Characterization and Control of Nanoparticle Emission during 3D Printing.

This study aimed to evaluate particle emission characteristics and to evaluate several control methods used to reduce particle emissions during three-dimensional (3D) printing. Experiments for particle characterization were conducted to measure particle number concentrations, emission rates, morphology, and chemical compositions under manufacturer-recommended and consistent-temperature conditions with seven different thermoplastic materials in an exposure chamber. Eight different combinations of the different control methods were tested, including an enclosure, an extruder suction fan, an enclosure ventilation fan, and several types of filter media. We classified the thermoplastic materials as high emitter (>1011 #/min), medium emitters (109 #/min -1011 #/min), and low emitters (<109 #/min) based on nanoparticle emissions. The nanoparticle emission rate was at least 1 order of magnitude higher for all seven filaments at the higher consistent extruder temperature than at the lower manufacturer-recommended temperature. Among the eight control methods tested, the enclosure with a high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter had the highest removal effectiveness (99.95%) of nanoparticles. Our recommendations for reducing particle emissions include applying a low temperature, using low-emitting materials, and instituting control measures like using an enclosure around the printer in conjunction with an appropriate filter (e.g., HEPA filter) during 3D printing.

[1]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Pulmonary effects of inhaled ultrafine particles , 2000, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[2]  David M. Brown,et al.  Size-dependent proinflammatory effects of ultrafine polystyrene particles: a role for surface area and oxidative stress in the enhanced activity of ultrafines. , 2001, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[3]  Amanda Hayes,et al.  Toxicological Considerations, Toxicity Assessment, and Risk Management of Inhaled Nanoparticles , 2016, International journal of molecular sciences.

[4]  Yu Zhou,et al.  Investigation of Ultrafine Particle Emissions of Desktop 3D Printers in the Clean Room , 2015 .

[5]  Stephen Mann,et al.  Nanoparticles can cause DNA damage across a cellular barrier. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[6]  L. Stabile,et al.  Airborne particle emission of a commercial 3D printer: the effect of filament material and printing temperature , 2017, Indoor air.

[7]  D. Warheit,et al.  Health effects related to nanoparticle exposures: environmental, health and safety considerations for assessing hazards and risks. , 2008, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[8]  Kaufui Wong,et al.  A Review of Additive Manufacturing , 2012 .

[9]  Chungsik Yoon,et al.  Emissions of Nanoparticles and Gaseous Material from 3D Printer Operation. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  W W Nazaroff,et al.  Effectiveness of in-room air filtration and dilution ventilation for tuberculosis infection control. , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[11]  P. Azimi,et al.  Ultrafine particle emissions from desktop 3D printers , 2013 .

[12]  H. Izumi,et al.  Significance of Persistent Inflammation in Respiratory Disorders Induced by Nanoparticles , 2014, Journal of immunology research.

[13]  Jeffrey A. Siegel,et al.  Primary and secondary consequences of indoor air cleaners. , 2016, Indoor air.

[14]  Bjarke Mølgaard,et al.  Characterization of Emissions from a Desktop 3D Printer , 2017 .

[15]  Robert B Lawrence,et al.  Characterization of chemical contaminants generated by a desktop fused deposition modeling 3-dimensional Printer , 2017, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[16]  Yelin Deng,et al.  The impact of manufacturing parameters on submicron particle emissions from a desktop 3D printer in the perspective of emission reduction , 2016 .

[17]  Evan L Floyd,et al.  Fume emissions from a low-cost 3-D printer with various filaments , 2017, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[18]  G. Adami,et al.  Nanoparticles skin absorption: New aspects for a safety profile evaluation. , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[19]  S. L. Sing,et al.  Introduction to Additive Manufacturing for Orthopaedic Implants , 2018, Springer Theses.

[20]  P. Azimi,et al.  Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Ryan F. LeBouf,et al.  Emission of particulate matter from a desktop three-dimensional (3D) printer , 2016, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[22]  Abdul Mutalib Leman,et al.  Progresses of filtration for removing particles and gases pollutants of indoor; limitations and future direction; review article , 2015 .

[23]  Patrick Steinle,et al.  Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer and indoor air measurements in office settings , 2016, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[24]  Yong Huang,et al.  Characterization of particulate matters and total VOC emissions from a binder jetting 3D printer , 2015 .