When is a stage not a stage? A critique of Piaget's theory of cognitive development and its application to science education

Summary Piaget's theory of cognitive development, in particular his ‘stage theory’, is having a significant influence on thinking about school science curricula. In the trend to more informal and child‐centred methods, his ideas have formed a base for many primary science programmes over the world.1 Until fairly recently, however, the impact of his thinking has not been felt in secondary science programmes. There are now signs that this is changing. The Piagetian model, particularly the stage theory, is being used in this country and elsewhere as both a scale on which to measure scientific development2 and an explanatory system to account for the difficulties secondary school pupils encounter in understanding scientific ideas.3, 4, 5 With this growing awareness of Piaget's work and its implications among secondary science teachers and curriculum developers perhaps it is timely to take a step back and review the status of the work critically. Since it is addressing itself to the relevance of Piagetian theo...

[1]  Robert H. Ennis.  Children’s Ability to Handle Piaget’s Propositional Logic: A Conceptual Critique , 1975 .

[2]  E. A. PEEL.  Generalizing and Abstracting , 1971, Nature.

[3]  The effects of training in the proportional reasoning associated with the concept of speed , 1976 .

[4]  John W. Renner,et al.  Relationships of science subject matter and developmental levels of learners , 1975 .

[5]  K. Lovell,et al.  A follow-up study of Inhelder and Piaget's The Growth of Logical Thinking. , 1961, British journal of psychology.

[6]  Michael Cole,et al.  Culture and thought; a psychological introduction , 1974 .

[7]  E. Lunzer,et al.  Problems of formal reasoning in test situations. , 1965, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[8]  Steve A. Sayre,et al.  Piagetian cognitive development and achievement in science , 1975 .

[9]  K. Lovell.  Intellectual Growth and Understanding Science , 1974 .

[10]  C. Desforges,et al.  Piagetian psychology and education: time for revision. , 1977, The British journal of educational psychology.

[11]  C. Brainerd.  The Development of the Proportionality Scheme in Children and Adolescents. , 1971 .

[12]  Alan E. Wheeler,et al.  Proportional Reasoning in Introductory High School Chemistry. , 1977 .

[13]  J. Flavell.  The Developmental psychology of Jean Piaget , 1963 .

[14]  P. Ashton.  Cross-cultural Piagetian research: An experimental perspective. , 1975 .

[15]  C. Parsons,et al.  Inhelder and Piaget's The Growth of Logical Thinking. II. A logician's viewpoint. , 1960, British journal of psychology.

[16]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Growth Of Logical Thinking From Childhood To Adolescence: An Essay On The Construction Of Formal Operational Structures , 1958 .

[17]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Psychology of Reasoning: Structure and Content , 1972 .

[18]  S JACKSON,et al.  THE GROWTH OF LOGICAL THINKING IN NORMAL AND SUBNORMAL CHILDREN. , 1965, The British journal of educational psychology.

[19]  M. Shayer.  How To Assess Science Courses. , 1970 .

[20]  J. Piaget.  Intellectual Evolution from Adolescence to Adulthood , 1972 .

[21]  M. Shayer,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF PIAGETIAN STAGES OF THINKING IN BRITISH MIDDLE AND SECONDARY SCHOOL CHILDREN , 1976 .

[22]  T. Bynum,et al.  Piaget's System of 16 Binary Operations: An Empirical Investigation , 1973 .