Behavioral Turing test using two-axis actuators

The Turing test is an imitation game for determining the intelligence of an agent. In spite of its simplified setting, the use of natural language between two agents in the test is still too high a hurdle for achieving fruitful results in the field of artificial intelligence. In this paper, the authors propose a variation of the Turing test with a restricted communication method. This modified test uses behaviors generated by two-axis actuators for communication instead of the natural language dialogue used in the normal Turing test. This reduction of scope reveals what kinds of features are essential for an imitation game, and broaden the application brought by Turing test. When we learn what sorts of communication become possible with restricted actuation, we can apply this knowledge to any kind of robot or device in the real world. First, we tried to determine what elements are critical for communication between a user and a robot through a preliminary experiment involving human-human communication. A human manipulator received a video image as input and controlled a "robot box" with two actuators in a way that would lead a user to put other objects into the box. The results indicated what kinds of behavior are required to show the intention of the manipulator to the user. Second, we analyzed the result of the preliminary experiment, organized a behavioral model from the result, and programmed the robot box to run the model. The behavior of the robot was programmed according to the user's head and hand locations as identified by a motion captures system. The robot automatically interact with a human without human manipulation with this program. Third, we conducted a behavioral Turing test in a communication task whereby the human collected items according to the instructions of the robot box. In this test, two actuators on the box is controlled both by human manipulator and our program. The answers of users suggests that the users could not identify which is controlled by a human manipulator or the program. This result indicates that the Turing test succeed in a restricted behavioral level.

[1]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  Guest Editorial Active Learning and Intrinsically Motivated Exploration in Robots: Advances and Challenges , 2010, IEEE Trans. Auton. Ment. Dev..

[2]  Masahiro Fujita,et al.  On activating human communications with pet-type robot AIBO , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  Kazuo Tanie,et al.  Tabulation and analysis of questionnaire results of subjective evaluation of seal robot in UK , 2002, IEEE 2002 28th Annual Conference of the Industrial Electronics Society. IECON 02.

[4]  Active Learning and Intrinsically Motivated Exploration in Robots : Advances and Challenges , 2010 .

[5]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[6]  Brett Browning,et al.  A survey of robot learning from demonstration , 2009, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[7]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[8]  Kenneth M. Ford,et al.  Turing Test Considered Harmful , 1995, IJCAI.

[9]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[10]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Other bodies, other minds: A machine incarnation of an old philosophical problem , 1991, Minds and Machines.

[11]  Jun Nakanishi,et al.  Control, Planning, Learning, and Imitation with Dynamic Movement Primitives , 2003 .

[12]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Semi-Autonomous Robot Avatar as a Medium for Family Communication and Education , 2009, Adv. Robotics.

[13]  Tetsuo Ono,et al.  Android as a telecommunication medium with a human-like presence , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[14]  Hideki Kozima,et al.  Can a robot empathize with people? , 2004, Artificial Life and Robotics.

[15]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Subjective Evaluation of Seal Robot: Paro -Tabulation and Analysis of Questionnaire Results , 2002, J. Robotics Mechatronics.

[16]  Paul R. Cohen,et al.  If Not Turing's Test, Then What? , 2005, AI Mag..

[17]  Michio Okada,et al.  Minimal design strategy for embodied communication agents , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[18]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Simultaneous teleoperation of multiple social robots , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[19]  Magy Seif El-Nasr,et al.  Gestural Turing Test. A Motion-Capture Experiment for Exploring Believability In Artificial Nonverbal Communication. , 2010 .