Overfishing and the Common Fisheries Policy: (un)successful results from TAC regulation?

This paper combines official data from 1990–2007 for (i) the Total Allowable Catchs (TACs) recommended by International Council for the Exploration for the Sea (ICES) scientists and the proposed and approved TACs and (ii) biomass, recruitment, catches, fishing effort, and current exploitation rates for all marine populations subjected to TAC regulation. The differences between the fishing quotas and the scientific recommendations provided by the ICES were calculated to be 19% after the first CFP reform (1992–2001) and 21% after the second one (2002–2008). In some species, these differences showed a three-fold increase, in particular those currently considered to be beyond the biological safety limits. Regarding the most important index of abundance, the results also indicate a biomass and recruitment reduction of ∼75–85% of the stocks and 90% of catches, whereas the fishing mortality increased in 35% of stocks. In addition, of all populations analysed under TAC regulation, 20% presents an increase in the current exploitation rate, 17% did not show significant changes, and the remaining 63% presented a reduction between 1990 and 2007. These results could contribute to the recovery of stocks. However, following the methodology used by Worm et al. who reported that 6 out of the 10 (60%) marine ecosystems examined showed current exploitation rate values that were significantly higher than those that provide the maximum sustainable yield, this study demonstrates that 86% of the populations regulated by TACs present values higher than exploitation rates that give maximum sustainable yield, following an alarming pattern of exploitation.

[1]  Juan C. Surís-Regueiro,et al.  Effectiveness of the structural fisheries policy in the European Union , 2003 .

[2]  S. Villasante,et al.  Global assessment of the European Union fishing fleet: An update , 2010 .

[3]  D. Pauly,et al.  Growth and distribution of port-based global fishing effort within countries’ EEZs from 1970 to 1995 , 2007 .

[4]  D. Pauly,et al.  Ocean Sciences in Relation to Living Resources , 1982 .

[5]  G. Daily Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. , 1998 .

[6]  U. R. Sumaila,et al.  Estimating the effects of technological efficiency on the European fishing fleet , 2010 .

[7]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  Subsidies, buybacks, and sustainable fisheries , 2005 .

[8]  Arni Magnusson,et al.  State of the World’s Fisheries , 2003 .

[9]  A. Uriarte,et al.  The spawning environment of the Bay of Biscay anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus L.) , 1996 .

[10]  W. V. Densen,et al.  Policy and knowledge in fisheries management: a policy briefa , 2007 .

[11]  E. Barbier,et al.  Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services , 2006, Science.

[12]  J. Andersen,et al.  Economic gains of liberalising access to fishing quotas within the European Union , 2009 .

[13]  G. Piet,et al.  The necessity for response indicators in fisheries management , 2010 .

[14]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Rebuilding Global Fisheries , 2009, Science.

[15]  J. Sarmiento,et al.  Projecting global marine biodiversity impacts under climate change scenarios , 2009 .

[16]  S. Villasante Fisheries management of straddling fish stocks in the Patagonian Marine Ecosystem , 2009 .

[17]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Fisheries Impacts on North Atlantic Ecosystems : Evaluations and Policy Exploration , 2001 .

[18]  D. Pauly,et al.  In a Perfect Ocean: The State Of Fisheries And Ecosystems In The North Atlantic Ocean , 2003 .

[19]  C. Walters,et al.  Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: Choice, dynamics and uncertainty , 2004, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[20]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Estimating the Worldwide Extent of Illegal Fishing , 2009, PloS one.

[21]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Economics of Overexploitation Revisited , 2007, Science.

[22]  Knut H. Mikalsen,et al.  Leaning on user-groups: The role of civil society in fisheries governance , 2007 .

[23]  S. Gaines,et al.  Can Catch Shares Prevent Fisheries Collapse? , 2008, Science.

[24]  P. Pepin Fisheries Ecology and Management , 2005 .

[25]  C W Clark,et al.  Current Problems in the Management of Marine Fisheries , 2007, Science.

[26]  W. Adger,et al.  Vulnerability of national economies to the impacts of climate change on fisheries , 2009 .

[27]  Other Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2010 , 2010 .

[28]  C. Folke,et al.  The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions , 2007 .

[29]  Daniel Pauly,et al.  Re-estimation of small-scale fishery catches for U.S. flag-associated island areas in the western Pacific: the last 50 years , 2007 .

[30]  U. R. Sumaila,et al.  Simulation of ecological and economic impacts of distant water fleets on Namibian fisheries , 2000 .

[31]  Alexander Proelß,et al.  Rebuilding fish stocks no later than 2015: will Europe meet the deadline? , 2010 .

[32]  Ahmed Khan The nature and magnitude of global non-fuel fisheries subsidies , 2006 .

[33]  C. Chu Thirty years later: the global growth of ITQs and their influence on stock status in marine fisheries , 2009 .