The diverse domains of quantified selves: self-tracking modes and dataveillance

Abstract The concept of self-tracking has recently begun to emerge in discussions of ways in which people can record specific features of their lives, often using digital technologies, to monitor, evaluate and optimize themselves. There is evidence that the personal data that are generated by the digital surveillance of individuals (dataveillance) are now used by a range of actors and agencies in diverse contexts. This paper examines the ‘function creep’ of self-tracking by outlining five modes that have emerged: private, communal, pushed, imposed and exploited. The analysis draws upon theoretical perspectives on concepts of selfhood, citizenship, dataveillance and the global digital data economy in discussing the wider socio-cultural implications of the emergence and development of these modes of self-tracking.

[1]  M. Foucault,et al.  Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault , 1988 .

[2]  N. Rose.  Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self , 1991 .

[3]  M. Strathern.  Introduction: new accountabilities : Anthropological studies in audit, ethics and the academy , 2003 .

[4]  Max E. Valentinuzzi,et al.  Understanding the human machine , 2004 .

[5]  S. Lash.  Power after Hegemony , 2007 .

[6]  Nikolas Rose,et al.  Molecular Biopolitics, Somatic Ethics and the Spirit of Biocapital , 2007 .

[7]  Joseph Pugliese,et al.  Biometrics: Bodies, Technologies, Biopolitics , 2010 .

[8]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Fit4life: the design of a persuasive technology promoting healthy behavior and ideal weight , 2011, CHI.

[9]  Alice E. Marwick.  The Public Domain: Social Surveillance In Everyday Life DRAFT VERSION , 2011 .

[10]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[11]  John Cheney-Lippold,et al.  A New Algorithmic Identity , 2011 .

[12]  Ian Richardson,et al.  Smart meter data: Balancing consumer privacy concerns with legitimate applications , 2012 .

[13]  Alice E. Marwick.  The Public Domain: Surveillance in Everyday Life , 2012 .

[14]  L. Floridi.  Technologies of the Self , 2012, Philosophy & Technology.

[15]  D. Lupton.  M-health and health promotion: The digital cyborg and surveillance society , 2012, Social Theory & Health.

[16]  Kaushik Sunder Rajan.  Introduction: The Capitalization of Life and the Liveliness of Capital , 2012 .

[17]  Deborah Lupton,et al.  Understanding the Human Machine [Commentary] , 2013, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[18]  Steve Mann,et al.  New Media and the power politics of sousveillance in a surveillance-dominated world. , 2013 .

[19]  D. Lupton.  Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies , 2013 .

[20]  Jennifer R. Whitson.  Gaming the Quantified Self , 2013 .

[21]  Dataveillance and Countervailance , 2013 .

[22]  K. Crawford,et al.  Big Data and Due Process: Toward a Framework to Redress Predictive Privacy Harms , 2013 .

[23]  Rita Raley,et al.  Dataveillance and Countervailance , 2013 .

[24]  Nicholas A. John.  Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword , 2013, New Media Soc..

[25]  Mark Andrejevic,et al.  Infoglut: How Too Much Information Is Changing the Way We Think and Know , 2013 .

[26]  D. Lupton.  The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era , 2013 .

[27]  Katina Michael,et al.  IEEE ISTAS13: Smart World- The Social Implications of Wearable Computers and Augmediated Reality in Everyday Life , 2013 .

[28]  Tom Rodden,et al.  At home with agents: exploring attitudes towards future smart energy infrastructures , 2013, IJCAI.

[29]  Celia Lury,et al.  Number ecologies: numbers and numbering practices , 2014 .

[30]  Dawn Nafus,et al.  This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice , 2014 .

[31]  Data & Civil Rights: Health Primer , 2014 .

[32]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Personal tracking as lived informatics , 2014, CHI.

[33]  J. Dijck.  Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology , 2014 .

[34]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  Towards Critical Data Studies: Charting and Unpacking Data Assemblages and Their Work , 2014 .

[35]  Jennifer Gabrys.  Programming Environments: Environmentality and Citizen Sensing in the Smart City , 2014 .

[36]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  The data revolution : big data, open data, data infrastructures & their consequences , 2014 .

[37]  Mark Andrejevic,et al.  The big data divide , 2014 .

[38]  Maged N. Kamel Boulos,et al.  On the Internet of Things, smart cities and the WHO Healthy Cities , 2014, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[39]  Martijn de Groot.  Quantified Self, Quantified Us, Quantified Other , 2014 .

[40]  Deborah Lupton,et al.  Critical perspectives on digital health technologies , 2014 .

[41]  D. Lupton,et al.  The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. , 2014, Sociology of health & illness.

[42]  Josip Car,et al.  Unaddressed privacy risks in accredited health and wellness apps: a cross-sectional systematic assessment , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[43]  Louise Amoore,et al.  Life beyond big data: governing with little analytics , 2015 .

[44]  Deborah Lupton.  Personal Data Practices in the Age of Lively Data , 2015 .

[45]  Bongshin Lee,et al.  Characterizing Visualization Insights from Quantified Selfers' Personal Data Presentations , 2015, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[46]  Ben Williamson.  Governing software: networks, databases and algorithmic power in the digital governance of public education , 2015 .

[47]  Ben Williamson.  Algorithmic skin: health-tracking technologies, personal analytics and the biopedagogies of digitized health and physical education , 2015 .

[48]  David Stuart,et al.  The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences , 2015, Online Inf. Rev..

[49]  Deborah Lupton,et al.  Data assemblages, sentient schools and digitised health and physical education (response to Gard) , 2015 .

[50]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  A lived informatics model of personal informatics , 2015, UbiComp.

[51]  Jingquan Li.  A Privacy Preservation Model for Health-Related Social Networking Sites , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[52]  Bongshin Lee,et al.  Revealing Visualization Insights from Quantified-Selfers' Personal Data Presentations. , 2015, IEEE computer graphics and applications.

[53]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Data entry: towards the critical study of digital data and education , 2015 .

[54]  E. Chiauzzi,et al.  ‘Trust but verify’ – five approaches to ensure safe medical apps , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[55]  Marlia E. Banning.  Shared entanglements – Web 2.0, info-liberalism & digital sharing , 2016 .

[56]  Andrew Robinson,et al.  The quantified self: What counts in the neoliberal workplace , 2016, New Media Soc..

[57]  Itzhak Benenson,et al.  The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and their Consequences. By Rob Kitchin, London: Sage, 2014. , 2016 .

[58]  Deborah Lupton,et al.  Toward a manifesto for the ‘public understanding of big data’ , 2016, Public understanding of science.

[59]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  Beyond the Quantified Self: Thematic exploration of a dataistic paradigm , 2017, New Media Soc..