Ode to an invisible woman: The story of qualified adults and partners in Ireland

Ireland used the Great Recession as an opportunity to pursue controversial reforms to lone parent social security payments while ignoring a significantly larger group of Irish women, qualified adults, the partners of coupled social welfare claimants. A review of the international literature about partners and recent policy trends is used to contextualise previously unpublished qualitative data capturing the practical experience of Irish partners and recent policy trends in relation to Irish partners. Despite the significant crisis-related rise in numbers of working aged qualified adults in Ireland, we see strong policy inertia in relation to this largely invisible group. The barriers to and lack of urgency for reform can be explained by several factors including fear of political backlash, ambiguous cultural norms about women’s roles, and practical capacity or lack of resources. The present policy architecture offers clear patriarchical dividends for male partners, employers and the policy elite, all of whom benefit from and remain attached to the concept of and the practice of a modified form of wifely labour. Policy avoidance cannot continue indefinitely, as reform of family-based welfare payments is central to resolving key policy problems including high participation rates and addressing child poverty. Options are briefly explored.

[1]  J. Warren Families and poverty: everyday life on a low income , 2016 .

[2]  Karen Jaehrling,et al.  A Paradox of Activation Strategies: Why Increasing Labour Market Participation among Single Mothers Failed to Bring Down Poverty Rates , 2015 .

[3]  M. Jepsen,et al.  Is the Economic Crisis Challenging the Prevailing Gender Regime?: A Comparison of Denmark, Germany, Slovakia, and the United Kingdom , 2014 .

[4]  Torsten Lietzmann After Recent Policy Reforms in Germany: Probability and Determinants of Labour Market Integration of Lone Mothers and Mothers with a Partner who Receive Welfare Benefits , 2014 .

[5]  T. Callan,et al.  Welfare Targeting and Work Incentives , 2014 .

[6]  Cordula Zabel,et al.  Active labour market programmes for women with a partner: challenge or replication of traditional gender roles , 2014 .

[7]  M. Murphy Ireland’s lone parents, social welfare and recession , 2014 .

[8]  Wolfgang Keck,et al.  The Impact of Different Social-Policy Frameworks on Social Inequalities among Women in the European Union: The Labour-Market Participation of Mothers , 2013 .

[9]  Jo Ingold,et al.  Work, welfare and gender inequalities: an analysis of activation strategies for partnered women in the UK, Australia and Denmark , 2013 .

[10]  W. Korpi,et al.  Women's Opportunities under Different Family Policy Constellations: Gender, Class, and Inequality Tradeoffs in Western Countries Re-examined , 2013 .

[11]  T. Callan,et al.  Work Incentives: New Evidence for Ireland , 2012 .

[12]  Pia S. Schober,et al.  Maternal employment and gender role attitudes: dissonance among British men and women in the transition to parenthood , 2012 .

[13]  M. Murphy Careless to Careful Activation : making activation work for women , 2012 .

[14]  M. Daly What Adult Worker Model?: A Critical Look at Recent Social Policy Reform in Europe from a Gender and Family Perspective , 2011, Social politics.

[15]  Jo Ingold Policy responses to partnered women outside the labour market : what can Britain learn from Australia and Denmark? , 2010 .

[16]  M. Murphy Reframing the Irish activation debate; Accommodating care and safeguarding social rights and choices , 2008 .

[17]  J. MacLeavy Engendering New Labour's Workfarist Regime: Exploring the intersection of welfare state restructuring and labour market policies in the UK , 2007 .

[18]  Amber Gazso Balancing Expectations for Employability and Family Responsibilities While on Social Assistance: Low‐Income Mothers’ Experiences in Three Canadian Provinces* , 2007 .

[19]  J. Aston Pakistani and Bangladeshi women's attitudes to work and family : a report of research carried out by the Institute for Employment Studies on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions , 2007 .

[20]  Henrike Rau,et al.  Towards a better future: research on labour market needs and social exclusion of one parent families in Galway city and county , 2007 .

[21]  Maryann Gialanella Valiulis,et al.  Literature review of issues related to work-life balance, workplace culture and maternity / childcare issues / Jennifer Redmond, Maryann Valiulis, Eileen Drew , 2006 .

[22]  Ute Gerhard,et al.  Working Mothers in Europe: A Comparison of Policies And Practices , 2005 .

[23]  F. Bennett Gender implications of current social security reforms , 2005 .

[24]  H. Bewley,et al.  Joint claims for JSA evaluation: synthesis of findings , 2005 .

[25]  S. Irwin,et al.  The Social Patterning of Values and Rationalities: Mothers' Choices in Combining Caring and Employment , 2004, Social Policy and Society.

[26]  Jane Millar Squaring the circle? Means Testing and Individualisation in the UK and Australia , 2004, Social Policy and Society.

[27]  S. Mcrae Constraints and choices in mothers' employment careers: a consideration of Hakim's Preference Theory. , 2003, The British journal of sociology.

[28]  M. Murphy A Woman’s Model For Social Welfare Reform , 2003 .

[29]  P. O'Connell,et al.  Getting Out of the House: Women Returning to Employment, Education and Training , 2002 .

[30]  Christopher V. Carlile,et al.  Welfare Reform Pilots: Characteristics and Participation Patterns of Three Disadvantaged Groups , 2002 .

[31]  R. Dorsett,et al.  New deal for partners: characteristics and labour market transitions of eligible couples , 2002 .

[32]  D. Sainsbury Gender and welfare state regimes , 1999 .

[33]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  The Recognition of Wifely Labour by Welfare States , 1995 .

[34]  M. Chamón,et al.  Coping with a crisis. , 2009, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[35]  Why do the wives of unemployed men have such low employment rates? , 2022 .