General image fiber tool: A concept for automated evaluation of fiber diameters in SEM images

Abstract Fiber imaging is becoming increasingly important in various fields. The current standard method of quality assurance is the manual quantification of fiber diameters in Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images, which is time consuming and introduces bias. However, due to partly insufficient reliability of automated software, improved concepts are required. We introduce an innovative routine for computerized evaluation of fiber diameters in SEM images with improved accuracy. This General Image Fiber Tool (GIFT) automatically calculates the average fiber diameter and standard deviation by statistical analysis. In a comparative study, GIFT was benchmarked to an existing popular fiber analysis tool, DiameterJ, and manual quantification. GIFT has detected fiber diameters with improved accuracy in numerous SEM images, and has been shown to be a remarkably sound method when challenged with difficult image types. The work presented here validates the GIFT concept and demonstrates its potential for applications in biomedicine and various other fields.

[1]  Gabriel Cristóbal,et al.  Automated Diatom Classification (Part A): Handcrafted Feature Approaches , 2017 .

[2]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Recursive Implementation of Erosions and Dilations Along Discrete Lines at Arbitrary Angles , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  C. Stender,et al.  A validated software application to measure fiber organization in soft tissue , 2016, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[4]  H. Döbereiner,et al.  A lumped parameter model of endoplasm flow in Physarum polycephalum explains migration and polarization-induced asymmetry during the onset of locomotion , 2019, PloS one.

[5]  Ryan Patrick Murphy,et al.  SIMPoly: A Matlab-Based Image Analysis Tool to Measure Electrospun Polymer Scaffold Fiber Diameter , 2020, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[6]  K. Kador,et al.  Characterization of extracellular matrix modified poly(ε-caprolactone) electrospun scaffolds with differing fiber orientations for corneal stroma regeneration. , 2020, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[7]  T. Błachowicz,et al.  Investigating surface properties of fibers and yarns by image processing and statistical analysis techniques , 2018 .

[8]  Xinjian Chen,et al.  A Hierarchical Image Matting Model for Blood Vessel Segmentation in Fundus Images , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Bugao Xu,et al.  Automated measurements of fiber diameters in melt-blown nonwovens , 2014 .

[10]  Weidong Yu,et al.  Orientation image analysis of electrospun submicro-fibers based on Hough transform and Regionprops function , 2017 .

[11]  R. Pappalardo,et al.  Analysis of very-high-resolution Galileo images and implications for resurfacing mechanisms on Europa , 2018, Icarus.

[12]  Arezki Boudaoud,et al.  FibrilTool, an ImageJ plug-in to quantify fibrillar structures in raw microscopy images , 2014, Nature Protocols.

[13]  S. J. Newman,et al.  Crawling without wiggling: muscular mechanisms and kinematics of rectilinear locomotion in boa constrictors , 2018, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[14]  Astrid Junker,et al.  Semi-automated Root Image Analysis (saRIA) , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[15]  N. Wang,et al.  Misalignment measurement with dual-frequency moiré fringe in nanoimprint lithography. , 2020, Optics express.

[16]  Nick Tucker,et al.  A comparison of automated and manual techniques for measurement of electrospun fibre diameter , 2014 .

[17]  Xingyu Jiang,et al.  Biomimetic Collagen Nanofibrous Materials for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2010 .

[18]  P. Bártolo,et al.  Advances in electrospun skin substitutes , 2016 .

[19]  A. Goldstein,et al.  Effect of fiber diameter on spreading, proliferation, and differentiation of osteoblastic cells on electrospun poly(lactic acid) substrates. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[20]  Automated image-analysis method for the quantification of fiber morphometry and fiber type population in human skeletal muscle , 2019, Skeletal Muscle.

[21]  M. Noordin,et al.  A review of evolution of electrospun tissue engineering scaffold: From two dimensions to three dimensions , 2017, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[22]  M. Gevelber,et al.  Investigation of electrospun fiber diameter distribution and process variations , 2010 .

[23]  A. K. Haghi,et al.  APPLICATION OF DIRECT TRACKING METHOD FOR MEASURING ELECTROSPUN NANOFIBER DIAMETER , 2009 .

[24]  Shawn H. Lim,et al.  Reducing electrospun nanofiber diameter and variability using cationic amphiphiles , 2007 .

[25]  A. K. Haghi,et al.  Distance transform algorithm for measuring nanofiber diameter , 2008 .

[26]  Sumathi Poobal,et al.  Crack detection using image processing: A critical review and analysis , 2017, Alexandria Engineering Journal.

[27]  S. Kuang,et al.  Harnessing Fiber Diameter-Dependent Effects of Myoblasts Toward Biomimetic Scaffold-Based Skeletal Muscle Regeneration , 2020, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.

[28]  Chi-Tang Li,et al.  Improved accuracy of the laser diffraction technique for diameter measurement of small fibres , 1990 .

[29]  Hongjun Song,et al.  The influence of fiber diameter of electrospun substrates on neural stem cell differentiation and proliferation. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[30]  B. Pourdeyhimi,et al.  Measuring Fiber Diameter Distribution in Nonwovens , 1999 .

[31]  Kapil Bharti,et al.  Dataset for the validation and use of DiameterJ an open source nanofiber diameter measurement tool , 2015, Data in brief.

[32]  Aabid Shariff,et al.  Automated Image Analysis for High-Content Screening and Analysis , 2010, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[33]  Planktonic larval duration, early growth, and the influence of dietary input on the otolith microstructure of Scolopsis bilineatus (Nemipteridae) , 2019, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[34]  Pierantonio Facco,et al.  Artificial Vision System for the Automatic Measurement of Interfiber Pore Characteristics and Fiber Diameter Distribution in Nanofiber Assemblies , 2010 .

[35]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[36]  J. Chiverton,et al.  Automatic diameter and orientation distribution determination of fibrous materials in micro X‐ray CT imaging data , 2018, Journal of microscopy.

[37]  Kevin W. Eliceiri,et al.  ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data , 2017, BMC Bioinformatics.

[38]  The mechanical principles behind the golden ratio distribution of veins in plant leaves , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[39]  Francesca Papadopulos,et al.  Common Tasks in Microscopic and Ultrastructural Image Analysis Using ImageJ , 2007, Ultrastructural pathology.

[40]  Ivan Usov,et al.  FiberApp: An Open-Source Software for Tracking and Analyzing Polymers, Filaments, Biomacromolecules, and Fibrous Objects , 2015 .

[41]  V. Martínez-Martínez,et al.  Method to estimate the medullar rays angle in pieces of wood based on tree-ring structure: application to planks of Quercus petraea , 2018, Wood Science and Technology.

[42]  S. Lake,et al.  Three-dimensional computation of fibre orientation, diameter and branching in segmented image stacks of fibrous networks , 2020, Journal of the Royal Society Interface.

[43]  Gheyath K Nasrallah,et al.  Review of recent research on biomedical applications of electrospun polymer nanofibers for improved wound healing. , 2016, Nanomedicine.

[44]  S. Baheti,et al.  Characterization of fiber diameter using image analysis , 2017 .

[45]  Fathollah Moztarzadeh,et al.  Design and manufacture of neural tissue engineering scaffolds using hyaluronic acid and polycaprolactone nanofibers with controlled porosity. , 2016, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[46]  S. Haider,et al.  A comprehensive review summarizing the effect of electrospinning parameters and potential applications of nanofibers in biomedical and biotechnology , 2015, Arabian Journal of Chemistry.

[47]  J. G. N. Baines,et al.  Fiber diameter measurements and their calibration , 1990 .

[48]  Jahangir Mohammed,et al.  A Cellular Automata based Optimal Edge Detection Technique using Twenty-Five Neighborhood Model , 2013, ArXiv.

[49]  H. T. Aiyelabegan,et al.  Fundamentals of protein and cell interactions in biomaterials. , 2017, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[50]  M. Kamasak,et al.  Automated nanofiber diameter measurement in SEM images using a robust image analysis method , 2014 .

[51]  Kapil Bharti,et al.  Training to Improve Precision and Accuracy in the Measurement of Fiber Morphology , 2016, PloS one.

[52]  T. Anfodillo,et al.  Axial anatomy of the leaf midrib provides new insights into the hydraulic architecture and cavitation patterns of Acer pseudoplatanus leaves , 2019, Journal of experimental botany.

[53]  Mohammad Reza Meybodi,et al.  Cellular edge detection: Combining cellular automata and cellular learning automata , 2015 .

[54]  N. Grabow,et al.  Computed fiber evaluation of SEM images using DiameterJ , 2020, Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering.

[55]  Zdenek Smekal,et al.  Decision Support Framework for Parkinson’s Disease Based on Novel Handwriting Markers , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[56]  M. Yaszemski,et al.  Workshop on the characterization of fiber-based scaffolds: Challenges, progress, and future directions. , 2019, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[57]  T. Uyar,et al.  Electrospinning of gelatin with tunable fiber morphology from round to flat/ribbon. , 2017, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[58]  C. McKenna Neuman,et al.  A wind tunnel investigation of particle segregation, ripple formation and armouring within sand beds of systematically varied texture , 2017 .

[59]  A New Image Analysis Based Method for Measuring Electrospun Nanofiber Diameter , 2007, Nanoscale Research Letters.

[60]  S. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Automated Methods to Determine Electrospun Fiber Alignment and Diameter Using the Radon Transform , 2013 .

[61]  N. Pan,et al.  Morphological Characterization of Individual Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers , 2011 .

[62]  E. Mele,et al.  Cellular Response to Surface Morphology: Electrospinning and Computational Modeling , 2018, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[63]  Kapil Bharti,et al.  DiameterJ: A validated open source nanofiber diameter measurement tool. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[64]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[65]  Jan Bartovsky,et al.  GPU implementation of linear morphological openings with arbitrary angle , 2012, Journal of Real-Time Image Processing.

[66]  C. Weitz,et al.  Morphologic Diversity of Martian Ripples: Implications for Large‐Ripple Formation , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.

[67]  S. Zabler,et al.  The Impact of Melt Electrowritten Scaffold Design on Porosity Determined by X-Ray Microtomography , 2019, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[68]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Morphological Image Analysis , 1999 .

[69]  Hyung Sup Kim,et al.  Determination of electrospun fiber diameter distributions using image analysis processing , 2008 .