An Empirical Study of the Effect of Knowledge Management Processes at Individual, Group, and Organizational Levels

To enhance our understanding of knowledge management, this paper focuses on a specific question: How do knowledge management processes influence perceived knowledge management effectiveness? Prior literature is used to develop the research model, including hypotheses about the effects of four knowledge management processes (internalization, externalization, socialization, and combination) on perceived individual-level, group-level, and organizational-level knowledge management effectiveness. The study was conducted at the John F. Kennedy Space Center of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration using a survey of 159 individuals and two rounds of personal interviews. Structural equation modeling was performed to test measurement and structural models using the survey data. The emergent model suggests that internalization and externalization impact perceived effectiveness of individual-level knowledge management. Socialization and combination influence perceived effectiveness of knowledge management at group and organizational levels, respectively. The results also support the expected upward impact in perceived effectiveness of knowledge management, from individual to group level, as well as from group level to organizational level. The study's limitations and implications for practice and future research are described.

[1]  K. R. Conner.  A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? , 1991 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[3]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[4]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[5]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[6]  K. Weick.  The Nontraditional Quality of Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[7]  G. Hult,et al.  Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[8]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[9]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[10]  Barry J. Babin,et al.  Employee Behavior in a Service Environment: A Model and Test of Potential Differences between Men and Women: , 1998 .

[11]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[12]  Larry C. Giunipero,et al.  Organizational Learning in Global Purchasing: A Model and Test of Internal Users and Corporate Buyers , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[13]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[14]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  Social Context of Performance Evaluation Decisions , 1993 .

[15]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Competing Values in Organizations: Contextual Influences and Structural Consequences , 1996 .

[16]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Lotus Notes and Collaboration: Plus ça change , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Dan Holtshouse.  Knowledge Research Issues , 1998 .

[18]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[19]  R. Heck,et al.  Organizational Culture and Performance: Proposing and Testing a Model , 1993 .

[20]  James C. Anderson,et al.  An approach for confirmatory measurement and structural equation modeling of organizational properties , 1987 .

[21]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[22]  G. Susman,et al.  Advanced Manufacturing Technology and Organization Structure: Empowerment or Subordination? , 1992 .

[23]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[24]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[25]  John C. Narver,et al.  Market Orientation and the Learning Organization , 1995 .

[26]  J. Mentzer,et al.  Logistics Service Quality as a Segment-Customized Process , 2001 .

[27]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[28]  Gregory A. Rich.  The sales manager as a Role model: Effects on trust, job satisfaction, and performance of salespeople , 1997 .

[29]  K. Jöreskog.  Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices , 1978 .

[30]  R. Hurley.  Group culture and its effect on innovative productivity , 1995 .

[31]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[32]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Research Report - The Importance of Specification in Causal Modeling: The Case of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  G. Krogh,et al.  A perspective on knowledge, competence and strategy , 1995 .

[34]  Joseph A. Raelin,et al.  A Model of Work-Based Learning , 1997 .

[35]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Executives’ Perceptual Filters: What They Notice and How They Make Sense , 1988 .

[36]  G. Tomas M. Hult,et al.  Managing the International Strategic Sourcing Process as a Market‐Driven Organizational Learning System* , 1998 .

[37]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Monte Carlo Evaluations of Goodness of Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[38]  J. Walsh.  Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane , 1995 .

[39]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[40]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[41]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  A Review of Current Practices for Evaluating Causal Models in Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Management Research , 1994 .

[42]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[43]  Larry J. Williams,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods. , 1986 .

[44]  R. Liden,et al.  Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. , 1995 .

[45]  C. Argyris.  Organizational learning and management information systems , 1982, DATB.

[46]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  An Empirical Taxonomy of Implementation Processes Based on Sequences of Events in Information System Development , 1993 .

[47]  G. Farris,et al.  Knowledge Management in Research and Development , 2001 .

[48]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[49]  Glenn B. Voss,et al.  The Influence of Multiple Store Environment Cues on Perceived Merchandise Value and Patronage Intentions , 2002 .

[50]  H. Simon.  Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[51]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Challenger: Fine-Tuning the Odds Until Something Breaks , 1988 .

[52]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  A Multidimensional Model of Venture Growth , 2001 .

[53]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[54]  Rodrigo Magalhaes.  Organizational Knowledge and Learning , 1998 .

[55]  C. Fiol.  Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations. , 1994 .

[56]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .

[57]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Social construction of communication technology , 1993 .

[58]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[59]  Daniel J. McAllister.  Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .