Phytoplankton of rhithral rivers : its origin , diversity and possible use for quality-12 assessment 13

This manuscript is contextually identical with the following published paper: 2 Ágnes Bolgovics, Gábor Várbíró, Éva Ács, Zsuzsa Trábert, Keve Tihamér Kiss, Virág Pozderka, Judit 3 Görgényi, Pál Boda, Balázs-A Lukács, Zsolt Nagy-László, András Abonyi, Gábor Borics, Phytoplankton of 4 rhithral rivers: Its origin, diversity and possible use for quality-assessment, In Ecological Indicators, 5 Volume 81, 2017, Pages 587-596, ISSN 1470-160X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.052. 6

[1]  J. Padisák,et al.  Phycogeography of freshwater phytoplankton , 2016 .

[2]  Judit Padisák,et al.  Disturbance and stress: different meanings in ecological dynamics? , 2013, Hydrobiologia.

[3]  F. Rimet,et al.  Biomonitoring river diatoms: Implications of taxonomic resolution , 2012 .

[4]  M. Honti,et al.  Phytoplankton growth in three rivers: The role of meroplankton and the benthic retention hypothesis , 2011 .

[5]  Pierluigi Viaroli,et al.  Physical factors and dissolved reactive silica affect phytoplankton community structure and dynamics in a lowland eutrophic river (Po river, Italy) , 2011, Hydrobiologia.

[6]  G. Friedrich,et al.  Long-term plankton studies at the lower Rhine/Germany , 2009 .

[7]  S. Hendricks,et al.  Benthic Algae Taxa (Exclusive of Diatoms) of the Little River Basin, Western Kentucky, 2000–2003 , 2007 .

[8]  D. Charles,et al.  Choice of substrate in algae-based water-quality assessment , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[9]  L. Ector,et al.  Benthic diatom flora in a small Hungarian tributary of River Danube (Rákos-stream) , 2004 .

[10]  M. A. Cobelas,et al.  An elementary, structural analysis of river phytoplankton , 1994, Hydrobiologia.

[11]  J. Garnier,et al.  Modelling phytoplankton development in whole drainage networks: the RIVERSTRAHLER Model applied to the Seine river system , 1994, Hydrobiologia.

[12]  J. Lund,et al.  The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimations by counting , 1958, Hydrobiologia.

[13]  M. Welker,et al.  Plankton dynamics in a river-lake system – on continuity and discontinuity , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[14]  K. T. Kiss,et al.  Benthic algal investigations in the Danube river and some of its main tributaries from Germany to Hungary , 2003 .

[15]  Leska S. Fore,et al.  Using diatoms to assess the biological condition of large rivers in Idaho (U.S.A.) , 2002 .

[16]  A. Schmidt,et al.  Changes of the Chlorophyta species in the phytoplankton of the Hungarian section of the Danube river during the last decades (1961-1997) , 1998 .

[17]  Jean-Pierre Descy,et al.  USE OF PHYTOPLANKTON IN LARGE RIVER MANAGEMENT , 1998 .

[18]  C. Reynolds,et al.  The production, biomass and structure of phytoplankton in large rivers , 1996 .

[19]  K. Kiss Trophic level and eutrophication of the River Danube in Hungary , 1994 .

[20]  J. Stanford,et al.  The serial discontinuity concept of lotic ecosystems , 1983 .

[21]  R. Bachmann,et al.  A Model of Algal Exports in Some Iowa Streams , 1976 .

[22]  Malcolm Parlett,et al.  The new evaluation. , 1974 .

[23]  M. Douglas Use of the Self , 1951 .