Habitual and Value-guided Purchase Behavior

Society increasingly requests that individuals adopt environmentally benign behavior. Information campaigns purported to change people's attitudes are often regarded as prerequisites to installing such changes. While such information may be a necessary step, it is not sufficient by itself. We argue that many everyday behaviors with environmental consequences are habitual, and that little attention is given to information directed toward changing these habitual behaviors. In other instances, behavior is guided by values in a more reflective process. However, other information besides environmental consequences may draw a person's attention and affect behavioral choice. Using surveys and experimental studies targeting consumer behavior, we studied under what conditions different kinds of information is likely to influence people with varying levels of environmental concern. Based on results from these studies, implications for behavioral change are discussed.

[1]  C. H. Hansen,et al.  Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[3]  D. Wegner,et al.  Control and automaticity in social life. , 1998 .

[4]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[5]  B. Verplanken,et al.  ATTITUDE VERSUS GENERAL HABIT -- ANTECEDENTS OF TRAVEL MODE CHOICE / , 1994 .

[6]  Charles Francis,et al.  Food system orientation and quality perception among consumers and producers of organic food in Hedmark County, Norway , 2001 .

[7]  L. Åberg,et al.  Attitudes towards organic foods among Swedish consumers. , 2001 .

[8]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Algebra: Integration Theory Applied to Social Attribution1 , 1974 .

[9]  David C. McClelland,et al.  How Do Self-Attributed and Implicit Motives Differ?. , 1989 .

[10]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  S. Schwartz Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values , 1994 .

[12]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: the mobilization-minimization hypothesis. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  G. Grankvist,et al.  THE IMPORTANCE OF BELIEFS AND PURCHASE CRITERIA IN THE CHOICE OF ECO-LABELED FOOD PRODUCTS , 2001 .

[14]  G. Grankvist,et al.  The Impact of Environmental Labelling on Consumer Preference: Negative vs. Positive Labels , 2004 .

[15]  B. Verplanken,et al.  Habit, attitude, and planned behaviour : is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of goal-directed automaticity? , 1999 .

[16]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. , 1980 .

[17]  U. Dahlstrand,et al.  Pro-Environmental Habits: Propensity Levels in Behavioral Change1 , 1997 .