.  Dynamic rupture analysis: Inversion for the source process of the 1990 Izu‐Oshima, Japan, earthquake (M = 6.5) , 1993 .

[28]  Breaking of a single asperity: Rupture process and seismic radiation , 1983 .

[29]  Michel Campillo,et al.  Frequency domain inversion of strong motions: Application to the 1992 Landers earthquake , 1995 .

[30]  M. Takeo,et al.  The dynamic rupture process of the 1993 Kushiro-oki earthquake , 1996 .

[31]  Jerome A. Treiman,et al.  Near-Field Investigations of the Landers Earthquake Sequence, April to July 1992 , 1993, Science.

[32]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Finding sets of acceptable solutions with a genetic algorithm with application to surface wave group dispersion in Europe , 1994 .

[33]  A comparison of two methods for earthquake source inversion using strong motion seismograms , 1994 .

[34]  Kazuro Hirahara,et al.  Dynamical fault rupture processes in heterogeneous media , 1987 .

[35]  Allen H. Olson,et al.  Finite faults and inverse theory with applications to the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake , 1982 .

[36]  Michel Bouchon,et al.  The state of stress on some faults of the San Andreas system as inferred from near-field strong motion data , 1997 .

[37]  Kurt L. Feigl,et al.  Estimation of an earthquake focal mechanism from a satellite radar interferogram: Application to the December 4, 1992 Landers aftershock , 1995 .

[38]  Satoshi Fujiwara,et al.  Synthetic aperture radar interferogram of the 1995 Kobe Earthquake and its geodetic inversion , 1997 .

[39]  Ralph J. Archuleta,et al.  A faulting model for the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake , 1984 .

[40]  Michael B. Heflin,et al.  Absolute far-field displacements from the 28 June 1992 Landers earthquake sequence , 1993, Nature.

[41]  M. Bouchon.  A simple method to calculate Green's functions for elastic layered media , 1981 .

[42]  Didier Massonnet,et al.  A comparison between short term (Co‐Seismic) and long term (one year) slip for the Landers Earthquake: Measurements from strong motion and SAR interferometry , 1997 .

[43]  Kerry E Sieh,et al.  The transfer of slip between two en echelon strike‐slip faults: A case study from the 1992 Landers earthquake, southern California , 1995 .

[44]  Y. Bock,et al.  Co-seismic displacements of the 1992 landers earthquake sequence , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.