Quantifying agitation in sedated ICU patients using digital imaging

Agitation is a significant problem in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), affecting 71% of sedated adult patients during 58% of ICU patient-days. Subjective scale based assessment-methods focused primarily on assessing excessive patient motion are currently used to assess the level of patient agitation, but are limited in their accuracy and resolution. This research quantifies this approach by developing an objective agitation measurement from patient motion that is sensed using digital video image processing. A fuzzy inference system (FIS) is developed to classify levels of motion that correlate with observed patient agitation, while accounting for motion due to medical staff working on the patient. Clinical tests for five ICU patients have been performed to verify the validity of this approach in comparison to agitation graded by nursing staff using the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS). All trials were performed in the Christchurch Hospital Department of Intensive Care, with ethics approval from the Canterbury Ethics Committee. Results show good correlation with medical staff assessment with no false positive results during calm periods. Clinically, this initial agitation measurement method promises the ability to consistently and objectively quantify patient agitation to enable better management of sedation and agitation through optimised drug delivery leading to reduced length of stay and improved outcome.

[1]  J. Vender,et al.  Anxiety, delirium, and pain in the intensive care unit. , 2001, Critical care clinics.

[2]  Michio Sugeno,et al.  Fuzzy systems theory and its applications , 1991 .

[3]  G C Wake,et al.  Rethinking sedation and agitation management in critical illness. , 2003, Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine.

[4]  Philip D Lumb,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult. , 2002, Critical care medicine.

[5]  A. Kandel Fuzzy Mathematical Techniques With Applications , 1986 .

[6]  J. Foster,et al.  A national survey of critical care nurses' practices related to administration of neuromuscular blocking agents. , 2001, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[7]  Edward Abraham,et al.  Management of the agitated intensive care unit patient. , 2002, Critical care medicine.

[8]  Genís Carrasco,et al.  Instruments for monitoring intensive care unit sedation , 2000, Critical care.

[9]  Seok Won Lee,et al.  Peak detection of ECG signal using wavelet transform and radial basis functions , 1999, SICE '99. Proceedings of the 38th SICE Annual Conference. International Session Papers (IEEE Cat. No.99TH8456).

[10]  G. Fraser,et al.  Prospective evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients. , 1999, Critical care medicine.

[11]  D. Chittock,et al.  Measuring quality of sedation in adult mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. the Vancouver Interaction and Calmness Scale. Sedation Focus Group. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  C. Sessler,et al.  The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. , 2002, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[13]  J. Kress,et al.  Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  C. Gross,et al.  Sedating critically ill patients: factors affecting nurses' delivery of sedative therapy. , 2001, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.