Form follows function: Interjections and onomatopoetica in comics

Abstract One of the specific features of language in comics is the relatively frequent occurrence of interjections, and onomatopoetica in general. Such words show remarkable variation in their written forms. In our study, we focus on these variations: We created a database of interjections′ spelling variants, based on six comics, and subsequently analysed them. First, we demonstrate that the variant spellings of interjections can be modelled within a formal theory of writing systems: Neef's Recoding Model of Graphematics, published in 2005, that distinguishes between orthography, i.e., the study of the spelling of words, and graphematics, i.e., the study of the relation between written forms and phonological representations. While theoretical models of writing systems often specifically exclude interjections from the scope of their theory, Neef's model includes them and furthermore predicts variation in their spellings. Second, we analyse which additional information can be transmitted through the choice of spelling variants, e.g., instead of , as well as by typographic means, i.e., variations in letter font, shape, size, colour, or orientation. We distinguish five possible functions which might be conveyed by the variant forms, including functions which go beyond the purpose of visualising audible phenomena (=phonetic function): alerting function, play function, relation function, and indexical function.

[1]  Michael Stubbs,et al.  Spelling and society: The culture and politics of orthography around the world , 2009 .

[2]  C. Habel,et al.  Language , 1931, NeuroImage.

[3]  Eirlys E. Davies,et al.  Eyeplay: On some uses of nonstandard spelling , 1987 .

[4]  Jannis Androutsopoulos Non‐standard spellings in media texts: The case of German fanzines , 2000 .

[5]  Suzanne Romaine,et al.  Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities , 1982 .

[6]  Mark Balhorn Paper Representations of the Non-Standard Voice. , 1998 .

[7]  Karl Bühler,et al.  Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language , 2011 .

[8]  Richard Sproat,et al.  Book Reviews: A Computational Theory of Writing Systems , 2006, CL.

[9]  M. Neef,et al.  Graphematics as part of a modular theory of phonographic writing systems , 2012 .

[10]  Martin Neef Die Graphematik des Deutschen , 2005 .

[11]  Jannis Androutsopoulos,et al.  Floating ideologies: Metamorphoses of graphic ,Germanness` , 2012 .

[12]  Alexandra Jaffe,et al.  Orthography as Social Action:Scripts, Spelling, Identity and Power , 2012 .

[13]  Jenny Cheshire,et al.  Linguistic Variation and Social Function , 1997 .

[14]  A. Nunn Dutch orthography : a systematic investigation of the spelling of Dutch words , 2006 .

[15]  W. Wundt Völkerpsychologie : eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte , 1909 .

[16]  Edward Carney,et al.  A Survey of English Spelling , 1993 .

[17]  Gisela Zifonun,et al.  Grammatik der deutschen Sprache , 1997 .

[18]  M. Saraceni The language of comics , 2003 .