Training domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) on a novel discrete trials odor-detection task

Abstract Dogs can be trained to reliably detect a wide variety of odors. Little scientific research, however, has been published on the rate at which dogs can learn to detect an odor, the variables influencing this rate, and how this rate may vary across dogs. In two experiments, we developed a procedure that allows the study of individual differences in the acquisition of an odor detection task in dogs. We demonstrate that differential reinforcement can be used to train a rooting response in a bin under the control of a novel odorant in discrete trials. In initial testing, we showed that as a group, twenty dogs performed significantly above chance within 24 trials, with two dogs meeting an individual criterion for above chance performance. In a follow-up experiment, we compared burying accessible food inside the target bin (with inaccessible food in the non-target bin) to the experimenter delivering food by hand following correct responses. We assessed the effect of this procedural variation on both an odor discrimination and a visual discrimination. Dogs learned faster on the odor task when the experimenter delivered food, compared to when food was placed directly in the bins. Performance on the visual task was lower than on the odor task and was unaffected by how food was delivered. Our discrete-trials procedure with experimenter-delivered food may be a useful method to study rapid acquisition of an odor-detection in dogs.

[1]  Burton Slotnick,et al.  Animal cognition and the rat olfactory system , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  S. Gosling,et al.  Personality and performance in military working dogs: Reliability and predictive validity of behavioral tests , 2010 .

[3]  Julie B. Schweitzer,et al.  Handler beliefs affect scent detection dog outcomes , 2011, Animal Cognition.

[4]  L. J. Myers,et al.  The scientific foundation and efficacy of the use of canines as chemical detectors for explosives. , 2001, Talanta.

[5]  John C. Sagebiel,et al.  Olfaction-based Detection Distance: A Quantitative Analysis of How Far Away Dogs Recognize Tortoise Odor and Follow It to Source , 2008, Sensors.

[6]  R. M. Tarpy,et al.  Reinforcement delay: A selective review of the last decade. , 1974 .

[7]  C. A. Kiddy,et al.  Estrus-related odors in milk detected by trained dogs. , 1984, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  C. Willis,et al.  Olfactory detection of human bladder cancer by dogs: proof of principle study , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  J. Langlois,et al.  An olfactory discrimination procedure for mice. , 2000, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  C. Wynne,et al.  Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human gestures but not nonhuman tokens to find hidden food. , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.

[11]  A. Weiss,et al.  Traits and genotypes may predict the successful training of drug detection dogs , 2007 .

[12]  James M. Johnston,et al.  Training and maintaining the performance of dogs (Canis familiaris) on an increasing number of odor discriminations in a controlled setting , 2002 .

[13]  Olivier Cussenot,et al.  Olfactory detection of prostate cancer by dogs sniffing urine: a step forward in early diagnosis. , 2011, European urology.

[14]  R. Gerlai,et al.  Can angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare) count? Discrimination between different shoal sizes follows Weber’s law , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[15]  Edward E Dean Training Dogs for Narcotic Detection , 1972 .

[16]  M. Libbey,et al.  Neonatal monoaminergic depletion in mice (Mus musculus) improves performance of a novel odor discrimination task. , 1998, Behavioral neuroscience.

[17]  J. Terkel,et al.  Olfaction and Explosives Detector Dogs , 2009 .

[18]  L. Paul Waggoner,et al.  Effects of extraneous odors on canine detection , 1998, Other Conferences.

[19]  Wolfgang Heuwieser,et al.  Training dogs on a scent platform for oestrus detection in cows , 2011 .