An Electrophysiological Index of Perceptual Goodness

A traditional line of work starting with the Gestalt school has shown that patterns vary in strength and salience; a difference in “Perceptual goodness.” The Holographic weight of evidence model quantifies goodness of visual regularities. The key formula states that W = E/N, where E is number of holographic identities in a pattern and N is number of elements. We tested whether W predicts the amplitude of the neural response to regularity in an extrastriate symmetry-sensitive network. We recorded an Event Related Potential (ERP) generated by symmetry called the Sustained Posterior Negativity (SPN). First, we reanalyzed the published work and found that W explained most variance in SPN amplitude. Then in four new studies, we confirmed specific predictions of the holographic model regarding 1) the differential effects of numerosity on reflection and repetition, 2) the similarity between reflection and Glass patterns, 3) multiple symmetries, and 4) symmetry and anti-symmetry. In all cases, the holographic approach predicted SPN amplitude remarkably well; particularly in an early window around 300–400 ms post stimulus onset. Although the holographic model was not conceived as a model of neural processing, it captures many details of the brain response to symmetry.

[1]  Emanuel Leeuwenberg,et al.  Holographic goodness is not that bad: Reply to Olivers, Chater and Watson (2004) , 2004 .

[2]  W. R. Garner.  The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[3]  Rick Gurnsey,et al.  Detection of symmetry and anti-symmetry , 2005, Vision Research.

[4]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Higher-order structure in regularity detection , 1993, Vision Research.

[5]  Gert van der Vloed,et al.  Blobs strengthen repetition but weaken symmetry , 2003, Vision Research.

[6]  L. Glass.  Moiré Effect from Random Dots , 1969, Nature.

[7]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Predominantly extra-retinotopic cortical response to pattern symmetry , 2005, NeuroImage.

[8]  M. Wertheimer.  Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II , 1923 .

[9]  M. Bertamini,et al.  Conditions for view invariance in the neural response to visual symmetry. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[10]  H. Barlow,et al.  The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays , 1979, Vision Research.

[11]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Scaling of the extrastriate neural response to symmetry , 2015, Vision Research.

[12]  Thomas Jacobsen,et al.  Electrophysiological indices of processing aesthetics: Spontaneous or intentional processes? , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[13]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  The Causal Role of the Occipital Face Area (OFA) and Lateral Occipital (LO) Cortex in Symmetry Perception , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Brain Activity in Response to Visual Symmetry , 2014, Symmetry.

[15]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Symmetry perception and affective responses: A combined EEG/EMG study , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Mechanisms of perceptual learning for vernier acuity , 2002 .

[17]  M. Kubovy,et al.  Grouping by Proximity and Multistability in Dot Lattices: A Quantitative Gestalt Theory , 1995 .

[18]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Goodness of Regularity in Dot Patterns: Global Symmetry, Local Symmetry, and Their Interactions , 2007, Perception.

[19]  Masahiro Takei,et al.  Human resource development and visualization , 2009, J. Vis..

[20]  W. R. Garner.  Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts , 1975 .

[21]  F. Royer,et al.  Detection of symmetry. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Emanuel Leeuwenberg,et al.  A better approach to goodness: Reply to Wagemans (1999). , 1999 .

[23]  J. Hochberg,et al.  A quantitative approach to figural "goodness". , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  Marco Bertamini,et al.  Right-lateralized alpha desynchronization during regularity discrimination: Hemispheric specialization or directed spatial attention? , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[25]  T. Jacobsen,et al.  Descriptive and evaluative judgment processes: Behavioral and electrophysiological indices of processing symmetry and aesthetics , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[26]  Nick Chater,et al.  Holography does not account for goodness: a critique of van der Helm and Leeuwenberg (1996). , 2004, Psychological review.

[27]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[28]  R. Watt,et al.  Detection of bilateral symmetry using spatial filters. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[29]  C. Tyler.  Human Symmetry Perception and Its Computational Analysis , 2002 .

[30]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[31]  M Kubovy,et al.  Detection of symmetry and perceptual organization: the way a lock-and-key process works. , 1997, Acta psychologica.

[32]  Mark W Pettet,et al.  Temporal dynamics of the human response to symmetry. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[33]  Peter A. van der Helm,et al.  The Influence of Perception on the Distribution of Multiple Symmetries in Nature and Art , 2011, Symmetry.

[34]  A. Norcia,et al.  Representation of Maximally Regular Textures in Human Visual Cortex , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  F. Attneave.  Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[36]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Symmetry detection in typically and atypically speech lateralized individuals: A visual half-field study , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  D. Knill,et al.  The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[38]  Ernst Mach,et al.  The analysis of sensations and the relation of the physical to the psychical , 1914, The Mathematical Gazette.

[39]  Matthias S. Treder,et al.  Detection of (anti)symmetry and (anti)repetition: Perceptual mechanisms versus cognitive strategies , 2009, Vision Research.

[40]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Optimal integration of shading and binocular disparity for depth perception. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[41]  Christopher W Tyler,et al.  Face configuration processing in the human brain: the role of symmetry. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  Wim Vanduffel,et al.  Symmetry activates extrastriate visual cortex in human and nonhuman primates. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  J. Wagemans.  Toward a Better Approach to Goodness: Comments on Van der Helm and Leeuwenberg (1996) , 1999 .

[44]  K. Koffka.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[45]  Peter Wenderoth.  The Effects of the Contrast Polarity of Dot-Pair Partners on the Detection of Bilateral Symmetry , 1996, Perception.

[46]  E. Leeuwenberg,et al.  Goodness of visual regularities: a nontransformational approach. , 1996, Psychological review.

[47]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Bistable Gestalts reduce activity in the whole of V1, not just the retinotopically predicted parts. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[48]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  The causal role of the lateral occipital complex in visual mirror symmetry detection and grouping: An fMRI-guided TMS study , 2014, Cortex.

[49]  M. Bertamini,et al.  Electrophysiological responses to visuospatial regularity. , 2013, Psychophysiology.