Reassessing taxonomic relationships in the Berkheya clade (Asteraceae, Arctotideae-Gorteriinae) : the utility of Achene morphology

The genus Berkheya is paraphyletic with the related genera Cullumia , Cuspidia , Didelta and Heterorhachis embedded within a broader clade termed the ‘ Berkheya clade’. As a contribution towards reassessment of species relationships and delimitation of species groupings within the clade, the utility of external achene morphology for supporting natural species groups within the clade was evaluated. Achenes from 67 species and 10 infraspecific taxa were examined, including representatives of each genus currently recognised in the Berkheya clade. Achene pubescence and pappus characteristics (e.g., scale shape and number of scales within a series) were indicated to be particularly variable and thus less reliable for assessment of species relationships. Of the currently recognised genera, only segregation of Cullumia was supported by achene and pappus characteristics. Species groupings implicit in Roessler’s infrageneric classification of eight series within Berkheya were to a large extent supported. However, in particular, series Speciosae was indicated to be a disparate species grouping and the distinction of series Angustae and Cruciatae is not supported by achene and pappus morphology. Achene and pappus characteristics suggest several novel species groupings (e.g. an affinity between Berkheya cuneata , B. ferox and B. spinosa ). Although the taxonomic sampling in published molecular phylogenetic analyses is limited, achene and pappus morphology partially supports clades resolved in prevailing phylogenetic reconstructions for the clade. More complete sampling in future molecular phylogenetic analyses is required to test novel species affinities suggested in the present study and to explore the evolution of the achene and pappus in the Berkheya clade.

[1]  A. Anderberg,et al.  Morphology and taxonomic reclassification of Gorteria (Asteraceae) , 2014 .

[2]  N. Bergh,et al.  A new species of Berkheya (Asteraceae, Arctotideae) from the Northern Cape, South Africa , 2014 .

[3]  Frida Stångberg.  Phylogenetics and taxonomy of the Gorteria clade (Asteraceae-Arctotideae) , 2014 .

[4]  Hang Sun,et al.  Systematic significance of achene morphology in Soroseris, Syncalathium and Parasyncalathium (Asteraceae: Cichorieae) , 2013 .

[5]  N. Phaliso.  A systematic study of Berkheya and allies (Compositae) , 2013 .

[6]  P. Goldblatt,et al.  Asteraceae. Berkheya jardineana (Arctotideae—Gorteriinae), a new dwarf perennial from the Swartruggens, Western Cape. , 2012 .

[7]  P. Goldblatt,et al.  ASTERACEAE: BERKHEYA CHRYSANTHEMOIDES AND HETERORHACHIS HYSTRIX, TWO NEW SPECIES OF ARCTOTIDEAE-GORTERIINAE FROM THE SOUTHWESTERN CAPE , 2010 .

[8]  A. Gove,et al.  Convergent evolution of seed dispersal by ants, and phylogeny and biogeography in flowering plants: A global survey , 2010 .

[9]  V. Funk.  Systematics, evolution, and biogeography of Compositae , 2009 .

[10]  V. Funk,et al.  Phylogeny of the Spiny African Daisies (Compositae, tribe Arctotideae, subtribe Gorteriinae) based on trnL-F, ndhF, and ITS sequence data. , 2008, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[11]  D. Crawford,et al.  Comparative capitular morphology and anatomy of Coreopsis L. and bidens L. (compositae), including a review of generic boundaries , 2008, Brittonia.

[12]  P. Karis.  Tribe Arctotideae Cass. , 2007 .

[13]  P. Karis.  Morphological data indicates two major clades of the subtribe Gorteriinae (Asteraceae‐Arctotideae) , 2006 .

[14]  N. Barker.  A review and survey of basicarpy, geocarpy, and amphicarpy in the African and Madagascan Flora , 2005 .

[15]  N. Barker,et al.  Morphology of cypselae in subtribe arctotidinae (compositae-arctotideae) and ITS taxonomic implications3 , 2005 .

[16]  V. Funk,et al.  Insights into the evolution of the tribe Arctoteae (Compositae: subfamily Cichorioideae s.s.) using trnL-F, ndhF, and ITS , 2004 .

[17]  I. Breitwieser,et al.  Phylogenetic relationships and character evolution in New Zealand and selected Australian Gnaphalieae (Compositae) inferred from morphological and anatomical data , 2003 .

[18]  P. Herman.  Observations on hairs in the capitula of some southern African Asteraceae genera , 2001 .

[19]  Sharon L. Wilson,et al.  The systematic value of the surface micromorphology and anatomy of cypselae of some members of the Senecioneae, Liabeae and Vernonieae (Asteraceae) , 1997 .

[20]  J. Krebs,et al.  SEED DISPERSAL BY ANTS , 1987 .

[21]  W. Bond.  Seed dispersal by ants in shrublands of the Cape Province and its evolutionary implications , 1983 .

[22]  J. Grau.  DIE TESTA DER MUTISIEAE UND IHRE SYSTEMATISCHE BEDEUTUNG , 1980 .

[23]  R. Melville.  Contributions to the Flora of Australia: VI , 1960 .

[24]  H. Roessler.  EINE NEUE BERKHEYA AUS TRANSVAAL , 1959 .

[25]  B. Burtt.  Didelta and Cuspidia , 1948 .

[26]  E. Merrill.  A Critical Consideration of Houttuyn's New Genera and New Species of Plants, 1773-1783 , 1938, Journal of the Arnold Arboretum..

[27]  H. G. Fourcade.  CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE FLORA OF THE KNYSNA AND NEIGHBOURING DIVISIONS , 1932 .

[28]  J. Davy.  New or Noteworthy South African Plants.: VII , 1922 .

[29]  G. C. Druce.  Nomenclatural Notes: chiefly African and Australian , 1917 .

[30]  H. Bolus,et al.  CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE AFRICAN FLORA , 1905 .

[31]  Carl von Linné,et al.  Caroli a Linné Species plantarum , 1830 .

[32]  Carl Peter Thunberg.  Flora Capensis : sistens plantas promontorii Bonæ Spei Africes : secundum systema sexuale emendatum ... / , 1818 .