Literacy Demands and Information to Cancer Patients

This study examines language complexity of written health information materials for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Written and printed patient information from 28 Swedish clinics are automatically analyzed by means of language technology. The analysis reveals different problematic issues that might have impact on readability. The study is a first step, and part of a larger project about patients’ health information seeking behavior in relation to written information material. Our study aims to provide support for producing more individualized, person centered information materials according to preferences for complex and detailed or legible texts and thus enhance a movement from receiving information and instructions to participating in knowing. In the near future the study will continue by integrating focus groups with patients that may provide valuable feedback and enhance our knowledge about patients’ use and preferences of different information material.

[1]  C. Shieh,et al.  Printed Health Information Materials: Evaluation of Readability and Suitability , 2008, Journal of community health nursing.

[2]  Gondy Leroy,et al.  Dynamic generation of a Health Topics Overview from consumer health information documents , 2008 .

[3]  L. Degner,et al.  The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review , 2005, Psycho-oncology.

[4]  L. G. Doak,et al.  Teaching Patients With Low Literacy Skills , 1985 .

[5]  Guda van Noort,et al.  Tailored information for cancer patients on the Internet: effects of visual cues and language complexity on information recall and satisfaction. , 2011, Patient education and counseling.

[6]  D. Helitzer,et al.  Health literacy demands of written health information materials: an assessment of cervical cancer prevention materials. , 2009, Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center.

[7]  Bonnie Darrell.  Community health nurses. , 2005, MCN. The American journal of maternal child nursing.

[8]  Véronique Hoste,et al.  Towards an Improved Methodology for Automated Readability Prediction , 2010, LREC.

[9]  Wei Zheng,et al.  Evaluating Online Health Information: Beyond Readability Formulas , 2008, AMIA.

[10]  Juliann Cortese,et al.  Computer-tailored health interventions delivered over the Web: review and analysis of key components. , 2009, Patient education and counseling.

[11]  Mirella Lapata,et al.  Modeling Local Coherence: An Entity-Based Approach , 2005, ACL.

[12]  Sofie Johansson Kokkinakis,et al.  A Cascaded Finite-State Parser for Syntactic Analysis of Swedish , 1999, EACL.

[13]  Patricia Liehr,et al.  Middle range theory for nursing , 2003 .

[14]  Maxine Eskénazi,et al.  Combining Lexical and Grammatical Features to Improve Readability Measures for First and Second Language Texts , 2007, NAACL.

[15]  Gondy Leroy,et al.  Health Information Text Characteristics , 2006, AMIA.

[16]  P. Nation,et al.  Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production , 1995 .

[17]  M. Litwin,et al.  Suitability of prostate cancer education materials: applying a standardized assessment tool to currently available materials. , 2004, Patient education and counseling.