Vermeers and Rembrandts in the Same Attic: Complementarity between Copyright and Trademark Leveraging Strategies in Software

We examine the interrelationships between firms' efforts to leverage different types of intellectual property (IP) rights. While prior research has tended to view different forms of intellectual property as substitutes, we argue that they can also be viewed as complements. We motivate this argument by shifting the unit of analysis away from the level of a single invention to the level of the technology, product or firm. Using unstructured interviews, we develop hypotheses about the causes of IP complementarity. Specifically, we hypothesize that complementarity may result from common inputs into the management of IP within the firm, such as managerial attention to IP issues and organizational resources deployed for IP management. Our hypotheses are tested in the PC software industry with a seemingly-unrelated-regression (SUR) model, which provides support for complementarity between copyrights and trademarks in software, and suggests that this complementarity stems at least in part from our hypothesized common inputs into IP management. Our work addresses both the relative neglect of non-patent intellectual property rights and the disproportionate reliance on the IP-as-substitutes view in prior research.

[1]  Stuart J. H. Graham,et al.  Submarines in software? continuations in US software patenting in the 1980s and 1990s , 2004 .

[2]  W. Dugger The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[3]  Margaret A. Peteraf The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[4]  A. Arundel The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation , 2001 .

[5]  George Strauss,et al.  Tracking the Giant Corporation@@@Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. , 1991 .

[6]  A. Pakes,et al.  Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look , 1984 .

[7]  R. Posner,et al.  Some Economics of Trade Secret Law , 1991 .

[8]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization , 1990 .

[9]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial R&D , 1988 .

[10]  Stephen A Merrill,et al.  Patents in the knowledge-based economy , 2003 .

[11]  W. Ocasio TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[12]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[13]  Arnold Plant The Economic Aspects of Copyright in Books , 1934 .

[14]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[15]  N. Harabi,et al.  Sources Of Technical Progress: Empirical Evidence From Swiss Industry , 1995 .

[16]  Deepak Somaya FIRM STRATEGIES AND TRENDS IN PATENT LITIGATION IN THE UNITED STATES , 2004 .

[17]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[18]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[19]  P Samuelson CONTU revisited: the case against copyright protection for computer programs in machine-readable form. , 1984, Duke law journal.

[20]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[21]  R. Rumelt How much does industry matter , 1991 .

[22]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first report , 1980 .

[23]  A. Arora Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights And The Market For Know-How , 1995 .

[24]  S. Athey,et al.  An Empirical Framework for Testing Theories About Complimentarity in Organizational Design , 1998 .

[25]  Deepak Somaya Strategic determinants of decisions not to settle patent litigation , 2003 .

[26]  Pamela Samuelson,et al.  Survey on the Look and Feel Lawsuits , 1990, Commun. ACM.

[27]  Arnold Plant,et al.  The Economic Theory Concerning Patents for Inventions , 1934 .

[28]  A. Arora Testing for complementarities in reduced-form regressions: A note , 1996 .

[29]  S. Lippman,et al.  A BARGAINING PERSPECTIVE ON RESOURCE ADVANTAGE , 2003 .

[30]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis Don't Fence Me in: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[32]  James G. March,et al.  How Decisions Happen in Organizations , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[33]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities, Momentum, and the Evolution of Modern Manufacturing , 1991 .

[34]  A. Arundel,et al.  What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms , 1998 .