Spatial and temporal dynamics of superspreading events in the 2014–2015 West Africa Ebola epidemic

Significance For many infections, some infected individuals transmit to disproportionately more susceptibles than others, a phenomenon referred to as “superspreading.” Understanding superspreading can facilitate devising individually targeted control measures, which may outperform population-level measures. Superspreading has been described for a recent Ebola virus (EBOV) outbreak, but systematic characterizations of its spatiotemporal dynamics are still lacking. We introduce a statistical framework that allows us to identify core characteristics of EBOV superspreading. We find that the epidemic was largely driven and sustained by superspreadings that are ubiquitous throughout the outbreak and that age is an important demographic predictor for superspreading. Our results highlight the importance of control measures targeted at potential superspreaders and enhance understanding of causes and consequences of superspreading for EBOV. The unprecedented scale of the Ebola outbreak in Western Africa (2014–2015) has prompted an explosion of efforts to understand the transmission dynamics of the virus and to analyze the performance of possible containment strategies. Models have focused primarily on the reproductive numbers of the disease that represent the average number of secondary infections produced by a random infectious individual. However, these population-level estimates may conflate important systematic variation in the number of cases generated by infected individuals, particularly found in spatially localized transmission and superspreading events. Although superspreading features prominently in first-hand narratives of Ebola transmission, its dynamics have not been systematically characterized, hindering refinements of future epidemic predictions and explorations of targeted interventions. We used Bayesian model inference to integrate individual-level spatial information with other epidemiological data of community-based (undetected within clinical-care systems) cases and to explicitly infer distribution of the cases generated by each infected individual. Our results show that superspreaders play a key role in sustaining onward transmission of the epidemic, and they are responsible for a significant proportion (∼61%) of the infections. Our results also suggest age as a key demographic predictor for superspreading. We also show that community-based cases may have progressed more rapidly than those notified within clinical-care systems, and most transmission events occurred in a relatively short distance (with median value of 2.51 km). Our results stress the importance of characterizing superspreading of Ebola, enhance our current understanding of its spatiotemporal dynamics, and highlight the potential importance of targeted control measures.

[1]  Samuel Soubeyrand,et al.  A Bayesian Inference Framework to Reconstruct Transmission Trees Using Epidemiological and Genetic Data , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  Christopher Dye,et al.  The international Ebola emergency. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Dylan B. George,et al.  Mathematical modeling of the West Africa Ebola epidemic , 2015, eLife.

[4]  L. Matthews,et al.  The construction and analysis of epidemic trees with reference to the 2001 UK foot–and–mouth outbreak , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Jonathan Dushoff,et al.  Modeling Post-death Transmission of Ebola: Challenges for Inference and Opportunities for Control , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Gaël Thébaud,et al.  Integrating genetic and epidemiological data to determine transmission pathways of foot-and-mouth disease virus , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Jonathan Mermin,et al.  Improving Burial Practices and Cemetery Management During an Ebola Virus Disease Epidemic — Sierra Leone, 2014 , 2015, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[8]  C. Althaus Estimating the Reproduction Number of Ebola Virus (EBOV) During the 2014 Outbreak in West Africa , 2014, PLoS currents.

[9]  C. Althaus,et al.  Ebola superspreading , 2015, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[10]  Gavin J. Gibson,et al.  Estimating parameters in stochastic compartmental models using Markov chain methods , 1998 .

[11]  Tanja Stadler,et al.  Insights into the Early Epidemic Spread of Ebola in Sierra Leone Provided by Viral Sequence Data , 2014, PLoS currents.

[12]  Y. Xia,et al.  Measles Metapopulation Dynamics: A Gravity Model for Epidemiological Coupling and Dynamics , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[13]  B J Cowling,et al.  Preliminary epidemiological assessment of MERS-CoV outbreak in South Korea, May to June 2015. , 2015, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[14]  Tom Fletcher,et al.  Clinical presentation of patients with Ebola virus disease in Conakry, Guinea. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  W. Team,et al.  West African Ebola Epidemic after One Year — Slowing but Not Yet under Control , 2015 .

[16]  R M May,et al.  Age-related changes in the rate of disease transmission: implications for the design of vaccination programmes , 1985, Journal of Hygiene.

[17]  Chao Liu,et al.  Transmission network of the 2014–2015 Ebola epidemic in Sierra Leone , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[18]  S. Groseclose,et al.  Completeness of notifiable infectious disease reporting in the United States: an analytical literature review. , 2002, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  D. Fisman,et al.  Early Epidemic Dynamics of the West African 2014 Ebola Outbreak: Estimates Derived with a Simple Two-Parameter Model , 2014, PLoS currents.

[20]  Edward C Holmes,et al.  Virological factors that increase the transmissibility of emerging human viruses , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  S. Chib,et al.  Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm , 1995 .

[22]  Mark A. Miller,et al.  Synchrony, Waves, and Spatial Hierarchies in the Spread of Influenza , 2006, Science.

[23]  Huldrych F. Günthard,et al.  Inferring Epidemic Contact Structure from Phylogenetic Trees , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[24]  Mikiko Senga,et al.  Ebola virus disease in West Africa--the first 9 months of the epidemic and forward projections. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  Arthur Getis,et al.  Spatial Interaction and Spatial Autocorrelation: A Cross-Product Approach , 1991 .

[26]  G. Gibson,et al.  New model diagnostics for spatio-temporal systems in epidemiology and ecology , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[27]  Adam Kucharski,et al.  Temporal Changes in Ebola Transmission in Sierra Leone and Implications for Control Requirements: a Real-time Modelling Study , 2015, PLoS currents.

[28]  Alison P Galvani,et al.  Effect of Ebola progression on transmission and control in Liberia. , 2015, Annals of internal medicine.

[29]  Simon Cauchemez,et al.  Chains of transmission and control of Ebola virus disease in Conakry, Guinea, in 2014: an observational study. , 2015, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[30]  Gavin J. Gibson,et al.  A Systematic Bayesian Integration of Epidemiological and Genetic Data , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  A. Kucharski,et al.  The role of superspreading in Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) transmission. , 2015, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[32]  M. Carton,et al.  Under-reporting of notifiable infectious disease hospitalizations in a health board region in Ireland: room for improvement? , 2007, Epidemiology and Infection.

[33]  P. E. Kopp,et al.  Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence , 2005, Nature.