When to parasitize? A dynamic optimization model of reproductive strategies in a cooperative breeder.

We consider a cooperatively breeding group and find the optimal pattern of reproductive parasitism by a subordinate helper as a function of its body size, and hence the share of reproduction obtained by the subordinate. We develop the model for the social system of the cooperatively breeding cichlid fish Neolamprologus pulcher but the general framework is also applicable to other cooperative systems. In addition to behaving cooperatively by sharing tasks, sexually mature male cichlid helpers may directly parasitize the reproduction of dominant breeders in the group. We investigate the relative influence of life history and behavioural variables including growth, parasitism capacity, future reproductive fitness benefits and costs, relatedness and expulsion risk on the optimal reproductive strategy of subordinates. In a detailed analysis of the parameter space we show that a male helper should base its decision to parasitize primarily on an increase in expulsion risk resulting from reproductive parasitism (punishment), intra-group relatedness and the parasitism capacity. If expulsion risk is high then helpers should not parasitize reproduction at medium body size but should parasitize either when small or large.

[1]  M. Taborsky.  Breeder-Helper Conflict in a Cichlid Fish With Broodcare Helpers: an Experimental Analysis , 1985 .

[2]  名越 誠.  Survival of broods under parental care and parental roles of the cichlid fish, Lamprologus toae, in Lake Tanganyika. , 1987 .

[3]  M. Koops,et al.  Redhead reproductive strategy choices: a dynamic state variable model , 1999 .

[4]  Richard F. Gunst,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[5]  Hanna Kokko,et al.  Social queuing in animal societies: a dynamic model of reproductive skew , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  S. Vehrencamp.  The Roles of Individual, Kin, and Group Selection in the Evolution of Sociality , 1979 .

[7]  M. Taborsky,et al.  Helpers in fish , 1981, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  A. Houston,et al.  The Common Currency for Behavioral Decisions , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[9]  D. Kramer,et al.  Is Sperm Cheap? Limited Male Fertility and Female Choice in the Lemon Tetra (Pisces, Characidae) , 1982, Science.

[10]  M. Taborsky.  The evolution of bourgeois, parasitic, and cooperative reproductive behaviors in fishes. , 2001, The Journal of heredity.

[11]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Reproductive skew and the threat of eviction: a new perspective , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  M. Taborsky.  Broodcare helpers in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi: Their costs and benefits , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[14]  L. Keller.  Queen number and sociality in insects , 1993 .

[15]  M. Taborsky.  Bourgeois and parasitic tactics: do we need collective, functional terms for alternative reproductive behaviours? , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  P. Stoerig,et al.  Social behaviour of Lamprologus species: functions and mechanisms , 1986 .

[17]  S. Emlen.  The Evolution of Helping. II. The Role of Behavioral Conflict , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[18]  G. Boulenger.  Report on the collection of fishes made by Mr. J. E. S. Moore in Lake Tanganyika during his expedition, 1895-96. , 1898 .

[19]  Cohn W. Clark,et al.  Dynamic models of behavior: An extension of life history theory. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  M. Taborsky,et al.  Behavioural time–energy budgets of cooperatively breedingNeolamprologus pulcher(Pisces: Cichlidae) , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  Stephen T. Emlen,et al.  The Evolution of Helping. I. An Ecological Constraints Model , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[23]  P. Dixon,et al.  Reducing bias in estimates of the richards growth function shape parameter. , 1990, Growth, development, and aging : GDA.

[24]  S. Freeman,et al.  The distribution of conspecific nest parasitism in birds , 1989 .

[25]  R. Johnstone.  Models of reproductive skew: A review and synthesis (Invited Article) , 2000 .

[26]  M. Nagoshi.  Survival of broods under parental care and parental roles of the cichlid fish,Lamprologus toae, in Lake Tanganyika , 1987 .

[27]  C. Clark,et al.  Dynamic State Variable Models in Ecology , 2000 .

[28]  M. Taborsky,et al.  Reproductive parasitism of broodcare helpers in a cooperatively breeding fish , 1999 .

[29]  Raymond J. O'Connor,et al.  Models of Adaptive Behaviour: An Approach Based on State. , 2001 .

[30]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Models of Adaptive Behaviour: An Approach Based on State , 1999 .

[31]  Edmund J. Collins,et al.  Optimality Models in Behavioral Biology , 2001, SIAM Rev..

[32]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[33]  C. Clark,et al.  Dynamic State Variable Models in Ecology: Methods and Applications , 2001 .

[34]  M. Taborsky,et al.  The metabolic rates associated with resting, and with the performance of agonistic, submissive and digging behaviours in the cichlid fish Neolamprologus pulcher (Pisces: Cichlidae) , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology B.

[35]  K. Holekamp,et al.  Reproductive skew among males in a female-dominated mammalian society , 2002 .

[36]  M. Taborsky.  Sperm competition in fish: `bourgeois' males and parasitic spawning. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[37]  S. Balshine,et al.  Correlates of group size in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish (Neolamprologus pulcher) , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[38]  Peter Nonacs,et al.  Measuring and Using Skew in the Study of Social Behavior and Evolution , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[39]  L. Natr,et al.  Clark, C.W., Mangel, M.: Dynamic State Variable Models in Ecology: Methods and Applications , 2000, Photosynthetica.

[40]  Marc Mangel,et al.  Dynamic models in behavioural and evolutionary ecology , 1988, Nature.

[41]  Godwin C. Ovuworie,et al.  Mathematical Programming: Structures and Algorithms , 1979 .

[42]  L. Keller,et al.  Reproductive sharing in animal societies: reproductive incentives or incomplete control by dominant breeders? , 1998 .

[43]  M. Cichoń,et al.  Ageing and typical survivorship curves result from optimal resource allocation , 2000 .

[44]  浩哉 川那部,et al.  Fish communities in Lake Tanganyika , 1997 .

[45]  R. Bellman.  Dynamic programming. , 1957, Science.

[46]  M. Taborsky.  Sneakers, Satellites, and Helpers: Parasitic and Cooperative Behavior in Fish Reproduction , 1994 .

[47]  L. Keller,et al.  Tests of reproductive-skew models in social insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[48]  R. Bellman,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Markov Processes , 1960 .

[49]  J. Lucas,et al.  Cooperative Breeding in Mammals: Dynamic Optimization and Cooperative Breeding: An Evaluation of Future Fitness Effects , 1996 .

[50]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[51]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Markov Processes , 1960 .

[52]  T. Clutton‐Brock.  Reproductive skew, concessions and limited control. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[53]  D. Ludwig,et al.  Life-History Strategies for Energy Gain and Predator Avoidance Under Time Constraints , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[54]  Bruce Hannon,et al.  Dynamic Modeling , 1994, Springer US.

[55]  S. Stearns,et al.  The Evolution of Life Histories , 1992 .

[56]  A. Tsoularis,et al.  Analysis of logistic growth models. , 2002, Mathematical biosciences.

[57]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Genesis of Bimodal Size Distributions in Species Cohorts , 1982 .