Interpersonal evidentiality: The Mandarin V-过 guo construction and other evidential systems beyond the ‘source of information’

This study aims at establishing a new evidential category of interpersonal evidentiality (IE). IE grounds the illocutionary force of a statement in intersubjective knowledge shared by the speaker and other assumed members of society, regardless of whatever the source of information is. Drawing on Nuyts’s (1992, 2001a,b) work on the evidential application of the notion of intersubjectivity (Traugott and Dasher, 2002; Traugott, 1999, 2003, 2010; Verhagen, 2005) this paper argues that the perfect V-过 guo evolved in Modern Mandarin into a new IE construction. I provided a qualitative survey on 862 occurrences from the LCMC (Lancaster Corpus of Mandarin Chinese) proving the specific interpersonal dimension of V-过 guo as an evidential marker. I demonstrate in this work that IE can be seen as a proper typological category characterized by specifically grammaticalized items in many languages of the world. The theoretical implications of the establishment of IE as a typologically attested domain must lead us to redefine the primary semantics of evidentiality. The secondary claim of this work is thus to reconsider evidentiality as a non-modal domain primarily marking different types of ‘acquired knowledge’ rather than a ‘particular source of information’. Evidential constructions encoding specific sources of evidence must then be considered as a sub-class of the broader semantic scope of ‘acquired knowledge’ (AK). In essence, AK is here regarded as the primary pragmatic and semantic connotation of any type of evidential construction or strategy.

[1]  Östen Dahl,et al.  Tense and aspect systems , 1985 .

[2]  G. Lazard Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other? , 1999 .

[3]  J. Nuyts Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective , 2001 .

[4]  G. Leech Principles of pragmatics , 1983 .

[5]  J. van der Auwera,et al.  Towards a typology of discontinuous past marking , 2006 .

[6]  Vladimir A. Plungian,et al.  The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space , 2001 .

[7]  Scott Delancey,et al.  Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information , 1997 .

[8]  M. Kim Evidentiality in achieving entitlement, objectivity, and detachment in Korean conversation , 2005 .

[9]  Elly Ifantidou,et al.  Evidentials and relevance , 2001 .

[10]  8. Evidentiality in the Balkans with special attention to Macedonian and Albanian , 2003 .

[11]  Johanna Nichols,et al.  Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology , 1986 .

[12]  Elizabeth Closs Traugott,et al.  Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Subjectification in grammaticalisation , 1995 .

[13]  M. Tomasello The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition , 2000 .

[14]  Kees Hengeveld,et al.  Illocution, Mood and Modality in a Functional Grammar of Spanish , 1988, J. Semant..

[15]  Anaïd Donabédian,et al.  Towards a semasiological account of evidentials : An enunciative approach of -er in Modern Western Armenian , 2001 .

[16]  Kathleen Carey Pragmatics, subjectivity and the grammaticalization of the English perfect , 1994 .

[17]  Scott DeLancey,et al.  The mirative and evidentiality , 2001 .

[18]  L. Johanson Evidentiality in Turkic , 2003 .

[19]  Jo-wang Lin,et al.  Predicate restriction, discontinuity property and the meaning of the perfective marker Guo in Mandarin Chinese , 2007 .

[20]  K. Carey Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Subjectification and the development of the English perfect , 1995 .

[21]  Ilana Mushin Evidentiality and epistemological stance in Macedonian, English and Japanese narrative , 1998 .

[22]  Martina Faller,et al.  The Deictic Core of 'Non‐Experienced Past' in Cuzco Quechua , 2004, J. Semant..

[23]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World , 1994 .

[24]  Dan I. Slobin,et al.  Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Use of the Turkish Evidential , 1982 .

[25]  Charles N. Li,et al.  Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar , 1989 .

[26]  Richard B. Dasher,et al.  Regularity in Semantic Change , 2002 .

[27]  A. Verhagen Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition , 2007 .

[28]  F. Palmer,et al.  Mood and modality , 1986 .

[29]  Hsiao-Ching Wu A Case Study on the Grammaticalization of GUO in Mandarin Chinese-Polysemy of the Motion Verb with Respect to Semantic Changes , 2003 .

[30]  Elizabeth Closs Traugott,et al.  Motives for Language Change: From subjectification to intersubjectification , 2003 .

[31]  Jiun-Shiung Wu,et al.  Terminability, wholeness and semantics of experiential guo , 2008 .

[32]  J. van der Auwera,et al.  Modality’s semantic map , 1998 .

[33]  Martina Faller Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua , 2002 .

[34]  Robert Iljic,et al.  The verbal suffix -guo in Mandarin Chinese and the notion of recurrence , 1990 .

[35]  Akio Kamio,et al.  Territory of information , 1997 .

[36]  Anthony McEnery,et al.  Aspect in Mandarin Chinese , 2004 .

[37]  J. Nuyts Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions , 2001 .

[38]  Key-Sun Choi,et al.  A computational model of Korean morphological analysis: A prediction-based approach , 1996 .

[39]  Jan Nuyts Subjective vs. objective modality: what is the difference? , 1992 .

[40]  William J. Pulte The Experienced and Nonexperienced Past in Cherokee , 1985, International Journal of American Linguistics.

[41]  H. Pan,et al.  The role of pragmatics in interpreting the chinese perfective markers -guo and -le , 2004 .

[42]  Jo-Wang Lin,et al.  Time in a Language Without Tense: The Case of Chinese , 2006, J. Semant..

[43]  Barbara A. Fox Evidentiality: Authority, Responsibility, and Entitlement in English Conversation , 2008 .

[44]  Carlota S. Smith,et al.  The Parameter of Aspect , 1991 .

[45]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction , 2008 .

[46]  M. Kim Negotiating epistemic rights to information in Korean conversation: An examination of the Korean evidential marker –tamye , 2011 .

[47]  O. Ducrot,et al.  Argumentativity and Informativity , 1989 .

[48]  Richard J. Watts An analysis of epistemic possibility and probability 1 , 1984 .

[49]  Bert Cornillie,et al.  Evidentiality and epistemic modality: On the close relationship between two different categories , 2009 .

[50]  S. Tatevosov From resultatives to evidentials : Multiple uses of the Perfect in Nakh-Daghestanian languages , 2001 .

[51]  Nobuko Trent Linguistic coding of evidentiality in Japanese spoken discourse and Japanese politeness , 1997 .

[52]  Ilana Mushin Evidentiality and epistemological stance , 2001 .

[53]  T. Givón Evidentiality and Epistemic Space , 1982 .

[54]  Carlota Smith,et al.  Modes of discourse , 2003 .

[55]  Rick Floyd,et al.  The Structure of Evidential Categories in Wanka Quechua , 1999 .

[56]  Östen Dahl Current relevance and event reference , 2000 .

[57]  Gilbert Lazard,et al.  On the grammaticalization of evidentiality , 2001 .

[58]  Joan L. Bybee Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form , 1985 .

[59]  Dan I. Slobin,et al.  A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish , 1986 .

[60]  Thomas L. Willett A Cross-Linguistic Survey of the Grammaticization of Evidentiality , 1988 .

[61]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  Concept, Image, and Symbol , 1990 .

[62]  E. Traugott On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change , 1989 .