The influence of personal protection equipment, occupant body size, and restraint system on the frontal impact responses of Hybrid III ATDs in tactical vehicles

ABSTRACT Objective: Although advanced restraint systems, such as seat belt pretensioners and load limiters, can provide improved occupant protection in crashes, such technologies are currently not utilized in military vehicles. The design and use of military vehicles presents unique challenges to occupant safety—including differences in compartment geometry and occupant clothing and gear—that make direct application of optimal civilian restraint systems to military vehicles inappropriate. For military vehicle environments, finite element (FE) modeling can be used to assess various configurations of restraint systems and determine the optimal configuration that minimizes injury risk to the occupant. The models must, however, be validated against physical tests before implementation. The objective of this study was therefore to provide the data necessary for FE model validation by conducting sled tests using anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs). A secondary objective of this test series was to examine the influence of occupant body size (5th percentile female, 50th percentile male, and 95th percentile male), military gear (helmet/vest/tactical assault panels), seat belt type (3-point and 5-point), and advanced seat belt technologies (pretensioner and load limiter) on occupant kinematics and injury risk in frontal crashes. Methods: In total, 20 frontal sled tests were conducted using a custom sled buck that was reconfigurable to represent both the driver and passenger compartments of a light tactical military vehicle. Tests were performed at a delta-V of 30 mph and a peak acceleration of 25 g. The sled tests used the Hybrid III 5th percentile female, 50th percentile male, and 95th percentile male ATDs outfitted with standard combat boots and advanced combat helmets. In some tests, the ATDs were outfitted with additional military gear, which included an improved outer tactical vest (IOTV), IOTV and squad automatic weapon (SAW) gunner with a tactical assault panel (TAP), or IOTV and rifleman with TAP. ATD kinematics and injury outcomes were determined for each test. Results: Maximum excursions were generally greater in the 95th percentile male compared to the 50th percentile male ATD and in ATDs wearing TAP compared to ATDs without TAP. Pretensioners and load limiters were effective in decreasing excursions and injury measures, even when the ATD was outfitted in military gear. Conclusions: ATD injury response and kinematics are influenced by the size of the ATD, military gear, and restraint system. This study has provided important data for validating FE models of military occupants, which can be used for design optimization of military vehicle restraint systems.

[1]  W. C. Bell,et al.  Fluid/Structure Interaction Computational Investigation of Blast-Wave Mitigation Efficacy of the Advanced Combat Helmet , 2011 .

[2]  Dainius J. Dalmotas,et al.  An NCAP Star Rating System for Older Occupants , 2013 .

[3]  Priya Prasad,et al.  Evaluation of the field relevance of several injury risk functions. , 2010, Stapp car crash journal.

[4]  David C. Viano,et al.  Field Data Analysis of Rear Occupant Injuries Part I: Adults and Teenagers , 2003 .

[5]  C. Tingvall,et al.  Influence of Airbags and Seatbelt Pretensioners on AIS1 Neck Injuries for Belted Occupants in Frontal Impacts. , 2000, Stapp car crash journal.

[6]  Janet Brelin-Fornari,et al.  Effect of Seat Belts Equipped with Pretensioners on Rear Seat Adult Occupants in High-Severity Rear Impact , 2008 .

[7]  Matthew P. Reed,et al.  The Seated Soldier Study: Posture and Body Shape in Vehicle Seats , 2013 .

[8]  Erik G. Takhounts,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED INJURY CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE RESTRAINT SYSTEMS - II , 1999 .

[9]  Shashi Kuppa,et al.  An overview of knee-thigh-hip injuries in frontal crashes in the United States , 2003 .

[10]  Nicolas Newell,et al.  The comparative behaviour of two combat boots under impact , 2011, Injury Prevention.

[11]  Harold J Mertz,et al.  Effects of shoulder belt limit forces on adult thoracic protection in frontal collisions. , 2007, Stapp car crash journal.

[12]  Mariusz Ziejewski,et al.  Examination of the protective roles of helmet/faceshield and directionality for human head under blast waves , 2015, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[13]  Jason Forman,et al.  Rear seat occupant safety: an investigation of a progressive force-limiting, pretensioning 3-point belt system using adult PMHS in frontal sled tests. , 2009, Stapp car crash journal.

[14]  Cong Chen,et al.  Effects of occupant size, military gear, seatbelt type, and advanced seatbelt features on occupant kinematics in tactical vehicles during frontal crashes , 2015 .

[15]  Mica Grujicic,et al.  Computational investigation of the effect of up-armouring on the reduction in occupant injury or fatality in a prototypical high-mobility multi-purpose wheeled vehicle subjected to mine blast , 2009 .

[16]  A M Hill,et al.  Blast Mines: Physics, Injury Mechanisms And Vehicle Protection , 2009, Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps.

[17]  Jeffrey Croteau,et al.  HEAD EXCURSION OF SEAT BELTED CADAVER, VOLUNTEERS AND HYBRID III ATD IN A DYNAMIC/STATIC ROLLOVER FIXTURE. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS , 1997 .

[18]  Richard M. Morgan,et al.  A Study of the Rear Seat Occupant Safety using a 10-Year-Old Child Dummy in the New Car Assessment Program , 2008 .

[19]  Clifford C. Chou,et al.  Finite Element Investigation of Seatbelt Systems for Improving Occupant Protection during Rollover Crashes , 2009 .

[20]  Jingwen Hu,et al.  Effects of Crash Pulse, Impact Angle, Occupant Size, Front Seat Location, and Restraint System on Rear Seat Occupant Protection , 2015 .

[21]  F Bendjellal,et al.  Comparison of Thoracic Injury Risk in Frontal Car Crashes for Occupant Restrained without Belt Load Limiters and Those Restrained with 6 kN and 4 kN Belt Load Limiters. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[22]  G. Song,et al.  Vehicle and occupant safety protection CAE simulation , 2010 .

[23]  Christine Raasch,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Seat Belt Pretensioners on Occupant Kinematics During Rollover , 2006 .

[24]  Jason Forman,et al.  Occupant restraint in the rear seat: ATD responses to standard and pre-tensioning, force-limiting belt restraints. , 2008, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[25]  Matthew P. Reed,et al.  A Pilot Study of Occupant Accommodation and Seat Belt Fit for Law Enforcement Officers , 2016 .

[26]  Daniel P. Faust,et al.  Safety Belt and Occupant Factors Influencing Thoracic & Upper Abdominal Injuries in Frontal Crashes , 2011 .

[27]  Rodney S. Thomson,et al.  Effects of body-borne equipment on occupant forces during a simulated helicopter crash , 2014 .

[28]  Jeffrey Richard Crandall,et al.  Thoracic response and injury with belt, driver side airbag, and force limited belt restraint systems , 1996 .

[29]  Kristy B. Arbogast,et al.  Head Injury Causation Scenarios for Belted, Rear-Seated Children in Frontal Impacts , 2011, Traffic injury prevention.

[30]  Janet Brelin-Fornari,et al.  Effects of Pretensioners and Load Limiters on 50th Male and 5th Female Seated in Rear Seat during a Frontal Collision , 2015 .