A-Si:H/CsI(Tl) flat-panel versus computed radiography for chest imaging applications: image quality metrics measurement.

Amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) flat-panel (FP) imaging systems have recently become commercially available for both chest and mammographic imaging applications. It has been shown that this new detector technology offers better image quality and various operational advantages over the computed radiography (CR) which to date has been the most widely implemented and used digital radiography technique. However, most image quality measurements reported on flat-panel systems have been performed on prototype systems in laboratories while those for CR systems were typically independently performed and reported on in separate studies. To directly compare the two technologies, we have measured the image properties for a commercial amorphous silicon/cesium iodide [a-Si:H/CsI(Tl)] flat-panel based digital chest system and a commercial CR system under clinical imaging conditions. In this paper, measurements of image quality metrics, including the modulation transfer functions (MTFs), noise power spectra (NPSs), and detective quantum efficiencies (DQEs), for the FP and CR systems are presented and compared. Methods and issues related to these measurements are discussed. The results show that the flat-panel system has slightly lower MTF but significantly higher DQEs than the CR system. The DQEs of the flat-panel system were found to increase with the exposure while those of the CR system decrease slightly with the exposure.

[1]  Kunio Doi,et al.  A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[2]  G. Iinuma,et al.  Diagnosis of gastric cancers: comparison of conventional radiography and digital radiography with a 4 million-pixel charge-coupled device. , 2000, Radiology.

[3]  S Suryanarayanan,et al.  Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system. , 2000, Medical physics.

[4]  Brian G. Rodricks,et al.  Improved imaging performance of a 14"x17" direct radiography system using a Se/TFT detector , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[5]  Kouhei Suzuki,et al.  Development and evaluation of a large-area selenium-based flat-panel detector for real-time radiography and fluoroscopy , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[6]  J W Oestmann,et al.  Improved control of image optical density with low-dose digital and conventional radiography in bedside imaging. , 1989, Radiology.

[7]  S S Sagel,et al.  Digital mobile radiography. , 1990, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[8]  H. Blume,et al.  DQE(f) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices. , 1995, Medical physics.

[9]  William Des Jardin,et al.  Large-format high-performance CCD sensor for medical x-ray applications , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[10]  J T Dobbins,et al.  Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems. , 1995, Medical physics.

[11]  Brian G. Rodricks,et al.  Development of a novel high-resolution direct conversion x-ray detector , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[12]  D Gur,et al.  High-resolution digital imaging with storage phosphors. , 1990, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[13]  M Giger,et al.  Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique. , 1991, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[14]  A R Cowen,et al.  A clinical comparison between conventional and digital mammography utilizing computed radiography. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[15]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray imaging using amorphous selenium: feasibility of a flat panel self-scanned detector for digital radiology. , 1995, Medical physics.

[16]  Martin Choquette,et al.  Direct selenium x-ray detector for fluoroscopy, R&F, and radiography , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[17]  J T Dobbins,et al.  Performance characteristics of a Kodak computed radiography system. , 1999, Medical physics.

[18]  Mark A. Hartney,et al.  High-performance amorphous silicon image sensor for x-ray diagnostic medical imaging applications , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[19]  Hiroaki Yasuda,et al.  Improvement of image quality in CR mammography by detection of emissions from dual sides of an imaging plate , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[20]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. , 2003, Medical physics.

[21]  M. Sonoda,et al.  Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence. , 1983, Radiology.

[22]  Thierry Ducourant,et al.  New CsI/a-Si 17" x 17" x-ray flat-panel detector provides superior detectivity and immediate direct digital output for general radiography systems , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[23]  Srinivasan Vedantham,et al.  New design of a structured CsI(Tl) screen for digital mammography , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[24]  P. Granfors,et al.  Performance of a 41X41-cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications. , 2000, Medical physics.

[25]  Toshiaki Suzuki,et al.  Novel computed radiography system with improved image quality by detection of emissions from both sides of an imaging plate , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[26]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  DQE of direct and indirect digital radiography systems , 2001 .

[27]  W A Murphy,et al.  Photostimulable phosphor digital radiography of the extremities: diagnostic accuracy compared with conventional radiography. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  C E Ravin,et al.  Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[29]  X Liu,et al.  Regional improvement of signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios in dual-screen CR chest imaging--a phantom study. , 2001, Medical physics.

[30]  A R Cowen,et al.  A comparison of the physical imaging properties of Fuji ST-V, ST-VA, and ST-VN computed radiography image plates. , 1998, Medical physics.

[31]  E. Samei,et al.  Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2k and 4k storage phosphor radiography systems. , 1999, Medical physics.

[32]  C E Ravin,et al.  Technical evaluation of a digital chest radiography system that uses a selenium detector. , 1995, Radiology.

[33]  Thorsten Graeve,et al.  High-resolution CMOS imaging detector , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[34]  Daniel R. Bednarek,et al.  Evaluation of a CMOS image detector for low-cost and power medical x-ray imaging applications , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[35]  S Suryanarayanan,et al.  Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. , 2000, Medical physics.