Similarities in form symbolism among various languages and geographical regions

Similarities of language-independent form symbolism were tested across different geographical regions. In Experiment 1, word-form matching between 10 abstract words and 16 computer-generated nonsense forms was performed by between 61 and 107 undergraduate or volunteer participants in nine geographic regions of the world. Participants were native speakers of one of eight different languages: Japanese, Chinese, Korean, English, Italian, German, Serbian and Slovakian. The results demonstrated similar trends across languages and geographic regions. The small but significant differences between Eastern and Western groups found in Experiment 1 could be attributed to differences between them in the affective meanings of words rather than forms, as suggested by the results of Experiment 2. Experiment 2 involved participants (49 to 116 undergraduates from Japan, Taiwan, the US and Serbia) performing the 11-scale Semantic Differential technique on 10 words and eight of the 16 forms used in Experiment 1. It was concluded that the cross-regional similarity of form symbolism is based on the similarity of affective meanings of forms across different regions and languages.

[1]  C. Osgood.  Studies on the generality of affective meaning systems. , 1962 .

[2]  Charles E. Osgood,et al.  The cross-cultural generality of visual-verbal synesthetic tendencies. , 2007 .

[3]  박자은,et al.  A Study on the Therapeutic Color Design Methodin Residential Space , 2005 .

[4]  Geoffrey L. Collier,et al.  Affective synesthesia: Extracting emotion space from simple perceptual stimuli , 1996 .

[5]  Bernd H. Schmitt,et al.  Building Strong Brands in Asia: Selecting the Visual Components of Image to Maximize Brand Strength , 2003 .

[6]  Yasumasa Tanaka,et al.  COLOR-AFFECTION AND COLOR-SYMBOLISM IS JAPANESE AND AMERICAN STUDENTS , 1963 .

[7]  J. H. Ward.  Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[8]  D. E. Berlyne,et al.  Similarity and Preference Judgments of Indian and Canadian Subjects Exposed to Western Paintings , 1976 .

[9]  Shinobu Kitayama,et al.  Cultural constructions of happiness: theory and emprical evidence , 2004 .

[10]  M. Scheerer,et al.  Line Drawings and Matching Responses to Words1 , 1957 .

[11]  K. H. Ruddock,et al.  Visual form perception , 1975 .

[12]  Heinz Werner,et al.  Symbol formation : an organismic-developmental approach to language and the expression of thought , 1964 .

[13]  T. Oyama.  Synesthetic tendencies as the basis of sensory symbolism : A review of a series of experiments by means of semantic differential , 1998 .

[14]  Tadasu Oyama,et al.  Affective and Symbolic Meanings of Color and Form: Experimental Psychological Approaches , 2003 .

[15]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Form symbolism, analogy, and metaphor , 1997 .

[16]  K. Warner Schaie,et al.  Scaling the Association between Colors and Mood-Tones , 1961 .

[17]  M. Lindauer.  The effects of the physiognomic stimuli taketa and maluma on the meanings of neutral stimuli , 1990 .

[18]  Jay Seitz,et al.  NONVERBAL METAPHOR : A REVIEW OF THEORIES AND EVIDENCE , 1998 .

[19]  M SCHEERER,et al.  Line drawings and matching responses to words. , 1957, Journal of personality.

[20]  Tadasu Oyama,et al.  A cross-culture and cross-concept study of the generality of semantic spaces , 1963 .

[21]  An experimental study of naming , 1935 .

[22]  T. Oyama,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling of Computer-generated Abstract Forms , 2003 .

[23]  R. Arnheim.  Art and Visual Perception, a Psychology of the Creative Eye , 1967 .

[24]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  On Perceptual Metaphors , 1996 .

[25]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .