Comparative Evaluation of Classical Methods, Optimized Gabor Filters and LBP for Texture Feature Selection and Classification

This paper builds upon a previous texture feature selection and classification methodology by extending it with two state-of-the-art families of texture feature extraction methods, namely Manjunath & Ma's Gabor wavelet filters and Local Binary Pattern operators (LBP), which are integrated with more classical families of texture filters, such as co-occurrence matrices, Laws filters and wavelet transforms. Results with Brodatz compositions and outdoor images are evaluated and discussed, being the basis for a comparative study about the discrimination capabilities of those different families of texture methods, which have been traditionally applied on their own.

[1]  Domènec Puig,et al.  Supervised texture classification by integration of multiple texture methods and evaluation windows , 2007, Image Vis. Comput..

[2]  Trygve Randen,et al.  Filtering for Texture Classification: A Comparative Study , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Domenec Puig,et al.  Automatic texture feature selection for image pixel classification , 2006, Pattern Recognit..

[4]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  Texture Features for Browsing and Retrieval of Image Data , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Lianping Chen,et al.  Effects of different Gabor filters parameters on image retrieval by texture , 2004, 10th International Multimedia Modelling Conference, 2004. Proceedings..

[6]  Phil Brodatz,et al.  Textures: A Photographic Album for Artists and Designers , 1966 .

[7]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  Color and texture descriptors , 2001, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[8]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..